r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help! partition table!
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:34:37 +0200
Whoops...
That's a bad one. Really evil. So you wrote a new filesystem over
your last one?
A partition itself can be found again when it disappears from the
disklabel,
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 02:57:05PM +, Hugo Ideler wrote:
> Well, I'd love to give it a try, as I have nothing to lose.
> But, how do I get to your 'fsck' utility? I rebooted to my Woody CD1 just a
> few secs ago, went to shell, but got 'fsck: no such command'.
Use /sbin/fsck if /sbin isn't in
Golani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help! partition table!
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:19:03 +0530
Hello,
Again this may be way too trivial, but I recently did a mkswap on my root
partition instead of the space set aside for swap. I no
Hello,
Again this may be way too trivial, but I recently did a mkswap on my root
partition instead of the space set aside for swap. I noticed the prob just as
you and switched off the machine and restarted with similar results as you.
To recover I rebooted from my Debian CD and did a fsck /dev
On Friday 07 March 2003 02:34 pm, Hugo Ideler wrote:
> It's ext3, but I must add that the formating of wasn't very far when I
> hit the power-off. But I suppose this won't make much of a difference?
>
> But isn't it possible to recover files in the style that it is possible
> to recover files delet
This mail is solely to keep anyone up to date that was following this
thread.
I tried to no success recover my data. I tried demos of expensive recovery
software - and some could find superblocks, but not recover my files. It
seems the message is quite clear - no FAT - no recovery. I've managed
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 23:34:43 +
"Hugo Ideler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's ext3, but I must add that the formating of wasn't very far when I
> hit the power-off. But I suppose this won't make much of a difference?
This probably won't work, but you could boot with a rescue CD (Knoppix
is k
rectory. :)
--Azaghal
From: Johan Ehnberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hugo Ideler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help! partition table!
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:34:37 +0200
Whoops...
That's a bad one. Really evil. So you wrote a new filesystem over your last
Whoops...
That's a bad one. Really evil. So you wrote a new filesystem over your
last one?
A partition itself can be found again when it disappears from the
disklabel, but this is different.
AFAIK, the data (or probably 99% of it) is still there, on your
partition, but there's no filesystem to t
Jason Gunthorpe writes:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Arup Mukherjee wrote:
>
> >I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> > some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> > disks, as linux sees them, are screwed up. However, if you boot dos or
> > wind
"Arup Mukherjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm under the impression (from the debian fdisk man page, among other
> things) that DOS/W95 store a copy of the partition table in their boot
> sectors, and use its info in preference to that from the MBR. Assuming
> that's true, I'd just like to
Hello!
Arup Mukherjee writes:
>
>
> Ralph Winslow writes:
> > Arup Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> > > some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> > > disks, as linux sees them, are screw
Ralph Winslow writes:
> Arup Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> > some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> > disks, as linux sees them, are screwed up. However, if you boot dos or
> > windows 95
On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Arup Mukherjee wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm having a problem that appears to be the inverse of what
> some people here have had before. The partition tables on BOTH my
> disks, as linux sees them, are screwed up. However, if you boot dos or
> windows 95 from the hard disks (vi
14 matches
Mail list logo
