On Sunday, April 15, 2018 12:48:35 PM Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:05:12AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> > > Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> > > It was very straightforward
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:05:12AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> > Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> > It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> > configuration - two W
On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> configuration - two WiFi APs with the same SSID ('AP name' in layman
> terms), each brigded to the same wired
Reco wrote:
> Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> configuration - two WiFi APs with the same SSID ('AP name' in layman
> terms), each brigded to the same wired VLAN. Worked better than I was
> anticip
David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Well, nice that they're starting to do that ... it's still a Linksys, so
>> (not having any experience with it either), I'd lean toward it not being
>> that great of a device.
>
> That's a shame. I was moving toward
Hi.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:17:06AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> > > Dan Purgert wrote:
> > >> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the s
On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the same
> >> channel as the upstream AP. It *cannot* use a different channel.
> >>
> >>
Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the same
>> channel as the upstream AP. It *cannot* use a different channel.
>>
>> In the event you have a dual-band AP, and the following conditions are
>
Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:00:31 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Celejar wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
>> > Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>> >>
>> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other client
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> David Wright wrote:
> >> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it mea
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:00:31 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
> >>
> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
> >> or is it
David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> David Wright wrote:
>> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
>> >> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you
On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >>
> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
> >> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting
>
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>>
>> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
>> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting
>> its time between pretending to be an AP for a client device, and
>>
On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> Celejar wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> >> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>
> >> >> Yep, you've got the terms righ
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Celejar wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
>> > Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>> >>
>> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other client
On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
> >>
> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
> >> or is it J
Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>>
>> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
>> or is it JUST trying to pretend that it's a client device to the
>> TP-Link?
>
> I'm no
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >
> >> Joe wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> >> > with multiple Ethernet ports are swi
Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Joe wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
>> > with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
>> > Indeed, many routers can be configur
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Joe wrote:
> > [...]
> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> > with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
> > Indeed, many routers can be configured as VLANs.
>
> Hubs pr
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 13:09:00 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> David Wright wrote:
>> >
>> > --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> > Content-Disposition: inline
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> >
>> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), D
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 12:49:16 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > The software might not support it, but if openwrt or ddwrt can run
> > > on the hardware, they should support bridging.
> >
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The software might not support it, but if openwrt or ddwrt can run
> > on the hardware, they should support bridging.
>
> I can make sure the router I buy can run openwrt or ddwrt, but it
>
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > 1: I suppose there might be some network hardware which doesn't
> > > support actual bridging of wired interfaces, but I've
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > 1: I suppose there might be some network hardware which doesn't
> > support actual bridging of wired interfaces, but I've yet to see
> > such an example.
>
> I think the router I've been usi
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 08:48:50 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 13:09:00 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> >
> > --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> >> On We
On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 23:26:38 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that a
Joe wrote:
> [...]
> I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
> Indeed, many routers can be configured as VLANs.
Hubs pretty much are. Not entirely sure where you're thinking switches
are "softwa
David Wright wrote:
>
> --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
>> > When you reprogram routers with dd-w
On Friday, March 16, 2018 08:53:00 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I haven't had the need to do that, and I'm not quite sure how I would go
> about it, but (thinking on the fly now), I might try putting a switch
> immediately after the modem, with two routers plugged into that, then a
> router and o
On Friday, March 16, 2018 04:48:50 AM Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> > I haven't paid attention to this thread from the beginning, but
> > looking at the sketch, I'm wondering what the purpose of the 2nd
> > router is? Why not instead of a route
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that a
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> > > wired bridging even though the manufacturer's fo
On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> > wired bridging even though the manufacturer's formware doesn't allow
> > for that?
>
> openwrt and dd-wrt both allo
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> wired bridging even though the manufacturer's formware doesn't allow
> for that?
openwrt and dd-wrt both allow wired bridging[1] (or pseudo-bridging by
routing if your wireless hardw
On Wednesday 14 March 2018 22:24:26 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 09 Mar 2018 at 12:31:35 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > > > For many years I have used my desktp
On Fri 09 Mar 2018 at 12:31:35 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > > For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server
> > > with two interfaces one facin
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:22:36 +0200
Johann Spies wrote:
> Thanks again for all the inputs.
>
> I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
>
> Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
> understand why I could not
> get it working with Shorewall which I have use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:06:12AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> I see I have broken the thread by adding [SOLVED] to the subject.
But only because gmail is a broken mail user agent: it seems to have
dropped the In-Reply-To header. The change of subjec
I see I have broken the thread by adding [SOLVED] to the subject.
Just to keep it in this thread:
I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
understand why I could not
get it working with Shorewall which I have used fo
Thanks again for all the inputs.
I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
understand why I could not
get it working with Shorewall which I have used for many years.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loya
On 3/9/2018 3:30 PM, Johann Spies wrote:
For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
local network.
Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
available in parallel.
I
On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server
> > with two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the
> > other the local network.
> >
>
Johann Spies wrote:
> For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
> two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
> local network.
>
> Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
> available in parallel.
>
> I have deci
Hi.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
> two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
> local network.
>
> Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both conn
47 matches
Mail list logo
