type (n) at that prompt.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Bob Middaugh wrote:
Hi,
I'm installing Sarge, installation completes, reboot, set timezone, root pwd,
Apt config pick http and debian.lcs.mit.edu.
After that, I get the ominious message about overwriting the kernel I'm
currently running and how
Sending message back to list:
On Monday 13 August 2007 16:23:55 you wrote:
> -- Original message --
> From: Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Monday 13 August 2007 13:44:52 Bob Middaugh wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm installing Sarge, installation completes, reboot
On Monday 13 August 2007 13:44:52 Bob Middaugh wrote:
I'm installing Sarge, installation completes, reboot, set timezone, root
pwd, Apt config pick http and debian.lcs.mit.edu.
After that, I get the ominious message about overwriting the kernel I'm
currently running and how this can be potentiall
On Monday 13 August 2007 13:44:52 Bob Middaugh wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm installing Sarge, installation completes, reboot, set timezone, root
> pwd, Apt config pick http and debian.lcs.mit.edu.
>
> After that, I get the ominious message about overwriting the kernel I'm
> currently running and how this can
On Friday 18 August 2006 14:34, Shadow wrote:
> Hi, All.
>
> A crazy idea came to me to install Debian Sarge 3.1r2 from source.
> I bought that 3DVD set, but found that there is no installer on
> those disks...
>
> Q1: in general, what is the process of installing debian from source?
You can't. T
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:35:00PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:04:23PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > >
> >
> > sometime in the far distant future, paleontologists will be debating
> > the classic questions like: Which came first? The compiler or the OS?
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:04:23PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
>
> sometime in the far distant future, paleontologists will be debating
> the classic questions like: Which came first? The compiler or the OS?
>
Pencil and paper was enough to code up the design for the Zuse
computer
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:56:33PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> There isn't one. To bootstrap "source only" you must first have a
> compiler which requires a working compiler which requires a bootstrap
> ... so you need a running Linux system somewhere. [You _can_ build on
> another Unix or
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:34:01PM -0700, Shadow wrote:
> Hi, All.
>
> A crazy idea came to me to install Debian Sarge 3.1r2 from source.
> I bought that 3DVD set, but found that there is no installer on
> those disks...
>
> Q1: in general, what is the process of installing debian from source?
Th
Take a look at Debian From Scratch:
http://people.debian.org/~jgoerzen/dfs/html/dfs.html
http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/01/10/1727246
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:34:01PM -0700, Shadow wrote:
> Q1: in general, what is the process of installing debian from source?
> Q3: can I use my Debian Sarge 3.1r0a binary set for that?
> Q4: maybe I can just use some mini-distribution like DfS to load the
> debian-installer and proceed with my s
Serena Cantor wrote:
> Sorry for replying so late. I'm not taking you advice.
> I decide to install win98 over win2k for other
> reasons.
Eek! Win98?! ;-)
> I wish I could find out the reason why grub
> fails. I study Linux+winnt howto, didn't find much
> useful info. My hard disk is quite small
Serena Cantor wrote:
> Thanks! English is my 2nd language.
No problem.
However, I would suggest that you send replies to the list, not just to
whoever responds. This way:
* others who have more information can add to the conversation.
* others who are looking for the same answers as you can re
Serena Cantor wrote:
> I have win2k and sarge on hda3 and use grub to dual
> boot.
> Then I re-partition hda3 and re-install sarge, sarge's
> installation program find win2k, so I let grub
> install to MBR. Later, I find I can't boot win2k,
> win2k complains some files missing.
>
>
Saying that
I have win2k and sarge on hda3 and use grub to dual
boot.
Then I re-partition hda3 and re-install sarge, sarge's
installation program find win2k, so I let grub
install to MBR. Later, I find I can't boot win2k,
win2k complains some files missing.
Pls help!
Am 2006-05-25 21:40:39, schrieb Liudmila Yafremava:
>
> Hello!
> using only floppies. I made attempts to install both potato
> and sarge that way, with the same result: after booting with a
> linux boot floppy, the machine demands a root floppy but
> never releases the floppy drive (it continues
Hello, Digby and Kevin!
So far the agreement between you guys and my other linux-friends seems to
be that I should pull the hard drive and install on another system. I will
do that as a last resort, because I will probably have a nightmare of a
time configuring it on the libretto with all the
Hello Luda,
> So far the agreement between you guys and my other linux-friends seems to
> be that I should pull the hard drive and install on another system. I will
> do that as a last resort, because I will probably have a nightmare of a
> time configuring it on the libretto with all the devic
Hi Liudmila,
I have Debian (amoungst other things) running on a Libretto 110CT.
