| Cox Cable did the same thing with port 80 soon after Code Red
| struck. Yet another reason why I hate MSFT and lusers.
|
| At the same time, they decided to be really anal and block port
| 25, too. Bah!
|
>From the COX support pages FAQ
Question:
What ports do you block?
Answer:
We blo
-- Gerald Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 10 October 2002, 04:35 PM -0500):
> On 10 Oct 2002 11:24:36 -0500
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200
> > > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi ya
attbi is trying to prevent users from running servers at home
( think its a hopeless problem but they can keep trying
i say, sooner or later, tv signals from lot more tv viewers
will pay the price since they all share the same cable...
( another il-concieved idea?? - good enough for now
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:35:36PM -0500, Gerald Livingston wrote:
> Time Warner blocked 80 here but they are polite enough to scan 25 for
> open relays. From the rejected messages in Exim it appears that if they
> find one they will at least inform you before locking it down. (Messages
> deleted
On 10 Oct 2002 11:24:36 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200
> > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I know it's rather silly to reply on your on post, but I did some
> > more research...
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is slightly offtopic, but I didn't got a relevant answer in other
> > places, so I thought lets ask my debian friends ;)
> >
> > I had my apache
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> I know it's rather silly to reply on your on post, but I did some more
> research... It seems that our M$ using friends have some problems.
> Win2k/XP have a filesharing protocol on 445, and because most users of
> M$ products are so
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200
Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is slightly offtopic, but I didn't got a relevant answer in other
> places, so I thought lets ask my debian friends ;)
>
> I had my apache listening on port 445 for https connections, this
> worked perfect
Hi,
I'm with Force9 and although they don't officially support Linux, they do have
an FAQ and several of the users are using Linux. They also have a linux server
where you can get a shell and you have a cgi-bin directory to play with.
The address is www.force9.co.uk, give them a go.
--
Andy Hol
Robert wrote:
> Dont forget your small neighborhood ISP's. The smaller they are the better
> the service and the more knowledgeable (most of the time?) the employees.
> Robert
Tremendously good advice. If you know your ISP's sysadmin, you're set. (If
he's a debian developer, you're _really_ set. I
On 08 Jun 1999, F.P. Groeneveld wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> : Are there any nationwide ISPs around for Linux users? I'm using AOL,
> : which doesn't support Linux, and there aren't any Linux ISPs in my area.
> : It'd make it a lot easier on me for upgrading if I could get onto the
> :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Are there any nationwide ISPs around for Linux users? I'm using AOL,
: which doesn't support Linux, and there aren't any Linux ISPs in my area.
: It'd make it a lot easier on me for upgrading if I could get onto the
: internet. Does anyone know of anything like this?
On 3 Jun 1999, Colin Marquardt wrote:
> Starting with pppd-2.3.7, you don?t even need the DNS addresses. Search
> for the option "usepeerdns" in /usr/doc/ppp/README.gz and take a look
> at /usr/doc/ppp/examples/scripts/ip-up.local.add
This only works if the other end is set up to give you the DNS
* Michael Procario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> support site, but you do not even need those. You need the DNS server
> addresses and the phone number. I use wvdial (its comes with Debian) to do
> the
Starting with pppd-2.3.7, you don´t even need the DNS addresses. Search
for the option "use
I use Netcom (now Mindspring) they have pages on using Linux buried in their
support site, but you do not even need those. You need the DNS server
addresses and the phone number. I use wvdial (its comes with Debian) to do the
dialup and it is very simple.
_
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Robert wrote:
> Dont forget your small neighborhood ISP's. The smaller they are the better
> the service and the more knowledgeable (most of the time?) the employees.
> Robert
Just a mention My sister, who lives in my house, had an AOL account,
but once I pretty much bann
Dont forget your small neighborhood ISP's. The smaller they are the better
the service and the more knowledgeable (most of the time?) the employees.
Robert
At 10:59 AM 6/1/99 -0700, George Bonser wrote:
>
>1. AOL is not an ISP. They are an "Online Content Provider" that also
>allows their users so
Any ISP which can use plain vanilla Windows Dialup Networking ought to (in
general anyway) work. Examples I've used
Netcom / Mindspring
Earthlink
AT&T
MCI
IBM
Baby Bells (regional phone company)
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any nationwide ISPs around for Linux users
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 12:42:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any nationwide ISPs around for Linux users? I'm using AOL, which
> doesn't support Linux, and there aren't any Linux ISPs in my area. It'd make
> it a lot easier on me for upgrading if I could get onto the internet.
19 matches
Mail list logo
