Re: Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1375824702.9032.0.camel@Petr

Re: ICQ with Linux

I have not tried ICQ or Jabber yet but you didn't mention Kopete and it manages them as it manages MSN and yahoo or other. Maybe give it a try ? Rodolfo Medina wrote: I've been following the various suggestions come from this list about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: my family want to

Re: ICQ with Linux (was: Chatting with Debian GNU/Linux)

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been following the various suggestions come from this list > about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: > my family want to use `messenger' and ICQ, and before resigning myself > to use MS Windows I wanted to check all the p

Re: ICQ with Linux (was: Chatting with Debian GNU/Linux)

On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 22:24 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been following the various suggestions come from this list > about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: > my family want to use `messenger' and ICQ, and before resigning myself > to use MS Windows I wanted to check all the possibil

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On March 1, 2003 10:09 am, ScruLoose wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:01:43AM -0800, Leo Spalteholz wrote: > > On February 28, 2003 11:09 pm, ScruLoose wrote: > > > Well, I went to apt-get.org and found a place to get Licq as a > > > .deb, and it works like a charm, straight outta the box. I >

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:01:43AM -0800, Leo Spalteholz wrote: > On February 28, 2003 11:09 pm, ScruLoose wrote: > > Well, I went to apt-get.org and found a place to get Licq as a > > .deb, and it works like a charm, straight outta the box. I still > > wouldn't mind knowing what caused the other

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On February 28, 2003 11:09 pm, ScruLoose wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:34:12PM -0500, Scruloose wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Using Trillian under windo~1 ... flawless ICQ > > connectivity... not using any port-forwarding or any such. Under > > debian, I can't seem to get a client to work. > >

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:34:12PM -0500, Scruloose wrote: > Hey all, > > Using Trillian under windo~1 ... flawless ICQ > connectivity... not using any port-forwarding or any such. Under debian, I > can't seem to get a client to work. > > GnomeICU will send and receive messages, initiate/accep

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:17:28PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote: > On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 13:34, Scruloose wrote: > --snip-- > > Needless to say, I'm using GnomeICU, 'cause it's limping along better than > > the competition. But how do I fix this? Is there some port I need to > > forward for the

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall

On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 13:34, Scruloose wrote: > GnomeICU will send and receive messages, initiate/accept chat mode, and > other people can see my status, but everybody always looks offline to me > (except 2 users, whose statuses update fine. No clue why they're special). > > GAIM just loses a hug

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall

On Sunday 16 February 2003 20:34, Scruloose wrote: > And Alicq seems to have imploded on install. Run it and it just exits > instantly with an error message (something about username or password not > supplied, IIRC), and when I edit its config file, I get one long line of > non-ascii garbage. No

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Paul Haesler wrote: > Ah forget it. It seems to work with outsiders - it's just transfers > between clients on the LAN that doesn't work. I don't think the problem is with the firewall, but with ICQ. ICQ 99 and earlier used a different protocol from ICQ 2000. When clients

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Paul Haesler wrote: > Ah forget it. It seems to work with outsiders - it's just transfers > between clients on the LAN that doesn't work. > > Of course there are better ways to transfer files on the LAN than > icq. But it makes it difficult to test things. Is there anyth

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 05:20:18PM +1000, Paul Haesler wrote: > > Tom Massey wrote: > > Have you tried using the ip_masq_icq module from > > ? I used it with a 2.2.19 > > kernel in a similar situation. > > I looked into that, but that URL doesn't work.

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

> Have you tried using the ip_masq_icq module from > ? I used it with a 2.2.19 > kernel in a similar situation. You need to add something like this to > your firewall script: I looked into that, but that URL doesn't work. You just get an html document

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

Paul Haesler wrote: > > Hi all, > > Look, I'm trying to get icq working on windoze client computers > on the private LAN through a Debian masquerading gateway > (ipchains - kernel 2.2.19). Have you tried using the ip_masq_icq module from ? I used it wit

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

Ah forget it. It seems to work with outsiders - it's just transfers between clients on the LAN that doesn't work. Of course there are better ways to transfer files on the LAN than icq. But it makes it difficult to test things. Is there anything I can do to the proxy server to make this sort o

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

> >It used to work with just port forwarding but since upgrading to > >icq 2000b, user to user file transfers and voice messages > >don't work anymore. > > > > My understanding is you need to specify in ICQ the ports to use and then > setup your portforwarding appropriately. Yeah I used to do t

Re: icq through masqueraded firewall /socks4

>It used to work with just port forwarding but since upgrading to >icq 2000b, user to user file transfers and voice messages >don't work anymore. > My understanding is you need to specify in ICQ the ports to use and then setup your portforwarding appropriately.

