Grok Mogger wrote:
I have a question about the "wa" fields in vmstat, top, and the like. I
and someone else I know have both read a great deal about its meaning,
and have come to two different conclusions. Here are our
interpretations. Could someone please tell me which interpretation is
rig
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 13:59 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:43:50PM -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> >> In this interpretation, "wa" is really like "blocked" CPU time.
> >> The CPU has processes that are not really doing anything,
> >> because they
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:43:50PM -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
I have a question about the "wa" fields in vmstat, top, and the
like. I and someone else I know have both read a great deal
about its meaning, and have come to two different conclusions.
Here are our interpr
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:43:50PM -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> I have a question about the "wa" fields in vmstat, top, and the
> like. I and someone else I know have both read a great deal
> about its meaning, and have come to two different conclusions.
> Here are our interpretations. Could so
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:43:50PM -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> I have a question about the "wa" fields in vmstat, top, and the
> like. I and someone else I know have both read a great deal
> about its meaning, and have come to two different conclusions.
> Here are our interpretations. Could so
5 matches
Mail list logo