Debian and redhat sets on kernel config are slightly different. But with
the same config (just config from redhat) on a debian custom kernel,
nothing change.
so ... It's definitivly not a debian issue.
Thanks for support
Chris Bannister a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:54:53AM +0200, cyphe
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:54:53AM +0200, cypherstrong wrote:
> Ok After well testing on both system ... I have found that DB2 V9.5
> FixPack 0 doesn't work on 32 bits system properly
> Redhat sets automatically some sysctl value after installation:
>
> kernel.shmmax
>
> So that's why db2 don't c
Ok After well testing on both system ... I have found that DB2 V9.5
FixPack 0 doesn't work on 32 bits system properly
Redhat sets automatically some sysctl value after installation:
kernel.shmmax
So that's why db2 don't crash
I have do the same tuning on debian, and now installation work but ...
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:22:13PM +0200, cypherstrong wrote:
> Ok in fact what I have saw is this
>
> First, db2 start with 256m share memory ...
> So it's ok, they are be able to do it on both system
>
> Second, they try to change by following the memory of the system
> On redhat, it's ok
> On
Ok in fact what I have saw is this
First, db2 start with 256m share memory ...
So it's ok, they are be able to do it on both system
Second, they try to change by following the memory of the system
On redhat, it's ok
On debian, they don't do it properly
Perhaps it set a too high value
I have try
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:46:19AM +0100, cypherstrong wrote:
> I have already try to change it manually but DB2 auto rewrite the shmmax
> value
Even in redhat? But it works in redhat?
> I have try to start db2 and after set the shmmax, but they still crash
> with same error.
Annoying.
> Perha
I have already try to change it manually but DB2 auto rewrite the shmmax
value
I have try to start db2 and after set the shmmax, but they still crash
with same error.
Perhaps it's a bug of the db2 v9.5 fixpack 0 of ibm soft because older
version work fine without anything to do.
They is a way to
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:51:23AM +0100, Strong Cypher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for answer
>
> So here all collection I can do to find the problem :
>
> Yeah there is some difference ... perhaps I could try to copy the kernel
> config of redhat on a debian with the same version of kernel and see
Ok with the same kernel option set in a debian kernel like this :
apt-get source linux-image-`uname -r`
cp -r linux-`uname -r` linux-`echo $REDHAT_VERSION`
ln -s linux-`echo $REDHAT_VERSION` linux
cd linux
cp ~/config-`echo $REDHAT_VERSION` .config
echo "" | make oldconfig
make -kpkg --initrd kern
Hi,
Thanks for answer
So here all collection I can do to find the problem :
The redhat is a Redhat Enterprise 5 with 2.6.18-53.el5 kernel version
Here the firmware part :
#
# Firmware Drivers
#
CONFIG_EDD=m
CONFIG_EFI_VARS=y
CONFIG_DELL_RBU=m
CONFIG_DCDBAS=m
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:30:28AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:16:52AM +0100, Vincent Bachelier wrote:
> Can you explain:
>
> "all main think like HIMEM4G and 64BITS RESOURCE, is sets ..."
>
> Whats this "64BITS RESOURCE"?
>
> Is "uname -a" for redhat == "u
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:16:52AM +0100, Vincent Bachelier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a issue with IBM DB2 V9.5 (the express version) in 32 bits.
>
> I have install it on a 64 bits arch without any problem, on debian
>
> But in 32 bits, on a Bi-Xeon with 4g of ram, during installation they say
> "
12 matches
Mail list logo
