Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-11 Thread Махно
I upgraded all machines to 6.1.0-15-amd64 (6.1.66-1). Works great and no problems! 2023-12-11, pr, 18:47 Махно rašė: > > I upgraded all machines to 6.1.0-15-amd64 (6.1.66-1). Works great and > no problems! > > > 2023-12-11, pr, 18:40 Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> rašė: > > > > On 11 D

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-11 Thread Махно
I upgraded all machines to 6.1.0-15-amd64 (6.1.66-1). Works great and no problems! 2023-12-11, pr, 18:40 Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> rašė: > > On 11 Dec 2023 11:34 -0500, from g...@extremeground.com (Gary Dale): > > Pleased to note that 6.1.0-15 seems to have hit the mirrors now. I

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-11 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 11 Dec 2023 11:34 -0500, from g...@extremeground.com (Gary Dale): > Pleased to note that 6.1.0-15 seems to have hit the mirrors now. I assume > this is the fixed version. It certainly should be, but some people have reported other issues with the new 12.4 upgrade. See other recent posts to this

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-11 Thread Gary Dale
On 2023-12-09 13:09, Dan Ritter wrote: https://fulda.social/@Ganneff/111551628003050712 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 The new kernel release is reported to contain an ext4 data corruption bug. It's prudent not to upgrade, or if you have started to upgrade, not to re

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 02:27:38PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 13:09:23 -0500 > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > https://fulda.social/@Ganneff/111551628003050712 > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 > > > > The new kernel release is reported to contain

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Charles Curley
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 13:09:23 -0500 Dan Ritter wrote: > https://fulda.social/@Ganneff/111551628003050712 > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 > > The new kernel release is reported to contain an ext4 data > corruption bug. It's prudent not to upgrade, or if you have > sta

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread tomas
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:36:52PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023, 12:47 PM Curt wrote: [...] > > It is the notion of simultaneity itself (the now of now) that is > > relative rather than universal. > > > > I thought metaphysics was off-topic for this group. Moderators!!

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023, 12:47 PM Curt wrote: > On 2023-12-10, Gary Dale wrote: > > > > On 2023-12-10 12:24, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM -, Curt wrote: > >>> On 2023-12-10, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > "Now" is almost exactly Sun 10 Dec 16:55:43 UTC 2023 > >

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Curt
On 2023-12-10, Gary Dale wrote: > > On 2023-12-10 12:24, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM -, Curt wrote: >>> On 2023-12-10, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: "Now" is almost exactly Sun 10 Dec 16:55:43 UTC 2023 >>> You mean in the Zulu Time Zone (as I am all at sea)? >>

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Gary Dale
On 2023-12-10 11:56, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 11:50:18AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote: On 2023-12-09 14:18, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 9 Dec 2023 20:54 +0200, from ale...@nanoid.net (Alexis Grigoriou): I just upgraded to Bookworm this morning. I did reboot a couple of times b

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Gary Dale
On 2023-12-10 12:24, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM -, Curt wrote: On 2023-12-10, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: "Now" is almost exactly Sun 10 Dec 16:55:43 UTC 2023 You mean in the Zulu Time Zone (as I am all at sea)? Use "date -u" to see current UTC time. That sho

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread John Hasler
Andy writes: > This fails with leap seconds, potentially, and also TAI astronomical > time seems to be its own animal. TAI isn't good enough for the astronomers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrestrial_Time -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread tomas
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:20:40PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM -, Curt wrote: > > On 2023-12-10, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > > > > "Now" is almost exactly Sun 10 Dec 16:55:43 UTC 2023 > > > > You mean in the Zulu Time Zone (as I am all at sea)? > >

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM -, Curt wrote: > On 2023-12-10, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > > "Now" is almost exactly Sun 10 Dec 16:55:43 UTC 2023 > > You mean in the Zulu Time Zone (as I am all at sea)? Use "date -u" to see current UTC time. That should be sufficient to let you know

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM -, Curt wrote: > On 2023-12-10, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > > "Now" is almost exactly Sun 10 Dec 16:55:43 UTC 2023 > > You mean in the Zulu Time Zone (as I am all at sea)? > > > Andy > > (amaca...@debian.org) > > > > > Not this again :) GMT (was) the

