Quoting German (gentger...@gmail.com):
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:10 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:18:34 German wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:57:28 +0100
> > > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:15:20 German wrote:
> > > > > Well, Wanderer, I got
On Tue, 12 May 2015 12:25:47 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:38:18 German wrote:
> > Just rereading the thread, couldn't find any. What tools to use and
> > how to use them?
>
> You could start with the first two messages in the thread, other than
> yours. Counting yours, the
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:38:18 German wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:10 +0100
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:18:34 German wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:57:28 +0100
> > >
> > > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:15:20 German wrote:
> > > > > Well, W
On Tue, 12 May 2015 06:18:34 -0400
German wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:57:28 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:15:20 German wrote:
> > > Well, Wanderer, I got the drive cloned, it took three days, with
> > > no positive results.
> >
> > What results did you expect?
On Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:10 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:18:34 German wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:57:28 +0100
> >
> > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:15:20 German wrote:
> > > > Well, Wanderer, I got the drive cloned, it took three days,
> > > > wi
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:18:34 German wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:57:28 +0100
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:15:20 German wrote:
> > > Well, Wanderer, I got the drive cloned, it took three days, with no
> > > positive results.
> >
> > What results did you expect? You clo
On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:57:28 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:15:20 German wrote:
> > Well, Wanderer, I got the drive cloned, it took three days, with no
> > positive results.
>
> What results did you expect? You cloned it. You now presumablty
> have a clone. You can now wo
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:15:20 German wrote:
> Well, Wanderer, I got the drive cloned, it took three days, with no
> positive results.
What results did you expect? You cloned it. You now presumablty have a
clone. You can now work on the clone. What else?
USB is very slow. Might you be able
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:52:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 07:33 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
> > The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> That's what I got:
> >>>
> >>> spore@asterius:~$ lsblk
> >>> NAME MAJ
German wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > ddrescue if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/sdY /var/tmp/rescuelogfile
>
> Hmm.. The Wanderer suggest that *if= and of=* is the wrong syntax.
Argh! I have made two typos in the space of the last two messages. I
can't believe I made a mistake this silly.
> He says that
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:52:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 07:33 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
> > The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> That's what I got:
> >>>
> >>> spore@asterius:~$ lsblk
> >>> NAME MAJ
On Fri, 8 May 2015 17:15:51 -0400
German wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 22:05:40 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 08 May 2015 21:58:12 German wrote:
> > > It's happened when I was
> > > installing Lubuntu.
> >
> > Post hoc doesn't necessarily imply propter hoc.
> >
> > http://en.wikiped
On 5/8/2015 5:28 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:52:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
Not quite. /dev/sda2/ is not a directory; it's a device node. Since
/dev/sda2 is mounted to / (the root filesystem), the correct
equivalent to this command would be: ddrescue /dev/sdd /dev/sdc
/ddre
On 5/8/2015 10:20 AM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save .img
file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot of
failed drive and transfer it as a .
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:52:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 07:33 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
> > The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> That's what I got:
> >>>
> >>> spore@asterius:~$ lsblk
> >>> NAME MAJ
On 05/08/2015 at 07:33 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>>> That's what I got:
>>>
>>> spore@asterius:~$ lsblk
>>> NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
>>> sda 8:00 119.2G 0 disk
>>> ├─s
On Fri, 8 May 2015 17:22:11 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> German wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > I think I read that you have one identically sized drive, yes? I
> > > am not sure where you are sitting with regards to the other
> > > suggestions. But at the least I would make one good backup as
>
On Fri, 08 May 2015 19:20:37 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 8 May 2015 23:54:46 +0100 Lisi Reisz
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
> >>
> >> They are *your
Bob Proulx wrote:
> ddrescue if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/sdY /media/usb1
>
> Where /media/usb1 is an example of a mounted usb storage device.
> Replace that string with the mount point of the usb device mounted on
> your host system.
Obviously I made a mistake there. Not to the mount directory but to
German wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I think I read that you have one identically sized drive, yes? I am
> > not sure where you are sitting with regards to the other suggestions.
> > But at the least I would make one good backup as soon as possible.
> > And it seems that possibly you have the cap
On 05/08/2015 at 07:08 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 23:54:46 +0100 Lisi Reisz
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
>>
>>> Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
>>
>> They are *your* files. But given that you have actually got a
>> suitable disk, i would at
On Fri, 8 May 2015 23:54:46 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
> > Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
>
> They are *your* files. But given that you have actually got a
> suitable disk, i would at least dd them first onto that.
>
> Lisi
>
>
That's
On Friday 08 May 2015 23:07:34 German wrote:
> Can I try to run fsck on the failed drive?
They are *your* files. But given that you have actually got a suitable disk,
i would at least dd them first onto that.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:11:03 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 06:07 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
> >>> duplicate?
On 05/08/2015 at 06:07 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
>>> duplicate? After I duplicate the drive, what are my next steps?
