Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> ... or is it the following ok?
>
>Firewalling, ala IPCop's port forwarding setup.
>
>That is, we have a firewall in IPCop (or similar) and outside access to ANY
>internal machine is still restricted by what is port forwarded? If yes, then
>I am sure that would be
On Jul 21, 2011, at 3:29 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
Johan Kullstam writes:
[…]
My ISP does not offer IPv6.
And in the case of NAT'ed IPv4, it's still possible to register
for a free-of-charge tunnel service at http://sixxs.net/ and use
AICCU (# apt-get install aiccu.
> Johan Kullstam writes:
[…]
> My ISP does not offer IPv6.
With a static IPv4 address, setting up 6to4 is as simple as
adding a bit to interfaces(5), like:
## An 6to4 tunnel
auto 6to4
iface 6to4 inet6 v4tunnel
## IPv4 address: 192.0.2.34
## $ printf 2002:%x%02x:%x%
Rick Thomas writes:
> On Jul 19, 2011, at 6:13 PM, John Hasler wrote:
>
>> Go Linux writes:
>>> How is [IPv6] going to work on DIALUP!
>>
>> I wrote:
>>> Just fine. What makes you think it wouldn't?
>>
>> Johan Kullstam writes:
>>> The fact that it doesn't work anywhere else? :->
>>
>> Works fi
On Jul 19, 2011, at 6:13 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Go Linux writes:
How is [IPv6] going to work on DIALUP!
I wrote:
Just fine. What makes you think it wouldn't?
Johan Kullstam writes:
The fact that it doesn't work anywhere else? :->
Works fine here.
Here too.
What kind of problems ar
Go Linux writes:
> How is [IPv6] going to work on DIALUP!
I wrote:
> Just fine. What makes you think it wouldn't?
Johan Kullstam writes:
> The fact that it doesn't work anywhere else? :->
Works fine here.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
John Hasler writes:
> Go Linux writes:
>> How is [IPv6] going to work on DIALUP!
>
> Just fine. What makes you think it wouldn't?
The fact that it doesn't work anywhere else? :->
> --
> John Hasler
--
Johan KULLSTAM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:25:47PM +0200, Arno Schuring wrote:
> William Hopkins (we.hopk...@gmail.com on 2011-07-12 17:29 -0400):
> > On 07/12/11 at 08:50pm, Arno Schuring wrote:
> > > As of this moment, it is not recommended to run IPv6-only networks,
> > > dual-stack is preferred. Not in the lea
William Hopkins (we.hopk...@gmail.com on 2011-07-12 17:29 -0400):
> On 07/12/11 at 08:50pm, Arno Schuring wrote:
> > As of this moment, it is not recommended to run IPv6-only networks,
> > dual-stack is preferred. Not in the least because most of the
> > Internet is not yet reachable over v6 (sadly
On 14/07/11 01:00, Craig Small wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:23:00AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> What I've wanted is for avahi-daemon to do dynamic DNS updates into forward
>> and reverse based upon what it sees on the network. Or have radvd do this.
> It does that mdns update fine.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:23:00AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> What I've wanted is for avahi-daemon to do dynamic DNS updates into forward
> and reverse based upon what it sees on the network. Or have radvd do this.
It does that mdns update fine. I'be ssh'ed to server.local via IPv6 and
la
What I've wanted is for avahi-daemon to do dynamic DNS updates into forward
and reverse based upon what it sees on the network. Or have radvd do this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2011 à 20:48 +1000, Andrew McGlashan a écrit :
> Hi,
[...]
> Many using 3G USB modems are opening themselves up to abuse if (by
> default) having their machines directly connected to the Internet. Any
> machine that is directly accessible via the Internet _must_ have
> su
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:09:45PM +0100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 13/07/11 02:30, Laurence Hurst wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:09:27PM +0100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> Why not just use a single host file on your firewall/router?
> >>
>^^
On 13/07/11 02:30, Laurence Hurst wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:09:27PM +0100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Why not just use a single host file on your firewall/router?
>>
^^^
> I addition I need forward and reverse host-name lookups to
Hi,
Rick Thomas wrote:
+) It can be nice to be able to bypass the ISP-imposed NAT. You can SSH
directly into your home server without messing around with port
mapping. This has a security downside, of course, but the convenience
is nice.
Yes, but that can be a huge negative too. Any machi
Hello,
pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au a écrit :
>
> This is the killer for me. I want to be able to plug something into
> the network (usually an embedded board, with no console), and then be
> able to ssh to it by name. [...]
>
> With stateless configuration, there is no log of what is assigned, and
> "Rick" == Rick Thomas writes:
Rick> On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Laurence Hurst wrote:
>> I am only aware of using DHCP with DNS to achieve what I currently
>> do wrt reliable, cross-device, forward and reverse host lookups but
>> was wondering if there was a way to take advantage of IPv6
On 2011-07-12T16:58:33-0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> +) Getting your reverse DNS (IPv6 address -> name) supported outside
> of your home network is difficult/impossible. It's no problem, of
> course, *inside* the home network where you control the DNS server.
> [**]
[...]
> [**] I haven't found a g
On 07/12/11 at 08:50pm, Arno Schuring wrote:
> Laurence Hurst (l.a.hu...@lboro.ac.uk on 2011-07-12 11:54 +0100):
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I notice a couple of other IPv6 related questions on this list so I
> > hope this isn't too far of topic...
> [..]
> >
> > I am curious, if I wanted to translate
On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Laurence Hurst wrote:
I am only aware of using DHCP with DNS to achieve what I currently
do wrt reliable, cross-device, forward and reverse host lookups but
was wondering if there was a way to take advantage of IPv6's
stateless configuration to get the same e
Laurence Hurst (l.a.hu...@lboro.ac.uk on 2011-07-12 11:54 +0100):
> Hi folks,
>
> I notice a couple of other IPv6 related questions on this list so I
> hope this isn't too far of topic...
[..]
>
> I am curious, if I wanted to translate my IPv4 configuration into an
> IPv6 world;
As of this moment
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:09:27PM +0100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Why not just use a single host file on your firewall/router? DHCP
> always seems like overkill for equipment you own.
> eg. reserve static addresses 192.168.0.2-10 for your machines,
> 192.168.10-20 for people who regularly bring ma
On 12/07/11 23:46, Go Linux wrote:
> --- On Tue, 7/12/11, Laurence Hurst wrote:
>
>> From: Laurence Hurst
>> Subject: IPv6 and DNS
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2011, 5:54 AM
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I notice a couple of other IPv6 related questions on this
>> list so
Go Linux writes:
> How is [IPv6] going to work on DIALUP!
Just fine. What makes you think it wouldn't?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.or
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 06:46:08AM -0700, Go Linux wrote:
> --- On Tue, 7/12/11, Laurence Hurst wrote:
>
> And I'd like to add an IPV6 question to which I have not found an answer . . .
>
> How is it going to work on DIALUP!!! At least I have a good internal
> hardware modem . . .
The same wa
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Laurence Hurst wrote:
> From: Laurence Hurst
> Subject: IPv6 and DNS
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2011, 5:54 AM
> Hi folks,
>
> I notice a couple of other IPv6 related questions on this
> list so I hope this isn't too far of topic...
>
> I c
27 matches
Mail list logo