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Curt
On 2023-12-10, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > "Now" is almost exactly Sun 10 Dec 16:55:43 UTC 2023 You mean in the Zulu Time Zone (as I am all at sea)? > Andy > (amaca...@debian.org) > >

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 11:50:18AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote: > On 2023-12-09 14:18, Michael Kjörling wrote: > > On 9 Dec 2023 20:54 +0200, from ale...@nanoid.net (Alexis Grigoriou): > > > I just upgraded to Bookworm this morning. I did reboot a couple of > > > times but there seems to be no problem (

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Gary Dale
On 2023-12-09 14:18, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 9 Dec 2023 20:54 +0200, from ale...@nanoid.net (Alexis Grigoriou): I just upgraded to Bookworm this morning. I did reboot a couple of times but there seems to be no problem (yet). Is there anything I should look for or do other than rebooting? If

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-10 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 9 Dec 2023, at 19:18, Michael Kjörling wrote: > If you are on 6.1.55-1 (or earlier), just hold off on > upgrades for now; and if you need to upgrade something else, take > great care for now to ensure that no Linux kernel packages get > upgraded to any version < 6.1.66, and preferably not < 6.1

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Joe
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 19:18:20 + Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote: > On 9 Dec 2023 20:54 +0200, from ale...@nanoid.net (Alexis Grigoriou): > > I just upgraded to Bookworm this morning. I did reboot a couple of > > times but there seems to be no problem (yet). Is there anything I >

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 9 Dec 2023 14:26 -0500, from g...@wooledge.org (Greg Wooledge): >> If you upgraded this morning, then I would expect that you are okay >> for now. > > That doesn't appear to be true. > >> Per #5 in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 >> the bug is present in kernel Debian

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Richmond
Greg Wooledge writes: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 07:18:20PM +, Michael Kjörling wrote: >> If you upgraded this morning, then I would expect that you are okay >> for now. > > That doesn't appear to be true. > >> Per #5 in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 >> the bug is p

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 07:18:20PM +, Michael Kjörling wrote: > If you upgraded this morning, then I would expect that you are okay > for now. That doesn't appear to be true. > Per #5 in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 > the bug is present in kernel Debian package ve

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 9 Dec 2023 20:54 +0200, from ale...@nanoid.net (Alexis Grigoriou): > I just upgraded to Bookworm this morning. I did reboot a couple of > times but there seems to be no problem (yet). Is there anything I > should look for or do other than rebooting? If you upgraded this morning, then I would ex

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Alexis Grigoriou
On Sat, 2023-12-09 at 13:09 -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > > > The new kernel release is reported to contain an ext4 data > corruption bug. It's prudent not to upgrade, or if you have > started to upgrade, not to reboot, until a new kernel release > is prepared. > I just upgraded to Bookworm this m

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Markus Schönhaber
09.12.23, 19:09 +0100, Dan Ritter: > https://fulda.social/@Ganneff/111551628003050712 > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 > > The new kernel release is reported to contain an ext4 data > corruption bug. It's prudent not to upgrade, or if you have > started to upgrade, n

Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release

2023-12-09 Thread Nate Bargmann
Thanks for the tip. I updated this morning well before any announcements and having seen this I rebooted into the 6.1.0-12 (6.1.52) package. Good thing old kernels are kept around. - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is t

Re: [IMPORTANT] Debian images no longer works for GPU driver installation with apt update

2023-08-29 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:53:35AM -0700, Wenyan Hu wrote: > Hi Team, > > Google's GPU driver installation no longer works for Debian images since > 08/23/2023. > > Google is using > https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gpus/install-drivers-gpu#installation_scripts > to > install GPU drivers on

Re: Important and Confidential

2015-04-06 Thread John L. Ries
I used to find 419 solicitations rather amusing (yes, it's possible to be both evil and amusing at the same time), but now the creativity has pretty much gone out of them, so they no longer even have any entertainment value. --| John L. Ries | Salford Syste