It is a nice little machine once you get it installed, but as you
have discovered, one of the more challenging install targets...
The PCMCIA floppy is of limitted use for installation, because
it is PCMCIA and only t
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:40:39PM -0500, Liudmila Yafremava wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I have been trying to install Sarge on Toshiba Libretto 110ct
> for weeks with no success. I gravely need someone to take me
> through it, as I feel that I've tried everything and can't
> think of anything else to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My problem is the same that he has
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/09/msg00842.html
Star King of the Grape Trees escribió:
> Mario de Frutos Dieguez wrote:
>
>> I have the same problem.
>>
> What problem? This is why it is good practise to
Mario de Frutos Dieguez wrote:
I have the same problem.
What problem? This is why it is good practise to provide at least *some*
context.
Why can we install in a HP Netserver LH4 the 2.6.x kernel?
Hmm? Didn't know that, sounds good though.
Where can i download woody-vanilla distro?
I have the same problem.
Why can we install in a HP Netserver LH4 the 2.6.x kernel?
Where can i download woody-vanilla distro?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Søren Christensen wrote:
> I'm going to install Sarge on a notebook, I need to retain Win XP, so I
> must do a repartition, where do I find "ntfsresize" ?
It's built into the debian installer which I assume you plan to use to
install sarge. Simply select a partition in the partitioning program and
I used KNOPPIX 4.0 to do my partition resizing. ntfresize and fdisk.
Just check out google for exact instructions.
http://www.google.com/search?hs=UXH&hl=en&lr=&client=firefox&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aunofficial&q=ntfsresize+xp+windows+dual+boot&btnG=Search
Thanks,
Keith.
On Mon, 2005-12-05
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 07:34:08AM +0100, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> So what I was thinking about doing was to use the etch installer which
> has a 2.6.12 kernel in which I believe there is support for this SATA
> controller but then select to install the sarge distribution. Any
> ideas if this will w
In-Reply-To=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Daniel,
I found a Sarge image with 2.6.12 at:
http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/amd64/
that worked for me. I had to modprobe the ata_piix module,
but after that it worked fine.
Roy
--- "Kretzer, Jason R (Big Sandy)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will soon be installing sarge on a box with a Xeon
> processor and 2GB
> of RAM. Is there anything special I need to know?
> Does the processor
> need a special kernel? Will that kernel recognize
> that amount of RAM?
>
> Tha
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:13:39PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >>>I will soon be installing sarge on a box with a Xeon processor and 2GB of
> >>>RAM. Is there anything special I need to know? Does the processor need a
> >>>special kernel? Will that kernel recognize tha
On 8/24/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, don't. Compile your own kernel that has the 4GB_RAM support
> enabled. None of the packaged Debian kernels have it. Without it you
> will only get access to about 900 MB.
>
>From the /boot/config-2.6.8-2-686-smp:
#
# Firmware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>>I will soon be installing sarge on a box with a Xeon processor and 2GB of
>>>RAM. Is there anything special I need to know? Does the processor need a
>>>special kernel? Will that kernel recognize that amount of RAM?
>>>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:28:04PM -0400, Kretzer, Jason R (Big Sandy) wrote:
> OK, could you point me to a resource that would show me how to do this?
>
Here:
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
If you are not sure what options you need, then simply take the
/boot/config-x.y
OK, could you point me to a resource that would show me how to do this?
Thanks,
-Jason
-Original Message-
From: Roberto C. Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:23 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: installing sarge on server
On Wed, Aug 24
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:57:38AM -0400, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> On 8/24/05, Kretzer, Jason R (Big Sandy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I will soon be installing sarge on a box with a Xeon processor and 2GB of
> > RAM. Is there anything special I need to know? Does the processor need a
> >
On 8/24/05, Kretzer, Jason R (Big Sandy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I will soon be installing sarge on a box with a Xeon processor and 2GB of
> RAM. Is there anything special I need to know? Does the processor need a
> special kernel? Will that kernel recognize that amount of RAM?
>
T
Rick Pasotto said:
>
> That certainly makes sense but HOW DO I DO IT? The installer gives me no
> option either to format (select fstype) the logical volumes nor to
> specify a mount point. The installer creates the volume groups and
> logical volumes but then does nothing with them.
