On 18 September 2013 12:51, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> Is x86 enough for you? If so, http://libcpuid.sourceforge.net/
>
> If you need to check across architectures, you probably need to
> go all the way to autoconf for maximum flexibility.
>
> -dsr-
Nice lib, Dan. Thanks!
--Beco
--
Dr Beco
A.I. re
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:53:03AM -0300, Beco wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Please, can I get something like the 'Extended brand string' from
> cpuid to identify a cpu using C language?
>
> Of course, not using system("cpuid") :) Something more "cross-platform".
>
Is x86 enough for you? If so, http://
Hi Guys,
Please, can I get something like the 'Extended brand string' from
cpuid to identify a cpu using C language?
Of course, not using system("cpuid") :) Something more "cross-platform".
Cheers,
Beco
--
Dr Beco
A.I. researcher
"Sometimes the heart sees what is invisible to the eye." (H.
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> On 9/8/13, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Now, if only people would notice Intel processors are actually identified
> > by
> > the signature (cpuid(1).EAX) *and* the platform id bits in MSR 17 (the "pf"
> > or processor flags)...
>
> I had spent
at bottom :-
On 9/8/13, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Now, if only people would notice Intel processors are actually identified
> by
> the signature (cpuid(1).EAX) *and* the platform id bits in MSR 17 (the "pf"
> or processor flags)...
I had spent quite sometime on the output generated by
Now, if only people would notice Intel processors are actually identified by
the signature (cpuid(1).EAX) *and* the platform id bits in MSR 17 (the "pf"
or processor flags)...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In t
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:17:36AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> cpuid is the best if you are looking for any sort of detailed info.
>
> See http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=106956 for details.
> --
Looks cool :) anyway thanks.
--
software engineer
Rajagiri school of engineering an
great tool!
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:47 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> cpuid is the best if you are looking for any sort of detailed info.
>
> See http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=106956 for details.
> --
> Regards,
> Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
> My quotes in
On 9/2/2013 6:11 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 9/1/2013 9:44 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Pascal Hambourg
>>> wrote:
Richard Owlett a écrit :
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> So I fail to see why your kn
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/1/2013 9:44 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Pascal Hambourg
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Owlett a écrit :
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> So I fail to see why your knowing the "CPU bus width" is relevant to
>
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 9/1/2013 8:09 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/31/2013 10:00 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Especially as I explicitly emphasized wanting to know bus width.
[snip]
You're confusing register width with data bus width. Register width
dictates which bina
On 9/1/2013 9:44 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Pascal Hambourg
> wrote:
>> Richard Owlett a écrit :
>>> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
So I fail to see why your knowing the "CPU bus width" is relevant to
anything.
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly some processors can
On 9/1/2013 8:09 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 8/31/2013 10:00 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>>> Especially as I explicitly emphasized wanting to know bus width.
>>
>> I find it curious Richard that you emphasize this, given that the "CPU
>> bus width" in isolation is meanin
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Richard Owlett a écrit :
>> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>
>>> So I fail to see why your knowing the "CPU bus width" is relevant to
>>> anything.
>>
>> If I understand correctly some processors can run 32 bit OSes but
>> not any 64 bit OS.
>
> Thi
Richard Owlett a écrit :
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> So I fail to see why your knowing the "CPU bus width" is relevant to
>> anything.
>
> If I understand correctly some processors can run 32 bit OSes but
> not any 64 bit OS.
This has nothing to do with bus width.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/31/2013 10:00 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Especially as I explicitly emphasized wanting to know bus width.
I find it curious Richard that you emphasize this, given that the "CPU
bus width" in isolation is meaningless.
Every x86 CPU since the original Pentium that ship
On 8/31/2013 10:00 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Especially as I explicitly emphasized wanting to know bus width.
I find it curious Richard that you emphasize this, given that the "CPU
bus width" in isolation is meaningless.
Every x86 CPU since the original Pentium that shipped in 1993, up to the
Richard Owlett wrote:
I'll be installing Debian 7.1 on two unrelated sets of machines.
I have no record of the cpu in any of the machines. Is there a
utility to identify the processors, particularly bus width. All
machines originally ran various 32 bit MS Windows incarnations.
[snip]
The best a
Richard Owlett wrote, on 08/29/2013 15:25:
> I'll be installing Debian 7.1 on two unrelated sets of machines. I have no
> record of the cpu in any of the machines. Is there a utility to identify the
> processors, particularly bus width. All machines originally ran various 32 bit
> MS Windows incarn
On Friday 30 August 2013 16:23:26 John wrote:
> How about Children in Kindergarten through 6th Grade.
>
> John Graves
>
> On 8/30/2013 11:19 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 August 2013 14:25:35 Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> K-6 children
> >
> > What are K-6 children??
This is an internation
How about Children in Kindergarten through 6th Grade.
John Graves
On 8/30/2013 11:19 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 29 August 2013 14:25:35 Richard Owlett wrote:
K-6 children
What are K-6 children??
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Thursday 29 August 2013 14:25:35 Richard Owlett wrote:
> K-6 children
What are K-6 children??
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201308301619.39
Le 29/08/2013 15:25, Richard Owlett a écrit :
I'll be installing Debian 7.1 on two unrelated sets of machines. I
have no record of the cpu in any of the machines. Is there a utility
to identify the processors, particularly bus width. All machines
originally ran various 32 bit MS Windows incarna
On Thursday 29 August 2013 07:28 PM, staticsafe wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:25:35AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> I'll be installing Debian 7.1 on two unrelated sets of machines. I
>> have no record of the cpu in any of the machines. Is there a utility
>> to identify the processors, parti
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:25:35AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'll be installing Debian 7.1 on two unrelated sets of machines. I
> have no record of the cpu in any of the machines. Is there a utility
> to identify the processors, particularly bus width. All machines
> originally ran various 32
25 matches
Mail list logo
