Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 09:03:57PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
> > It seems like it will be better and surely safer than Outlook,
>
> Why better and, most particularly, why safer? Given that GNOME is
> built to allow components to interact with one
> > >Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> > download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get
> utility
> > will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for the
> update?
> > Has anyone else tried this?
No, this won't work. You can
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 09:03:57PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> It seems like it will be better and surely safer than Outlook,
Why better and, most particularly, why safer? Given that GNOME is
built to allow components to interact with one another via scripting,
there is no reason to suppose tha
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12:03 PM 7/28/00 -0400, Ethan Pierce wrote:
> >Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get utility
> will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for th
> ** On Jul 29, Ethan Pierce scribbled:
> > The main reason I am psyched for evolution is my girlfriend cant grasp pine
> > or mail. She needs something graphical. If I can avoid booting windows2000
> > so she can read her email in outlook I will be happy as a clam...hence
> > evolution is the pe
** On Jul 29, Ethan Pierce scribbled:
> The main reason I am psyched for evolution is my girlfriend cant grasp pine
> or mail. She needs something graphical. If I can avoid booting windows2000
> so she can read her email in outlook I will be happy as a clam...hence
> evolution is the perfect solu
Message -
From: "Marek Habersack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: Helix Gnome Evolution 0.3
** On Jul 29, Andre Berger scribbled:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
>
> > it as on a marketing/support factor. If any of your customers would come to
> > you and say "hm... I would switch to Linux, but I kinda like the M$ Outlook.
> > If Linux had something like that...". Now you w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> it as on a marketing/support factor. If any of your customers would come to
> you and say "hm... I would switch to Linux, but I kinda like the M$ Outlook.
> If Linux had something like that...". Now you will be able to say "Voila!
> Evolution - right h
** On Jul 29, Hans scribbled:
> At 12:03 PM 7/28/00 -0400, Ethan Pierce wrote:
> >Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get utility
> will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for the up
At 12:03 PM 7/28/00 -0400, Ethan Pierce wrote:
>Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get utility
will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for the update?
Has anyone else tried this?
>
>T
** On Jul 28, Kent West scribbled:
> Ethan Pierce wrote:
> >
> > Sorry all, the sources.list line should read:
> >
> > deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian/ ./
> >
>
> I thought the . in "./" was a typo, so I didn't include it. I got a
> bunch of dependency error
Ethan Pierce wrote:
>
> Sorry all, the sources.list line should read:
>
> deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian/ ./
>
I thought the . in "./" was a typo, so I didn't include it. I got a
bunch of dependency errors. So I went back and added the . and tried
again; st
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get
> utility will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for
> the update? Has anyone
Sorry all, the sources.list line should read:
deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian/ ./
>>> Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/28/00 12:15PM >>>
Ethan Pierce wrote:
>
> Sorry, I found the answer to my question. Evolution .3 is a Microsoft
> Outlook replacement fo
Ethan Pierce wrote:
>
> Sorry, I found the answer to my question. Evolution .3 is a Microsoft
> Outlook replacement for linux. To get it via apt-get add the following to
> sources.list
>
> deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian
>
> run - apt-get update
> -
Sorry, I found the answer to my question. Evolution .3 is a Microsoft Outlook
replacement for linux. To get it via apt-get add the following to sources.list
deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian
run - apt-get update
- apt-get install evolution
Enjoy - thi
17 matches
Mail list logo