Re: Important and Confidential

2015-04-06 Thread Lee Winter
No. If you ask again me answer will be _HELL_NO_. Please go eat something poinsonous and die in agony. Have a bad day. On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:20 PM, VACCATION TOUR < jamesmithvaccati...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm sharing some private and important documents with you, kindly click >

Re: Important to me

2011-03-07 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:52:21 +0100, beno hamid wrote: > 1 - I am bad in writing bug > 2 - And the worst in the English...[?] > > I want to clarify a point abou joystick linux There is a problem in > several gamepad on the market ...Specifically.. .th Axis, > The initial value of some Axis is Unr

Re: Important to me

2011-03-06 Thread Klistvud
Dne, 06. 03. 2011 22:52:21 je beno hamid napisal(a): 1 - I am bad in writing bug 2 - And the worst in the English...[?] I want to clarify a point abou joystick linux There is a problem in several gamepad on the market ...Specifically.. .th Axis, The initial value of some Axis is Unreal...!!

Re: Important question.

2010-12-20 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Gabriela Jiménez wrote: Dear Debian.Org Support Team: I am a new user of Linux O.S., and I need to use Linux to use RDP protocol to connect with a Server with Windows 2008 Server to use an business application. Debian have a RDP tool similar to Windows RDP ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wik

Re: Important question.

2010-12-20 Thread Pablo Sánchez
Gabriela, you can also try remmina . Regards Pablo Sánchez. Dear Debian.Org Support Team:   I am a new user of Linux O.S., and I need to use Linux to use

Re: Important question.

2010-12-20 Thread Klistvud
Dne, 20. 12. 2010 16:26:51 je Gabriela Jiménez napisal(a): Dear Debian.Org Support Team: I am a new user of Linux O.S., and I need to use Linux to use RDP protocol to connect with a Server with Windows 2008 Server to use an business application. Debian have a RDP tool similar to Windows RD

Re: Important question.

2010-12-20 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, Gabriela Jiménez wrote: I am a new user of Linux O.S., and I need to use Linux to use RDP protocol to connect with a Server with Windows 2008 Server to use an business application. Debian have a RDP tool similar to Windows RDP ? # aptitude show rdesktop Package: rdesktop State: not insta

Re: Important question.

2010-12-20 Thread Umarzuki Mochlis
2010/12/20 Gabriela Jiménez > Dear Debian.Org Support Team: > > > > I am a new user of Linux O.S., and I need to use Linux to use RDP protocol > to connect with a Server with Windows 2008 Server to use an business > application. Debian have a RDP tool similar to Windows RDP ? > > > rdesktop

Re: Important commands lose permissions after upgrades.

2009-10-09 Thread Jochen Schulz
Nuno Magalhães: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:52, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> Jochen Schulz put forth on 10/9/2009 1:57 AM: >>> >>> I hate hard disks. Never trust them, irrespective of their age. >> >> I second that. > > Thanks for the input but i can't see how hard-drive failiure would > make specif

Re: Important commands lose permissions after upgrades.

2009-10-09 Thread Nuno Magalhães
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:52, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Jochen Schulz put forth on 10/9/2009 1:57 AM: >> >> I hate hard disks. Never trust them, irrespective of their age. > > I second that. Thanks for the input but i can't see how hard-drive failiure would make specific system commands lose permiss

Re: Important commands lose permissions after upgrades.

2009-10-08 Thread Jochen Schulz
Nuno Magalhães: > Jochen Schulz: >> The first thing I would do in your situation is to make sure my disk >> isn't dying. Run a forced fsck on all filesystems (including /) and use >> smartctl (packege: smartmontools) to check your disk for errors. > > Erhm... the drive's fairily recent, it's a "Ma

Re: Important commands lose permissions after upgrades.

2009-10-08 Thread Nuno Magalhães
2009/8/25 Nuno Magalhães : >> The first thing I would do in your situation is to make sure my disk >> isn't dying. Run a forced fsck on all filesystems (including /) and use >> smartctl (packege: smartmontools) to check your disk for errors. > > Erhm... the drive's fairily recent, it's a "Maxtor 16

Re: Important commands lose permissions after upgrades.

