Hernán Freschi wrote:
zhengda wrote:
Yes, the space the modules use isn't an issue. But I hope my system
can be started much faster (I think loading fewer modules makes the
system starting faster)
Yes, indeed. But you'll only notice it if the startup is very delayed
due to some strange mo
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 29.09.06 16:46, Hernán Freschi wrote:
I wonder what happens to modules when the system needs RAM? I know
Windows stupidly swaps the System memory by default (unless you enable
the DisablePagingExecutive option in the registry). Does linux force the
modules to
zhengda wrote:
Yes, the space the modules use isn't an issue. But I hope my system can
be started much faster (I think loading fewer modules makes the system
starting faster)
Yes, indeed. But you'll only notice it if the startup is very delayed
due to some strange module that delays startu
Hernán Freschi wrote:
Well I wouldn't worry too much about the number of loaded modules. That,
of course, assuming you are running a "modern" machine with several
hundreds megabytes of RAM. Modules use just a tiny fraction of RAM: 30,
40k ... the largest one for me being Reiserfs with 200k. B
On 29.09.06 16:46, Hernán Freschi wrote:
> I wonder what happens to modules when the system needs RAM? I know
> Windows stupidly swaps the System memory by default (unless you enable
> the DisablePagingExecutive option in the registry). Does linux force the
> modules to stay in RAM or does it tr
zhengda wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
yes, probably so. most of kernels get loaded when (first) used, but not
unloaded. I guess hotplug scripts load modules for every existing
piece of
hardware for the system to be able to use it. If you'd blacklist them,
you
won't be able to use the
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
yes, probably so. most of kernels get loaded when (first) used, but not
unloaded. I guess hotplug scripts load modules for every existing piece of
hardware for the system to be able to use it. If you'd blacklist them, you
won't be able to use them, and some of your s
> >zhengda wrote:
> >
> >>lsmod shows me many modules, and some of them aren't used.
> >>So how to prevent them being loaded?
> >>These modules aren't listed in /etc/modules
> Wackojacko wrote:
> >you can list these in /etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/ by creating a new file
> >e.g. local.
On 29.09.06 1
Wackojacko wrote:
zhengda wrote:
lsmod shows me many modules, and some of them aren't used.
So how to prevent them being loaded?
These modules aren't listed in /etc/modules
you can list these in /etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/ by creating a new file
e.g. local.
Wackojacko
Thank you. I still r
zhengda wrote:
lsmod shows me many modules, and some of them aren't used.
So how to prevent them being loaded?
These modules aren't listed in /etc/modules
you can list these in /etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/ by creating a new file
e.g. local.
Wackojacko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Wackojacko wrote:
Zheng Da wrote:
Does Debian load LKM automatically?
If it does, in which way? With the kernel module loader or with a
kerneld daemon?
I find that there is /etc/modules, but it list only a few modules.
lsmod shows me many more.
So I wonder how the other modules is loaded?
On 09/26/2006 09:30 PM, Zheng Da wrote:
Does Debian load LKM automatically?
If it does, in which way? With the kernel module loader or with a kerneld
daemon?
I find that there is /etc/modules, but it list only a few modules. lsmod
shows me many more.
So I wonder how the other modules is loaded?
Zheng Da wrote:
Does Debian load LKM automatically?
If it does, in which way? With the kernel module loader or with a
kerneld daemon?
I find that there is /etc/modules, but it list only a few modules. lsmod
shows me many more.
So I wonder how the other modules is loaded?
There are hardware d
13 matches
Mail list logo
