On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 14 dec 14, 15:49:57, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > After the lively debate here that "replacing" systemd after it's
> > installed is not the same as not installing it in the first place:
> > Here's the solution, more or less. Although, it seems, one
On Du, 14 dec 14, 15:49:57, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> After the lively debate here that "replacing" systemd after it's installed
> is not the same as not installing it in the first place: Here's the
> solution, more or less. Although, it seems, one will never be truly
> free from parts of systemd i
Hi.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:43:13PM +0100, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:49:57 -0800
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > After the lively debate here that "replacing" systemd after it's installed
> > is not the same as not installing it in the first place: Here's the
> > solut
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:49:57 -0800
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> After the lively debate here that "replacing" systemd after it's installed
> is not the same as not installing it in the first place: Here's the
> solution, more or less. Although, it seems, one will never be truly
> free from parts of
4 matches
Mail list logo