Re: Not that simple (was Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading)

1998-12-10 Thread ferret
H. I've actually received files from behind my masquerade box. I'm not sure how the other person's set up. I have to have mine set for 'peer-to-peer' mode in order for it to connect to the server at all, and then have it set to go through a non-socks firewall. I do have all the masquerade hel

Not that simple (was Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading)

1998-12-06 Thread Guoqiang Dai
> [long boring :) text removed] You need to study a bit more into the subject to back yourself up before laughing at other people. > ICQ worked out of the box for me. I just did: > /sbin/ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -P all -D0.0.0.0/0 -S192.168.99.0/24 Of course you can make icq connect to icq ser

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-06 Thread Allan M. Wind
On 1998-12-05 11:43, Guoqiang Dai wrote: > > 2) socks can be used by a variety of other client software as well. > > I don't know much about socks, but can it support things like > realplayer, internet phone, etc? My impression is that socks is good for > access control, but you have to set every

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-05 Thread Guoqiang Dai
> 2) socks can be used by a variety of other client software as well. I don't know much about socks, but can it support things like realplayer, internet phone, etc? My impression is that socks is good for access control, but you have to set everything on the client side. (Well, I could be wrong o

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-04 Thread Joe Emenaker
>I got it to work successfully using ipautofw. I follow the instructions >on winroute site (www.winroute.com). Here is what I did: [ snip ] >"If you wish to run several ICQ clients in your LAN (and these clients >need to accept calls from other ICQ users), you have to create an entry >in the map

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-04 Thread Guoqiang Dai
Jens Ritter wrote: > > Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Paul Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > > > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I > > > don't > > > k

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-02 Thread Jens Ritter
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Paul Miller wrote: > > > > > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't > > know what to do with them or how. Can anyon

Fwd: Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-01 Thread Jay Barbee
I didn't see this come through the first time, so here is a repost. --Jay >Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 17:42:10 -0500 >To: "Paul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: Jay Barbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading > >At 11/30/98 02:42 PM

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-01 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Paul Miller wrote: > > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't > know what to do with them or how. Can anyone help? > My friends Windoze box has no problems with I

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-12-01 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 02:42:16PM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't > know what to do with them or how. Can anyone help? Well, it does work. If the pers

Fwd: Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

1998-11-30 Thread Jay Barbee
Just sharing with the list... --jay >At 11/30/98 02:42 PM -0500, you wrote: >> >>Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said >>something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't >>know what to do with them or how. Can anyone help? > >You need to