Re: ICQ and other applications for Linux???

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>it was written: > Does anyone know what protocols ICQ uses to send data out on the >internet? I am attempting to use my my linux machine as a router for my >cable internet service and was wondering if i would get full internet >funtionality on my client machines

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

"Kyle Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Hello everyone. I'm planning on changing my network router from Sygate 4.0 >on a Win NT 4.0 server to a debian ip masq machine. Right now, ICQ is >working excellent with sygate. How does it work with IP masq? When I set >the firewall rules, to I hav

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

> it works ...provided you configure ipmasq, i suggest using the ipmasq > module. > > http://www.tsmservices.com/masq/detailform.php3?124 > > it's not perfect but works.. > No, it does not work for me. When I do a depmod -a I get an error regarding unresolved symbols, and I get a lot of them w

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

quot; Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 12:29 AM Subject: Re: ICQ with debian firewall > Hi, > > try the icq module first. It did not work for me, so I had to do a > ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 10.161.67.65 4000 -R 192.168.1.1 4000 > > With this option, there is no need to recon

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

Hi, try the icq module first. It did not work for me, so I had to do a ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 10.161.67.65 4000 -R 192.168.1.1 4000 With this option, there is no need to reconfigure the icq clients. Even without this option, most parts of icq work, except filetransfer and some sort of cha

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

I have licq and micq running nicely here. On Sunday 10 December 2000 19:31, Nate Amsden wrote: > Kyle Peterson wrote: > > I looked into that module and from what I gather its doesn't work with > > ICQ 200, just ICQ99. The only way I can see is to use port forwarding. > > possible...i only use

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

Kyle Peterson wrote: > > I looked into that module and from what I gather its doesn't work with ICQ > 200, just ICQ99. The only way I can see is to use port forwarding. possible...i only use licq ..dont know if it works with other clients. nate -- ::: ICQ: 75132336 http://www.aphroland.org/ h

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

OTECTED]> Cc: "Debian Mailing List" Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 8:55 PM Subject: Re: ICQ with debian firewall > Kyle Peterson wrote: > > > > Hello everyone. I'm planning on changing my network router from Sygate 4.0 > > on a Win NT 4.0 server to a deb

Re: ICQ with debian firewall

Kyle Peterson wrote: > > Hello everyone. I'm planning on changing my network router from Sygate 4.0 > on a Win NT 4.0 server to a debian ip masq machine. Right now, ICQ is > working excellent with sygate. How does it work with IP masq? When I set > the firewall rules, to I have to open ports o

Re: ICQ

Daniel Burrows ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Can anyone recommend an ICQ app? I heard KICQ lacks a lot of feature and > won't let you create new accounts. gnomeicu works fine here. There is also licq which uses the *gulp* QT libs. :( HTH, Ron -- Email: Home:

Re: ICQ

Hoi Daniel! Daniel> Can anyone recommend an ICQ app? I heard KICQ lacks a lot of Daniel> feature and won't let you create new accounts. AFAIK the best graphical icq programs are kxicq and gnomeicu (which is in main/net). -- ...sutongi tti olleh /You will never amount to muc

Re: ICQ

On Mon, 08 May 2000, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anyone recommend an ICQ app? I heard KICQ lacks a lot of feature > and won't let you create new accounts. I personally use gnomeicu (http://gnomeicu.gdev.net/) which is well featured but I heard some people like ICQnix (http:/

Re: ICQ

On 08-May-2000 20:11:28 Ron Farrer wrote: > Daniel Burrows ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Can anyone recommend an ICQ app? I heard KICQ lacks a lot of >> feature and >> won't let you create new accounts. > > gnomeicu works fine here. There is also licq which uses the *gulp* > QT libs. You can

RE: ICQ

On 08-May-2000 20:54:16 Daniel Burrows wrote: > > Can anyone recommend an ICQ app? I heard KICQ lacks a lot of > feature and > won't let you create new accounts. Licq is great http://www.licq.org -- Andrew

