John Pearson wrote:
> I don't know what editor Mutt uses as a built-in default, but you
> can ask it to use whatever you like by adding a line like
> set editor=/usr/bin/joe
> or whatever to your .muttrc file.
Thanks a lot.
I think I'm to lazy to do "man mutt" or cd to /usr/doc/mutt.
Oki
On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 01:51:27AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 08:52:53AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> >
> > I think mutt is okay with me.
> > Problem is, how do you "justify" the lines? It's ^j in pine.
> > mutt's default editor is not vi, right?
>
> If you use vim, the
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 08:52:53AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
>
> I think mutt is okay with me.
> Problem is, how do you "justify" the lines? It's ^j in pine.
> mutt's default editor is not vi, right?
If you use vim, the key sequence "gq}" (sans quotes) will do that. nvi
doesn't seem to do that though
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 03:39:10PM -0800, aphro wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
>
> servis >Wouldn't it be better to use the pine*-src and pine*-diff Debian
> servis >packages? I believe that these create the necessary patches to fit it
> in
> servis >a Debian system and then bu
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 08:52:53AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote
>
>
> Daniel Mashao wrote:
> >
> > I once did it, but I forgot what I did. Searching the archives I could not
> > find pine installation messages. Anyone remember? I just can't get used to
> > mutt. It smells too much like vi and I find vi h
Daniel Mashao wrote:
>
> I once did it, but I forgot what I did. Searching the archives I could not
> find pine installation messages. Anyone remember? I just can't get used to
> mutt. It smells too much like vi and I find vi hard.
I think mutt is okay with me.
Problem is, how do you "justify"
Quoting Daniel Mashao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I once did it, but I forgot what I did. Searching the archives I could not
> find pine installation messages. Anyone remember? I just can't get used to
> mutt. It smells too much like vi and I find vi hard.
I must stop avoiding vi at once :-)
I just bu
on 18 Nov 99, Philip Lehman wrote...
The first message in this thread did not reach me, so I don't know
who initiated the query.
I am a novice and asked the same question . If you go to the archives
and look up Alec Smith's reply to me on 10th Nov, you will find a
fully detailed step by step gui
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
servis >Wouldn't it be better to use the pine*-src and pine*-diff Debian
servis >packages? I believe that these create the necessary patches to fit it in
servis >a Debian system and then builds a local pine*.deb. I haven't done this,
servis >but this is wh
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Daniel Mashao wrote:
>I once did it, but I forgot what I did. Searching the archives I could not
>find pine installation messages. Anyone remember? I just can't get used to
>mutt. It smells too much like vi and I find vi hard.
Get the source from any Debian mirror, last time
*- On 17 Nov, aphro wrote about "Re: How to install pine on slink from source"
> On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Daniel Mashao wrote:
>
> daniel >I once did it, but I forgot what I did. Searching the archives I
> could not
> daniel >find pine installation messages. Anyone rem
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Daniel Mashao wrote:
daniel >I once did it, but I forgot what I did. Searching the archives I could
not
daniel >find pine installation messages. Anyone remember? I just can't get used
to
daniel >mutt. It smells too much like vi and I find vi hard.
i install it on every slin
12 matches
Mail list logo