2009-08-25 Thread Nuno Magalhães
> The first thing I would do in your situation is to make sure my disk > isn't dying. Run a forced fsck on all filesystems (including /) and use > smartctl (packege: smartmontools) to check your disk for errors. Erhm... the drive's fairily recent, it's a "Maxtor 160GB SATA II 7200RPM 8Mb Cache" fr

Re: Important commands lose permissions after upgrades.

2009-08-25 Thread Jochen Schulz
Nuno Magalhães: > > This is the second apt-get dist-upgrade that i've done recently and > the second time i get this issue. After the upgrade, many important > commands lose permissions (i.e. chmod 000), which has caused me weird > boots and sometimes nagging the lists with incorrect problems - li

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-10 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, April 9, 2008 2:23 pm, Chris Bannister wrote: > Yeah, but it makes it more difficult for new Debian users to get > answers to their problems if you *also* have reply to list as Policy. In > fact, the more I think about it, the more illogical it seems. Which is moot since D-U does not n

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-09 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:05:56AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:57:30AM -0400, steve wrote: > > can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been > > getting this junk no less than ten times a day for lord knows how long. > > Debian-user is an open l

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-08 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian McKee wrote on 2008-04-07 22:07: > On 7-Apr-08, at 3:05 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: >>> I believe the technique you're looking for is "greylisting". >> >> I know the concept of greylisting. Are you sure, that we do want >> greylinsting on debi

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-07 Thread Bob Cox
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 16:07:55 -0400, Brian McKee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 7-Apr-08, at 3:05 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: >>> I believe the technique you're looking for is "greylisting". >> >> I know the concept of greylisting. Are you sure, that we do want >> greylinsting on debian? D

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-07 Thread Brian McKee
On 7-Apr-08, at 3:05 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: I believe the technique you're looking for is "greylisting". I know the concept of greylisting. Are you sure, that we do want greylinsting on debian? Do we want that poor lads on dial-up have to dial-up several times in order to send a simple,

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-07 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Sherohman wrote on 2008-04-07 17:44: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:43:56PM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: >> IIUC, you propose that there is a special way for non-subscribers to >> post, that locks out spammers at the same time? How should that

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-07 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:43:56PM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > IIUC, you propose that there is a special way for non-subscribers to > post, that locks out spammers at the same time? How should that work? > > The only thing I could imagine, is one of those silly 'type the letters > that you

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-07 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johannes Wiedersich wrote on 2008-04-07 14:31: >> I understand the issue about not wanting to limit posters to the list of >> subscribers. However, perhaps there should be a whitelist or somthing >> to which non-subscribers can post with the same han

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-07 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Douglas A. Tutty wrote on 2008-04-07 02:40: > Of course, > > Quoting the spam when you complain about spam just confuses the spam > filter so that it will think such mail is legitimate. > > > I understand the issue about not wanting to limit posters

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:16:02AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > is there any way to do this with mail, maybe if it was a header I could > then wget the report as spam link. Don't really want to open a browser > to do this [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
Of course, Quoting the spam when you complain about spam just confuses the spam filter so that it will think such mail is legitimate. I understand the issue about not wanting to limit posters to the list of subscribers. However, perhaps there should be a whitelist or somthing to which non-subs

Re: spam filters (was Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!)

2008-04-06 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
steve wrote: > Ill just add > his address to a filter, his address changes constantly, I have 10 > emails from him in my inbox just from the last 24 hours, each from a > different address, but the same mail;. pain in the $#% he is. This is not the correct method. Most of the times (99/100) the

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thierry Chatelet wrote: | | Go there: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ find the message and click on | the button "Report as spam" on the top right of the page. | Thierry | | Done! I dont read the list mail there, so I never knew about it, tha

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Steve Lamb
Thierry Chatelet wrote: well to the list on the net and mark it as a spam. There is no moderator on this list. You are incorrect. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:10:38AM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2008 00:04:34 Alex Samad wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:05:56AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:57:30AM -0400, steve wrote: > > > > can the moderator please remove this idiot

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On Monday 07 April 2008 00:04:34 Alex Samad wrote: > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:05:56AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:57:30AM -0400, steve wrote: > > > can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been > > > getting this junk no less than ten times a