When I set up
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 05:37:37PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:23:31PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 09:29:15PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > > After that, you go back to the partitioner and then the new LVM
> > > logical volume
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:23:31PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 09:29:15PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > After that, you go back to the partitioner and then the new LVM
> > logical volumes will appear at the bottom of the list. Then you
> > select them one at a ti
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 09:29:15PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:48:42PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> > >
> > > I can second this -- don't put / or /boot under LVM control, just /'s
> > > large subdir
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:48:42PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> >
> > I can second this -- don't put / or /boot under LVM control, just /'s
> > large subdirectories, like /usr, /var, /home, etc, but not /bin,
> > /sbin, /lib, or other
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 11:46 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:39:03PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > > I'm confused by the sarge installer. I have a single 250g hard
> > > drive that I would like to manag
Ryan Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wednesday 29 June 2005 11:46 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
| > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:39:03PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
| > > I'm confused by the sarge installer. I have a single 250g hard drive
| > > that I would like to manage entirely with lvm. T
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 11:46 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:39:03PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > I'm confused by the sarge installer. I have a single 250g hard drive
> > that I would like to manage entirely with lvm. The installer wants to
> > partition the drive *b
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:39:03PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I'm confused by the sarge installer. I have a single 250g hard drive
> that I would like to manage entirely with lvm. The installer wants to
> partition the drive *before* configuring lvm but I thought that
> partitions existed within
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 17:16 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I'm not worried about more updates. I expect that. I just want to be sure
> that it is already being treated like stable -- i.e. I can count on updates
> not breaking anything.
I've been running it for months. Nothing's broken yet. It see
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:24:28PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I have two production systems that I've been working with. Right now they
> are
> on Mepis while I'm testing. I want to change both over to straight Debian
> for stability. I know Sarge is due to be declared stable in about a week
On Monday 30 May 2005 03:36 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:24:28PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > I have two production systems that I've been working with. Right now
> > they are on Mepis while I'm testing. I want to change both over to
> > straight Debian for stabilit
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:24:28PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I have two production systems that I've been working with. Right now they
> are
> on Mepis while I'm testing. I want to change both over to straight Debian
> for stability. I know Sarge is due to be declared stable in about a week
Mitja Podreka wrote:
I think the best/easyest way is to download the base system install CD
or the first Sarge CD and do a base install. Then you configure ADSL
with pppoeconf and change the /etc/apt/sources.list to include the
nearest Debian repository.
After this you can install everything you
I think the best/easyest way is to download the base system install CD
or the first Sarge CD and do a base install. Then you configure ADSL
with pppoeconf and change the /etc/apt/sources.list to include the
nearest Debian repository.
After this you can install everything you want.
--
To UNSUBSC
Carlos Rodrigues writes:
> ...I was wondering if it is possible to do a network install using PPPoE.
> My ADSL modem is ethernet based, so there is no need for special drivers
> and such, just being able to do PPPoE authentication.
You just need to get the base system.
--
John Hasler
--
To UN
on Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 12:11:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:38:25 -0500, "Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > understand is the soon-to-be official "sarge" release..) and I could not
> > > find the basedbs.ta
>
> You really don't need the latest version of gcc in order to install
> Sarge,
> no matter what install technique you use. All the stuff that you need to
> install the OS is already compiled in a self consistent way. Once you
> have
> Sarge installed, you get the latest gcc for further work,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:55:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > I looked at my copy of debinst rc2 CD. It has deb package of wget and
> > udeb package of debootstrap on it in directory named pool. I believe
> > udeb is a compact and stripped down version of a regular deb, so it
> > p
>
> I looked at my copy of debinst rc2 CD. It has deb package of wget and
> udeb package of debootstrap on it in directory named pool. I believe
> udeb is a compact and stripped down version of a regular deb, so it
> probably has all you need for chroot, plus a lot of stuff that you
> might not n
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 09:07:52PM -0500, cga wrote:
> The new net install system is currently the best Debian has for install
> over small pipes. If you can get the iso image of net install downloaded
> and burnt to CD, you can get the rest of the stuff you need by using it.
> Even if you can't ge
The new net install system is currently the best Debian has for install
over small pipes. If you can get the iso image of net install downloaded
and burnt to CD, you can get the rest of the stuff you need by using it.
Even if you can't get it downloaded over your pipe, I recommend that you
try to p
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 12:11:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:38:25 -0500, "Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > understand is the soon-to-be official "sarge" release..) and I could not
> > > find the basedbs.tar file.
> >
> > Ther
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:38:25 -0500, "Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > understand is the soon-to-be official "sarge" release..) and I could not
> > find the basedbs.tar file.
>
> There's no such animal for sarge.
>
> > I also noticed that the section "Installing
> > ... could not find the basedbs.tar file.