Re: ICQ

On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:54:16PM +, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > Can anyone recommend an ICQ app? I heard KICQ lacks a lot of feature and > won't let you create new accounts. I'm using Everybuddy - since I have accounts with ICQ, AIM, *and* Yahoo Messenger, Everybuddy let's me do all of 'em fr

Re: ICQ

Daniel Burrows ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Can anyone recommend an ICQ app? I heard KICQ lacks a lot of feature and > won't let you create new accounts. gnomeicu works fine here. There is also licq which uses the *gulp* QT libs. :( HTH, Ron -- Email: Home:

Re: icq under firewall

I'm seeting up a firewall as well. The know about the ICQ problem and I've heard that the best solution is port forwarding (socks?). I'm not at that point yet but I have to deal with it... Port forwarding might be your answer (socks?) but please mail me your results... Thanks, Onno At 11:10 A

Re: ICQ Debian users?

"B. Szyszka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I was wondering if there are any Debian users here who use > ICQ and wouldn't mind me asking them questions if I had > problems. My ICQ number is 4982727 . Feel free to add me > to your list if you wouldn't mind. Thanks. : ) Dear Bart, I w

RE: ICQ client

> This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any > suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid of my old Win98 > box, but I keep it around for just that one thing. Please keep me CC'd, as I > don't subscribe to this list. Thanks. A great site on various ICQs for

Re: ICQ client

On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Nathan Sandver wrote: > This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any > suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid of my old I use MICQ. It's public domain and the latest version (0.3.4) is almost even stable - at least when it loses its

Re: ICQ client

I've been a zicq user for several months. Works great, if you don't use -O or -O2 optimisation to compile it. :> On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > > > > This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any > > suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid o

Re: ICQ client

If you want nice and graphical, you can use licq. If you like text based, micq is nice. I haven't any experience with the others, but .. trust me, they are out there. (A search of the web for licq and micq will turn up the others, I think.. :) On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 03:03:08PM -0700, Nathan Sandv

RE: ICQ client

On 28-Aug-99 Nathan Sandver wrote: > This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any > suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid of my old > Win98 > box, but I keep it around for just that one thing. Please keep me CC'd, > as I > don't subscribe to this list. Th

Re: ICQ client

gnomeicu is also a great one, is simple to use and looks great. works under X. is quite stable. On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Nathan Sandver wrote: > This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any > suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid of my old Win98 > box, bu

Re: ICQ client

> > This may be an FAQ, and I apologize if it is. Does anyone have any > suggestions for a good Linux ICQ client? I want to get rid of my old Win98 > box, but I keep it around for just that one thing. Please keep me CC'd, as I > don't subscribe to this list. Thanks. licq is a good replacement. Ni

RE: ICQ

On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote: > I have used the lick deb in the Debian distro to install licq. It > works fine on my potato box. Maybe you should install using the lick > deb instead of compiling it yourself? That is if you are running > Debian of course. Unless you want to play wi

RE: ICQ

Hi, I have used the lick deb in the Debian distro to install licq. It works fine on my potato box. Maybe you should install using the lick deb instead of compiling it yourself? That is if you are running Debian of course. The only problems I have with lick is that it easily "forget" settings you

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

On 02-Jun-99 Christian Lavoie wrote: > Sounds like you don't have the gnome-panel/orbit installed. > This is what I have installed: ii gnome-bin 1.0.9+pre10.2- Miscellaneous binaries used by Gnome ii gnome-libs-data 1.0.9+pre10.2- Data for Gnome libraries ii gnomeicu0.64-1

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

> I have it installed and I get this when I try to start it in KDE: > gnomeicu > type = 0 exid = (null) > ** CRITICAL **: file applet-widget.c: line 655 > (gnome_panel_applet_corba_init): assertion `panel_client != ((void *)0)' > failed. > ** CRITICAL **: file applet-widget.c: line 699 (applet_

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

On 01-Jun-99 Christian Lavoie wrote: >> For GnomeICU, I would have to switch to Gnome, from KDE, correct? > > As far as I recall, Debian allows for havin' both KDE and GNOME > installed at the same time. And anyway, you shouldn't need all of > gnome. Most probably the basic libs, and of course

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

> For GnomeICU, I would have to switch to Gnome, from KDE, correct? As far as I recall, Debian allows for havin' both KDE and GNOME installed at the same time. And anyway, you shouldn't need all of gnome. Most probably the basic libs, and of course gnomeICU itself. You shouldn't *need* to switc