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Alex Samad
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:05:56AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:57:30AM -0400, steve wrote: > > can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been > > getting this junk no less than ten times a day for lord knows how long. > [snip] > > (And, in an at

Re: Spam filters (was Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS blah blah)

2008-04-06 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/06/08 15:09, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 11:05:15 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >>> can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been >>> getting this junk no less than ten times a day for lord knows how long. >>>

Re: Spam filters (was Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS blah blah)

2008-04-06 Thread Steve Kemp
On Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 11:05:15 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been > > getting this junk no less than ten times a day for lord knows how long. > > ~ Thank you. > > Tbird/Icedove has a spam filter. Are you using it? A client-side

Re: Spam filters (was Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS blah blah)

2008-04-06 Thread steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Johnson wrote: | On 04/06/08 10:57, steve wrote: |> can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been |> getting this junk no less than ten times a day for lord knows how long. |> ~ Thank you. | | Tbird/Icedove has a spam filt

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Sherohman wrote: | On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:57:30AM -0400, steve wrote: |> can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been |> getting this junk no less than ten times a day for lord knows how long. | | Debian-user is an ope

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On Sunday 06 April 2008 17:57:30 steve wrote: > Mohammed Ali wrote: > | You're invited to: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE > | READ AND REPLY!! > | By your host: Mohammed Ali > | > | Date: Sunday April 6, 2008 > | Time: 12:00 pm -

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:57:30AM -0400, steve wrote: > can the moderator please remove this idiot from the list?? Ive been > getting this junk no less than ten times a day for lord knows how long. Debian-user is an open list which can be posted to by anyone, whether a list member or not. The s

Spam filters (was Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS blah blah)

2008-04-06 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/06/08 10:57, steve wrote: > Mohammed Ali wrote: > | > | You're invited to: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU > PLEASE > | READ AND REPLY!! > | By your host: Mohammed Ali > | > | Date: Sunday April 6, 2008 >

Re: IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE READ AND REPLY!!!!!!

2008-04-06 Thread steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mohammed Ali wrote: | | You're invited to:IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION FOR YOU PLEASE | READ AND REPLY!! | By your host: Mohammed Ali | | Date: Sunday April 6, 2008 | Time: 12:00 pm - 1

Re: IMPORTANT: intel Q965 problem still remain

2007-10-19 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:44:21PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote: > Hello > > I am encountering a problem with the i810 driver on > etch to manage ich8 q965 intel driver. > When I switch from consol to X display the display > become unsyncronised > > After trying a 2.6.22 image via backport, the

Re: Important

2004-10-05 Thread dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: From David Knell: E-mail address changed Hi - Owing to the unbelievable amount of spam coming in to this account (6000+ pieces over the space of one weekend) I've changed my e-mail address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please forward the e-mail you've just sent me to my ne

Re: IMPORTANT WARNING! Re: I'm too stupid to use find, can someone help me out, please?

2004-07-06 Thread Joerg Johannes
Am Di, den 06.07.2004 schrieb Hendrik Boom um 16:39: > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:36:06AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/$ find . -type l -exec rm {}; > > > > By now other have answered your wustion, but: > > VERY IMPORTANT: > > when yo are debugging a shell comma

Re: Re: Important

2004-04-17 Thread Autoresponder
Success! Your email address has been added to our subscription list for the P4 update newsletter. There is no fixed publication schedule for this newsletter; it will be sent out each time there is new information about P4/P5 cards. P4 UPDATE DTV has started turning off its HU card datastre

Re: Re: Important

2004-04-15 Thread Autoresponder
Success! Your email address has been added to our subscription list for the P4 update newsletter. There is no fixed publication schedule for this newsletter; it will be sent out each time there is new information about P4/P5 cards. P4 UPDATE DTV has started turning off its HU card datastre

Re: Re: important document

2004-03-28 Thread lusker
Your email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with subject "Re: important document" had an attachment named "document.zip" An automatic program has determined that this is an executable attachment. This is a common indication of a virus or worm. Your message has not been delivered

Re: Important notify about your e-mail account.