>
> There's no such animal for sarge.
>
> > I also noticed that the section "Installing
> > Debian GNU/linux from a UNIX/linux System" in the "testing" Installation
> > Guide does not exist.
>
> Sure it does. http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> understand is the soon-to-be official "sarge" release..) and I could not
> find the basedbs.tar file.
There's no such animal for sarge.
> I also noticed that the section "Installing
> Debian GNU/linux from a UNIX/linux System" in the "testing" Installation
> Guide does
Ricky Clarkson wrote:
> I would guess that either both CDROMs are faulty (unlikely) or that
> the machine's RAM or hard drive are faulty (more likely). You can
> test both, but I don't know how.
I would have thought that the most likely issue would be the CD-ROM
drive itself, since they are notor
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:00:19 +0100
Ricky Clarkson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would guess that either both CDROMs are faulty (unlikely) or
> that the machine's RAM or hard drive are faulty (more likely).
> You can test both, but I don't know how.
Both CDROMs are rather old - so that may be the
I would guess that either both CDROMs are faulty (unlikely) or that
the machine's RAM or hard drive are faulty (more likely). You can
test both, but I don't know how.
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:37:13 -0500, C. Tresenriter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to get Sarge installed on an ASUS A7V8X-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 February 2004 01:08 pm, Jordi Carrillo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am new to the Debian distribution.
> I would like to know if I can install sarge (testing) straight away
> by using the isos from debian (using jigdo) without installing woody
>
* David Gaudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Philippe Makowski wrote:
> > is the official installation cd of sarge
> > (http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a nforce2
> > chipstet motherboard (especially networking adaptator) ?
> > is there a success story ?
>
> I have
Hoyt Bailey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:53:26PM +0100, Philippe Makowski wrote:
is the official installation cd of sarge
(http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a
nforce2
chipstet motherboard (especially networking adaptator) ?
AFAIK, the nforce2 ethernet adaptor r
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:15:29AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> On, Tue, Nov 04, 2003, Jamin Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:53:26PM +0100, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> > > is the official installation cd of sarge
> > > (http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 00:18
Subject: Re: installing sarge with nforce2
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:53:26PM +0100, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> > is the of
Philippe Makowski wrote:
Le Mardi 4 Novembre 2003 00:31, Roberto Sanchez a écrit :
Philippe Makowski wrote:
is the official installation cd of sarge
(http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a nforce2
chipstet motherboard (especially networking adaptator) ?
is there a succes
Le Mardi 4 Novembre 2003 00:31, Roberto Sanchez a écrit :
> Philippe Makowski wrote:
> > is the official installation cd of sarge
> > (http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a nforce2
> > chipstet motherboard (especially networking adaptator) ?
> > is there a success story ?
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:53:26PM +0100, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> is the official installation cd of sarge
> (http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a nforce2
> chipstet motherboard (especially networking adaptator) ?
AFAIK, the nforce2 ethernet adaptor requires the nVid
Philippe Makowski wrote:
> is the official installation cd of sarge
> (http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a nforce2
> chipstet motherboard (especially networking adaptator) ?
> is there a success story ?
I haven't had any luck with the network adapters. However, I'm s
Philippe Makowski wrote:
is the official installation cd of sarge
(http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/) working with a nforce2
chipstet motherboard (especially networking adaptator) ?
is there a success story ?
The nForce2 chipset requires a binary-only driver from nVidia. You need
to
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:34:08AM -0500, Donald R. Spoon wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >The installer for sarge is being completely ripped out and replaced.
> >Please don't expect it to be useful yet. If you want to install sarge or
> >sid, install woody and upgrade (from the CD if you like).
>
Colin Watson wrote:
> -SNIP- <
>
> The installer for sarge is being completely ripped out and replaced.
> Please don't expect it to be useful yet. If you want to install sarge or
> sid, install woody and upgrade (from the CD if you like).
>
How far along in the process at this moment? Any "ro
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:01:29PM -0700, Matthew Ewanchuk wrote:
> I have d\l both CD1 of sarge and sid, but neither will boot correctly. I
> get a syslinux 1.75 prompt, but there does not seem to be a way to select
> different versions. If you hit enter, you just get the continous looping
>
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 16:01, Matthew Ewanchuk wrote:
> I have d\l both CD1 of sarge and sid, but neither will boot correctly. I
> get a syslinux 1.75 prompt, but there does not seem to be a way to select
> different versions. If you hit enter, you just get the continous looping
> error after
78 matches
Mail list logo