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

On 01-Jun-99 Daniel González Gasull wrote: > Hi! > > Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> For GnomeICU, I would have to switch to Gnome, >> from KDE, correct? > > As far as I know you don't need so. But it's > recommended. If not you won't be able to drag and > drop between GnomeICU and o

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

Hi! Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For GnomeICU, I would have to switch to Gnome, > from KDE, correct? As far as I know you don't need so. But it's recommended. If not you won't be able to drag and drop between GnomeICU and other apps. Hope this helps. Bye :-) -- Daniel González Ga

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

On 01-Jun-99 Christian Lavoie wrote: > > GnomeICU is doing most what ICQ98 was doing on windows. Chat (no more > than 2 though, but that's the next update I think), File Transfert > (alpha state. Works but crashed the client afterwise. (GnomeICU > v0.64)) messages, UINs (beta state, has some t

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

On 01-Jun-99 Daniel González Gasull wrote: >> personally i prefer either kxicq > > Is it an ICQ clone for KDE? > Yes it is, for KDE. >> or licq (for x, anyway). i've had no problems >> with either losing messages or userlist entrieson >> meyet. > > I also have LICQ version 0.43, and I loss

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

> Hi! > "Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to know what are the good packages for > > ICQ people use in Debian. > Timothy Hospedales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have tried most of the ICQ clones > > available and I find that micq is the most stable!

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

Hi! "Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to know what are the good packages for > ICQ people use in Debian. Timothy Hospedales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have tried most of the ICQ clones > available and I find that micq is the most stable! Perhaps, but I

RE: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

personally i prefer either kxicq or licq (for x, anyway). i've had no problems with either losing messages or userlist entrieson meyet. On Sun, 30 May 1999, Timothy Hospedales wrote: > I have tried most of the ICQ clones available and I find that micq is > the most stable! And does the least

RE: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

I have tried most of the ICQ clones available and I find that micq is the most stable! And does the least weird stuff like loosing messages. The command line thing is quite neat also; I found it unexpectedly good to not have to click to recieve messages - saves lots of time! :). Unfourtunat

Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

>> "LOLZ" == Luiz Otavio L Zorzella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LOLZ> More than that, it looks like gtkicq is no longer in potato (why?), The package has been renamed to gnomeicu. Ciao, Martin

RE: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

On 31-May-99 Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to know what are the good packages for ICQ people use in > Debian. I've been using gtkicq for some time, and though I think it is > a nice package, I'm not sure as to how reliable it is... looks like I > never get to receive some m

Re: ICQ-Java not working after upgrade

>> "BGR" == Bruno Goncalves Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BGR> I've updated my system to potato, but now Icq-java doesn't work BGR> anymore. There is a fixed version of jdk1.1 in Incoming. Check the mirros file on www.debian.org where to find Incoming. Ciao, Martin

Re: ICQ Woes

On Sat, 8 May 1999, Lawrence Wickline wrote: What happened? Did you get an error message, and if so, what was it? I had to change the shell script that loaded it up a bit when I installed it - had to add "classes.zip" in my JDK diretory to the class library parameter. - bill > THe Java Portion O

Re: ICQ for Linux

On 15-Mar-99 Mark Phillips wrote: > >> P> of the find ICQ clones? I use Licq, but kicq and kxicq are also >> P> good ICQ clones for UNIX and Linux. >> >> My suggestion is gtkicq. Relly nice thing. It is packaged for slink. > > I have just downloaded gtkicq. It asked for registering informatio

Re: ICQ for Linux

> P> of the find ICQ clones? I use Licq, but kicq and kxicq are also > P> good ICQ clones for UNIX and Linux. > > My suggestion is gtkicq. Relly nice thing. It is packaged for slink. I have just downloaded gtkicq. It asked for registering information (I haven't used it before), and it appeared

Re: ICQ for Linux

>> "P" == Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: P> of the find ICQ clones? I use Licq, but kicq and kxicq are also P> good ICQ clones for UNIX and Linux. My suggestion is gtkicq. Relly nice thing. It is packaged for slink. Ciao, Martin

Re: ICQ for Linux

If you have slink installed then I suggest using GTKICQ which looks (more or less) identical to the mirabilis version for windoze Seems to work quite nicely for me to talk to people using mirabilis... bye John. Andrei Ivanov wrote: > > > What Linux version of ICQ? Do you mean the j