>
>> With the drive
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
> > Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
> >>> The Wanderer wrote:
> >>>
> On 05/08/2015 at 02:
On Fri, 8 May 2015 22:05:40 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2015 21:58:12 German wrote:
> > It's happened when I was
> > installing Lubuntu.
>
> Post hoc doesn't necessarily imply propter hoc.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
>
> Lisi
>
>
You are philoso
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:00:13 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> German wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > There is an idea that I didn't see proposed as I read through this
> > > thread. If one had three same sized drives then there is another
> > > possibility.
> >
> > Problem I have now is the lack o
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:58:12 German wrote:
> It's happened when I was
> installing Lubuntu.
Post hoc doesn't necessarily imply propter hoc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:51:17 German wrote:
> Problem I have now is the lack of money. I simply don't have money now
> to buy yet another drive.
Well, you can use what you have got and risk it. Or you can wait a bit.
Assuming that the financial situation might ease.
But I would think carefully
German wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > There is an idea that I didn't see proposed as I read through this
> > thread. If one had three same sized drives then there is another
> > possibility.
>
> Problem I have now is the lack of money. I simply don't have money now
> to buy yet another drive. I
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:51:20 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 04:34 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:27:22 -0400 The Wanderer
> > wrote:
>
> >> What leads you to conclude that the drive is OK and the filesystem
> >> is what is bad? What errors are you seeing, in what
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:40:02 German wrote:
> Well, data is pretty much precious to me. Studios flacs of rare and
> hard to get music.
Then I would take at least one copy, preferably two, and work on a copy.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 05/08/2015 at 04:34 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:27:22 -0400 The Wanderer
> wrote:
>> What leads you to conclude that the drive is OK and the filesystem
>> is what is bad? What errors are you seeing, in what situations?
>
> Error mounting /dev/sdc1 at /media/spore/FreeAgent GoF
On Fri, 8 May 2015 14:41:24 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
> > Gary Dale wrote:
> > > I think Wanderer may be overstating the problem a little. If the
> > > two drives are exactly the same size, you can use ddrescue to
> > > duplicate the failed drive onto the new drive (ddrescue
>
The Wanderer wrote:
> Gary Dale wrote:
> > I think Wanderer may be overstating the problem a little. If the two
> > drives are exactly the same size, you can use ddrescue to duplicate
> > the failed drive onto the new drive (ddrescue if=/dev/sdb
> > of=/dev/sdc). However this will limit you to rec
On Fri, 8 May 2015 21:35:56 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2015 21:09:42 German wrote:
> > What will happen when I duplicate drive? Why is that failed drive is
> > failed and duplicated drive might be repairable? If it's
> > duplicated, it will be exactly the same, no?
>
> Yes, that
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:09:42 German wrote:
> What will happen when I duplicate drive? Why is that failed drive is
> failed and duplicated drive might be repairable? If it's duplicated, it
> will be exactly the same, no?
Yes, that is the point. If there is something wrong with the disk then eve
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:27:22 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 04:09 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
> >>> duplicate?
On 05/08/2015 at 04:09 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400 Gary Dale
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
>>> What will this duplication accomplish? What advantages if I am
>>> duplicate? After I duplicate the drive, what are my next steps?
>>
>> With the drive
On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:00:05 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
> > Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
> >>> The Wanderer wrote:
> >>>
> On 05/08/2015 at 02:
On 08/05/15 02:56 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
wrote:
On 05/08/2
On 05/08/2015 at 02:48 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400 The Wanderer
>> wrote:
>>> Yes, that's what I'd do in your situation. A 2.5TB drive should
>>> be more than enough; that would also let you store the
>>> sdb_failed.ddrescu
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:48:47 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
> > The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> On 05/0
On 08/05/15 02:32 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
wrote:
On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
Thanks, but some clarification is needed. Now I have two dri
On Fri, 08 May 2015 14:23:39 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
>
> >>> Thanks, but some clarification is needed. Now I have two drives,
> >>>
No.
With ddrescue, you do not (want to) create a new filesystem directly on
the new device.
What you want to do is create a filesystem _image_, in a file which is
stored on the new device.
Step-by-step, what you do is:
* Create a filesystem on your "good" drive (/dev/sdc). You can use any
fi
On 05/08/2015 at 02:16 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400 The Wanderer
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
>>> Thanks, but some clarification is needed. Now I have two drives,
>>> failed and a spare. Both are 2TB in size. Failed drive probably
>>> has 1.6
On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:01 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400 Gary Dale
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
> >>> Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save
> >>> .img file. Is
On 05/08/2015 at 01:20 PM, German wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400 Gary Dale
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
>>> Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save
>>> .img file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot
>>> of failed drive a
On Fri, 08 May 2015 12:10:38 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
> > Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save .img
> > file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot of
> > failed drive and transfer it as a .img file to a spare drive,
>
On 08/05/15 10:32 AM, German wrote:
Hi list. Ok, now I have a spare 2TB USB drive where I can save .img
file. Is that the right procedure? Do I have make a snapshot of failed
drive and transfer it as a .img file to a spare drive, correct?
R-studio for linux can display files of failed drive ( Tes
52 matches
Mail list logo