2004-03-02 Thread Pascal Hakim
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 06:16:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello user of Debian.org e-mail server, > > Your e-mail account will be disabled because of improper using in next > three days, if you are still wishing to use it, please, resign your > account information. > > For more

Re: IMPORTANT: My email address has changed, please resend your message.

2003-08-28 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Thursday 28 August 2003 13:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have been forced to change my email address due to being bombarded by > spam & viruses (I was receiving hundreds of bogus emails per day). Please > resend your message to me at my new email address of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for any

Re: Need GNU-based live CD [WAS - Re: Important!]

2003-07-24 Thread Patrick Albuquerque
Sunil wrote up a step by step account of modifying Knoppix at: http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue87/sunil.html HTH, Patrick. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Important!

2003-07-23 Thread Preston Boyington
Title: RE: Important! > > On Wednesday 23 July 2003 23:59, rayhab wrote: > > I need to get an operating system to fit on one rw cd. > You can try knoppix. It's based on debian. For more > information look at > http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html >

Need GNU-based live CD [WAS - Re: Important!]

2003-07-23 Thread Kent West
Henning Moll wrote: On Wednesday 23 July 2003 23:59, rayhab wrote: I need to get an operating system to fit on one rw cd. You can try knoppix. It's based on debian. For more information look at http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html There you will also find information where to get i

Re: Important!

2003-07-23 Thread Henning Moll
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 23:59, rayhab wrote: > I need to get an operating system to fit on one rw cd. You can try knoppix. It's based on debian. For more information look at http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html There you will also find information where to get iso-images... Regards Henn

Re: IMPORTANT: security hole in colorize in unstable

2001-10-29 Thread Gergely Nagy
My bad. I screwed up fakeroot on my system, hence the bad ownerships. Fixed package will be in incoming within a few minutes. pgphYxeHN31Er.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Important Package Not Found In Sid!?!

2001-02-14 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I am trying to do a new installation of sid (a.k.a unstable). I >selected the packages I wanted using dselect and a number of the gnome >packages I selected (including gnome-panel, gnome-core, gnome-session >and gnome-terminal) were dependant upon the package libgnomeui33

Re: **IMPORTANT** Slink sendmail and libdb2

1998-10-28 Thread Rene Hojbjerg Larsen
John Goerzen wrote: > Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> They default to /etc/mail, except for aliases.db, which should be in /etc >> (Debian Policy, 4.5). > > I know what policy says, but this is not how it works. mailertable, > etc. are in /etc and not /etc/mail. You can put the

Re: **IMPORTANT** Slink sendmail and libdb2

1998-10-28 Thread Remco van de Meent
On Wed, Oct 28, 1998 at 03:39:51PM -0500, Richard A Nelson wrote: : Without parsing /etc/mail/sendmail.mc, I can't tell what type of encoding : is used for the databases, so I don't think I can do the makemaps : automagically ;-{ People can't be obligated not to edit sendmail.cf, instead of us

Re: **IMPORTANT** Slink sendmail and libdb2

1998-10-28 Thread Richard A Nelson
ases, so I don't think I can do the makemaps automagically ;-{ -- Rick Nelson On 28 Oct 1998, John Goerzen wrote: > Date: 28 Oct 1998 13:02:19 -0600 > From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian

Re: **IMPORTANT** Slink sendmail and libdb2

1998-10-28 Thread John Goerzen
Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 08:35:35AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > : Would it be possible for the sendmailconfig to update these databases? > : It wouldn't be that hard, I think. Also, how about updating the defailts > : so that they are stored

Re: **IMPORTANT** Slink sendmail and libdb2

1998-10-27 Thread Remco van de Meent
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 08:35:35AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: : Would it be possible for the sendmailconfig to update these databases? : It wouldn't be that hard, I think. Also, how about updating the defailts : so that they are stored in /etc/mail instead of /etc? They default to /etc/mail,

Re: **IMPORTANT** Slink sendmail and libdb2

1998-10-27 Thread John Goerzen
Would it be possible for the sendmailconfig to update these databases? It wouldn't be that hard, I think. Also, how about updating the defailts so that they are stored in /etc/mail instead of /etc? John Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The last update of sendmail switched from lib

