At 06:39 AM 12/27/1998 -0600, Gordon von Miller wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Would installation be any easier on a separate hard drive?
>
>TIA
>
>Gordon
Just my opinion, but YES. For one thing, it gives you one more level of
removal from doing something wrong and hosing your existing setup.
There's really n
If you did want to use the same drive with Windows, you would need to
create a partition with FIPS or a similar partition making program. You
would then create a Linux partition and install there. Many people do this
and this is no problem, except when they need more space, which will
always happen
Not until they fix LILO to install on the MBR of /dev/hda instead of the
MBR of the drive linux is on.
On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Gordon von Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would installation be any easier on a separate hard drive?
>
> TIA
>
> Gordon
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAI
Jim,
Before my harddrive crash, I had installed SUSE, and it was a major
hassle to get the disk partitioned correctly. I now have Windows on the
hard drive, and I would think that it would be very difficult to put Linux on
it to
share with W95. So, I thought it might be simpler to get a inexp
Gordon,
Installation won't be any easier on a separate hard drive. Selecting where
to install Linux is only one small part of the installation. Perhaps you
can clarify your question?
On Sun, Dec 27, 1998 at 06:39:58AM -0600, Gordon von Miller
wrote: > Hello,
>
> Would installation be any easier
5 matches
Mail list logo