Re: ICQ for Linux

> What Linux version of ICQ? Do you mean the java version from Mirabilis or one > of the find ICQ clones? I use Licq, but kicq and kxicq are also good ICQ > clones for UNIX and Linux. Java version of ICQ is extremely buggy and extremely slow. Clones, on the other hand, are much better. I use mi

Re: ICQ for Linux

On 11-Mar-99 steven walsh wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Shawn Nguyen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone know where I can download the Linux version of ICQ? I've been >> looking around but can't seem to find it. Thanks for any help in advance. >> >> Shawn >> > Try www.freshmeat.net

Re: ICQ for Linux

On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Shawn Nguyen wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know where I can download the Linux version of ICQ? I've > been > looking around but can't seem to find it. Thanks for any help in advance. > > Shawn > Try www.freshmeat.net and search for ICQ "See you on the flip

Re: ICQ???

>> "c" == cooking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: c> Hi to all ! can someone tell me what and where a goo d ICQ for my c> Deb box would be :-) Thankyou I would use gtkicq from unstable. Ciao, Martin

Re: ICQ???

> -- > Hi to all ! can someone tell me what and where a goo d ICQ for my Deb box > would be :-) Thankyou That depends what you want to get. Many ICQ clones are at http://www.portup.com/~gyandl/icq/ Andrew / * Windows? What Windows?* * I may have

Re: ICQ

Well, it depends what features you want. If you want to stay in touch with friendsI'd suggest zicq. It's a nice small program, that does not take up almost any memory and CPU. Or, if you are a fan of 'Point and Click' get a Qt-based icq clone (cicq or gtkicq). ICQ-Jave from Mirabilis is not wor

Re: ICQ

Also check freshmeat.net there has been a few going throuh there lately. --- Mike Deal - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.zonenet.net / www.northwestextreme.com The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the world. On S

Re: ICQ

There are about 6 or 7 versions available.. I can't remember... the web page is at: http://www.portup.com/~gyandl/icq/ and also, I suggest everyone have a look at following web site: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~conradp/linux/test.html This is made by my uni's fellow linux gurus... On Sat, 19

Re: ICQ

One thing is for sure: ICQJava that Mirabilis offers as a 'Limited time free beta version' is a POS, pardon my language. Very minimum of basic features. Bugged (very interesting bug with keyboardthe faster you type, the more chances there are that your words will be messed up.) And it makes my

Re: Not that simple (was Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading)

H. I've actually received files from behind my masquerade box. I'm not sure how the other person's set up. I have to have mine set for 'peer-to-peer' mode in order for it to connect to the server at all, and then have it set to go through a non-socks firewall. I do have all the masquerade hel

FYI Re: ICQ and Other Apps over IP Masquerading

FYI http://dijon.nais.com/~nevo/masq/ The site above lists all the applications that have proven to work with ipmasq. Details have been gaven on how to make these apps work. ICQ is in "Chat Program" section. It seems that ipautofw is heavily used. What a sweet thing! I used to spend a lot of ti

Not that simple (was Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading)

> [long boring :) text removed] You need to study a bit more into the subject to back yourself up before laughing at other people. > ICQ worked out of the box for me. I just did: > /sbin/ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -P all -D0.0.0.0/0 -S192.168.99.0/24 Of course you can make icq connect to icq ser

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

On 1998-12-05 11:43, Guoqiang Dai wrote: > > 2) socks can be used by a variety of other client software as well. > > I don't know much about socks, but can it support things like > realplayer, internet phone, etc? My impression is that socks is good for > access control, but you have to set every

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

> 2) socks can be used by a variety of other client software as well. I don't know much about socks, but can it support things like realplayer, internet phone, etc? My impression is that socks is good for access control, but you have to set everything on the client side. (Well, I could be wrong o

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

>I got it to work successfully using ipautofw. I follow the instructions >on winroute site (www.winroute.com). Here is what I did: [ snip ] >"If you wish to run several ICQ clients in your LAN (and these clients >need to accept calls from other ICQ users), you have to create an entry >in the map

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

Jens Ritter wrote: > > Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Paul Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > > > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I > > > don't > > > k

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Paul Miller wrote: > > > > > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't > > know what to do with them or how. Can anyon

Fwd: Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

I didn't see this come through the first time, so here is a repost. --Jay >Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 17:42:10 -0500 >To: "Paul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: Jay Barbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading > >At 11/30/98 02:42 PM