Re: IMPORTANT Correction: The real Debian.org

1997-10-27 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Actually, the first test case has already been won, and I doubt there will > be a second The first test case was not sufficiently general. There must be more of them to overturn the law. Thanks Bruce -- Can you get your operating system fixed

Re: IMPORTANT Correction: The real Debian.org

1997-10-27 Thread Britton
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 07:18:27PM -0500, Dave Cinege wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Oct 1997 23:54:15 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > >On Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 12:25:56PM -1000, Jimen Ching wrote: > > >> > > >> 2. To the users, it's so pitiful that use

Re: IMPORTANT Correction: The real Debian.org

1997-10-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 07:18:27PM -0500, Dave Cinege wrote: > On Sun, 26 Oct 1997 23:54:15 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > >On Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 12:25:56PM -1000, Jimen Ching wrote: > >> > >> 2. To the users, it's so pitiful that users of a distribution is so > >> quick to kick out a DEVEL

Re: IMPORTANT Correction: The real Debian.org

1997-10-26 Thread Dave Cinege
On Sun, 26 Oct 1997 23:54:15 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: >On Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 12:25:56PM -1000, Jimen Ching wrote: >> >> 2. To the users, it's so pitiful that users of a distribution is so >> quick to kick out a DEVELOPER just because he disagrees with the leader. > >Please notice that Dav

Re: IMPORTANT Correction: The real Debian.org

1997-10-26 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 12:25:56PM -1000, Jimen Ching wrote: > > 2. To the users, it's so pitiful that users of a distribution is so > quick to kick out a DEVELOPER just because he disagrees with the leader. Please notice that Dave Cinege is NOT a debian developer. He does not maintain a package

Re: IMPORTANT: RSA Data Security Challenge participants please read

1997-03-07 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Bruce Perens wrote: > From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Today, RC5. Tomorrow, DES. Next > > week, Phil Zimmerman's a free man. (Oh well, we can dream...) > > The government dropped its case against Zimmerman long ago. > That is true, but he is still be "peste

Re: IMPORTANT: RSA Data Security Challenge participants please

1997-02-28 Thread Jonas Bofjall
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Carl Privitt wrote: > How did "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" become _the_ Linux group? These guys > don't even have a web server or actual hosts in their domain. Now if Has linuxnet stepped forward somewhere and declared what they will do with the money when (if) they win? Are we su

Re: IMPORTANT: RSA Data Security Challenge participants please read

1997-02-27 Thread Marcelo E. Magallón
Bruce, I feel I have to reply after reading some follow ups, including yours. > It was OK for us to participate as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the RSA Data > Security Challenge as long as we didn't have any chance of beating > the "Linux" group. It looks as if we do have a chance. It would be real Wel

Re: IMPORTANT: RSA Data Security Challenge participants please

1997-02-27 Thread Carl Privitt
At 07:03 PM 25/02/97 PST, Bruce Perens wrote: >It was OK for us to participate as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the RSA Data >Security Challenge as long as we didn't have any chance of beating >the "Linux" group. It looks as if we do have a chance. It would be real How did "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" become _th

Re: IMPORTANT: RSA Data Security Challenge participants please read

1997-02-27 Thread Bruce Perens
> Bruce, don't spend all your time worrying about how Debian is going to > be viewed by the rest of the Linux community. Uh, sorry, this is my job within the project. We've been really careful to maintain good relations with the other Linux distributions and free software producers. Messing them u

Re: IMPORTANT: RSA Data Security Challenge participants please read

1997-02-27 Thread Brian C. White
> From: "John T. Larkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Harvey Mudd should be producing somewhere between 3 and 4 M kps by > > tomarrow. Right now, most of us are running under [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > but we can change that if Bruce still disagrees with our possition. > > I asked the people at Zero to lu

Re: IMPORTANT: RSA Data Security Challenge participants please read

1997-02-27 Thread Jim Pick
Bruce: > From: Mike Neuffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So far the only thing that Bruce accomplished with his uncoordinated > > action is that numerous hosts dropped entirely out of the key-search. > > Big deal. They have years to go. We might ask ourselves some questions > about this kind of public

  1   2   >