On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:03:00AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> ... In fact, such recording itself is useful as an antispam measure.
> One tactic is to deny (non-permanent error) the first connection that
> a mail server, any server, makes to your host. Most servers will wait
> through a time
> on Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:46:28PM +0100, Patrick Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to put together a web data base to allow people identify
> > which machines are the primary routes of spam into our Inboxes.
get the ip# of the spammer and check it against the e
on Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:46:28PM +0100, Patrick Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to put together a web data base to allow people identify
> which machines are the primary routes of spam into our Inboxes.
>
> Does anyone have a useful link? Spamcop seem to have a fine l
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
[...]
I'm trying to put together a web data base to allow people identify
which machines are the primary routes of spam into our Inboxes.
That's a rather big project If you're trying to put something together
to aid people in filtering stuff, only doing this is not
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Patrick Kirk wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm trying to put together a web data base to allow people identify
>which machines are the primary routes of spam into our Inboxes.
That's a rather big project If you're trying to put something together
to aid people in filtering stuff, o
5 matches
Mail list logo