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Paul Miller wrote: > > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't > know what to do with them or how. Can anyone help? > My friends Windoze box has no problems with I

Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 02:42:16PM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said > something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't > know what to do with them or how. Can anyone help? Well, it does work. If the pers

Re: Icq-java and jdk1.1-runtime

Hmm. Sorry, not familiar with that distribution of icq-java. I got mine from www.mirabilis.com/download All you need to do is gunzip|tar the file, and edit install file to specify the directory where your java files are. Try that. You won't need to uninstall wm too. HTH, Andrew __

Re: Icq-java and jdk1.1-runtime

On 01-Dec-98 Andrew Ivanov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The icq-java package refuse to install with the jdk1.1-runtime in slink. Any >> idea? > > Uhh, what is the problem? What are the errors it gives you? > Worked just fine here, with jdk 1.1.7 on hamm. > Andrew > > > __

Re: Icq-java and jdk1.1-runtime

> Hi, > > The icq-java package refuse to install with the jdk1.1-runtime in slink. Any > idea? Uhh, what is the problem? What are the errors it gives you? Worked just fine here, with jdk 1.1.7 on hamm. Andrew Never include a c

Fwd: Re: ICQ over IP Masquerading

Just sharing with the list... --jay >At 11/30/98 02:42 PM -0500, you wrote: >> >>Has anyone gotten ICQ to work over Linux IP Masquerading? Someone said >>something about telling Linux that ICQ uses ports 2000 to 4000, but I don't >>know what to do with them or how. Can anyone help? > >You need to

Re: ICQ for hamm?

On Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 12:38:19AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Without incoming connections, you can't do live talk or file transfer, > so it's nice to have. Well, not entirely true. You cannot have files sent to you and you cannot accept a live chat. You can, however, ask someone else to

Re: ICQ for hamm?

On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote: > > c) how difficult would it be to set it up on the Win95 machine and use the > > Debian box to forward it to the Internet? (where would I find the relevant > > information?) (I don't use forwarding, just wwwoffle for the web) > > Not difficult at all.

Re: ICQ for hamm?

On Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 05:14:01AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > > c) how difficult would it be to set it up on the Win95 machine and use the > > Debian box to forward it to the Internet? (where would I find the relevant > > information?) (I don't use forwarding, just wwwoffle for the web) > > No

Re: ICQ for hamm?

On Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 12:00:37AM +1100, Jiri Baum wrote: > b) how much of slink would I have to download for it to work? (it needs a > recent version of libc6 and a bunch of other things) (my modem is 9600) (is > the current slink reasonably OK?) Depends on which one you grab. There are act

Re: ICQ and clones

For most of them, you have to already have a UIN, it's a downside, but hey.. at least it works! Try getting a friend who has ICQ on a win9x machine to do it for you. On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Art Lemasters wrote: > > There's licq, but I have not found any way to use it to > register with the

Re: ICQ and clones

There's licq, but I have not found any way to use it to register with the ICQ server. Art On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 04:10:21PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Ruud de Bruin wrote: > > > > > Are there any "ready-to-use" ICQ programs available in .deb format? I > > would

Re: ICQ and clones

On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Ruud de Bruin wrote: > > Are there any "ready-to-use" ICQ programs available in .deb format? I > would rather use a ICQ clone (w/o the use of Java) because ICQ from > Mirabilis takes a lot of resources. > > regards, Ruud. Not that I know of, but try http://www.portup.com/~g

jdk 1.5 -> 1.6 incompatibilities? (was Re: ICQ Does Not Match the JDK?)

Art Lemasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm running slink. The JDK available appears to > conflict with the ICQ available. Is this the case, > and if so, is there an update for this on the way? > Thanks. I'm running this here without problems: ii jdk1.1-runtime 1.1.5v5-1 JDK 1.

Re: ICQ for Java [kinda off topic]

Kevin J Poorman way back on 12/18/97 wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering if any one here is useing ICQ that was released for > Java ... I'm having some problems setting it up... and would like > some help configureing it However it should probably be off list > > > Also has anyone tho

Re: ICQ for Java

> Has anyone got ICQ for Java to work? Yep I *had* it working perfectly... it was pretty neat. Somewhere in the process of upgrading to libc6 it broke and I haven't bothered to track down why yet. Adam. Internet Alaska - 4050 Lake Otis

  1   2   >