Yes it can be done. You'll need to get the version of apt-get that is in
ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/upgrade-2.0-i386/ and then edit
your /etc/apt/sources.list to point to the potato packages. Run apt-get
update followed by apt-get dist-upgrade. It's been quite a while since I
did this
Robert Rati wrote:
> Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones
> I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks.
>
> Rob
>
> ===
> [EMA
*- On 22 Jun, Robert Rati wrote about "hamm dist sites"
> Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones
> I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks.
>
Scroll down to the bottom of http://www.debian.org and you will find:
Old versions of Debian
Debian 1.3 (codenam
Robert Rati wrote:
> Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones
> I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks.
>
> Rob
>
>
http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/
ftp://debian.midco.net/debian
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 04:44:37PM -0400, Matthew McFarlane wrote:
> I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best
> way to upgrade (apt?) and how?
apt-get dist-upgrade
There is an upgrade guide somewhere in the top level directory
structure.
Bob
--
Bob Nielsen
yOn Sat, 29 May 1999, Matthew McFarlane wrote:
> I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best
> way to upgrade (apt?) and how?
The instructions are in the file main/Release-Notes.
I think I added apt as a method in dselect, and then let dselect to its
thing.
...RickM..
Mark Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MT> I'm trying to upgrade a debian 2.0 (hamm) system to 2.1 (slink).
MT> I've got 2.1 on a mounted CD-ROM and apt installed correctly on
MT> the system. The problem I am having is getting "apt-get
MT> dist-upgrade" to work. When I run the command (as root)
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:23:56 GMT, you wrote:
>I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
>this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
/etc/apt/apt.conf:
Acquire::cdrom::Mount "/mnt/cdrom";
fixes this.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 11:12:06AM -0500, Sean wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
>
> > I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
> > this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
> >
>
> Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is
> m
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:12:06 -0500, you wrote:
>Marc Haber wrote:
>> I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
>> this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
>>
>
>Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is
>mounted
>on /cdrom
Marc Haber wrote:
> I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
> this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
>
Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is
mounted
on /cdrom -- change the "/mnt/cdrom" to "/cdrom", then type:
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:48:33 -0700 (MST), you wrote:
>then run 'apt-get dist-upgrade -u' twice (or is it 3 times?)
I had to run apt-get dis-upgrade -u numerous times (at least twenty
times) with varying cd changes to upgrade my hamm test system to
slink. Occasionally, even --fix-missing (?, don't
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:48:33 -0700 (MST), you wrote:
>The final solution is to install APT 0.3 from potato and use it's built in
>CD handling through apt-cdrom.
Good work. I like it.
>I have made a special source specifically
>for this,
>
>deb http://www.debian.org/~jgg apt/
>
>Which will contain
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There have been several posts on debian-user asking how to use apt-get
> to upgrade from hamm to slink, now that the binaries no longer fit on
> a single CD.
> I've seen two answers so far on the list---both of them containing
> very helpful suggest
Subject: Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely
Date: Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:21:36PM +0100
In reply to:Helge Hafting
Quoting Helge Hafting([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> you wrote:
> > Graham Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
>
you wrote:
> Graham Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the
> > > same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my
> > > mail box straight away.
> >
> >
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 06:00 -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> I have recently upgraded to slink and now the following apps only display in
> monochrome:
>
> lynx 2.8.1rel.2
> mutt 0.95.3i
> slrn 0.9.5.3
>
> I don't get any error mesages and the config files are set to use color.
> (minicom is
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Graham Ashton wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the
> > same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my
> > mail box straight away.
>
> I've got the same problem. Stra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I suppose it would be possible to change this behaviour, but I haven't
> found how;
Add this to the "MAIN CONFIGURATION SETTINGS" section of your exim.conf
file:
# Have exim deliver all mail that's received in a single connection.
# Normally it will deliver the first
Graham Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the
> > same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my
> > mail box straight away.
>
> I've got the same problem. Str
*- On 2 Mar, Mark Phillips wrote about "Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim
behaves strangely"
>
> I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the
> same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my
> mail box straight away. The rest of the messages sit arou
On 1 March 1999 at 15:15, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have instal
>led
>> apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sources.list file to point to
>> ftp://ftp.us.debia.org/frozen main contrib non-free. I then di
On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote:
> I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the
> same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my
> mail box straight away.
I've got the same problem. Strange, isn't it.
--
Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have
> installed
> apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sources.list file to point to
> ftp://ftp.us.debia.org/frozen main contrib non-free. I then did an
> apt-get update followed by an apt-get dis
It may be a bug, but I am not sure. You can fix it by using the http port.
That is, change your sources.list to
http://ftp.us.debian.org...
hope it helps...
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _
Subject: Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS
Date: Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 08:55:20PM -0500
In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have
> installed
> apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/a
On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 08:55:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have
> installed
> apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sources.list file to point to
> ftp://ftp.us.debia.org/frozen main contrib non-free. I then did an
> ap
Larry Fletcher writes:
> I thought pressing on all of my previous defaults except for the
> change from PAP to CHAT might be causing pppconfig to think that nothing
> was changed, so I was trying to get rid of my defaults and start over.
No, pressing enter like that is just like re-entering every
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Larry writes:
>> Can anyone tell what went wrong and how to fix it?
>
>In /etc/ppp/pap-secrets you will find a line like:
>
> ay903 * ""
The line turned out to be:
molec3 * password
>Change it to:
>
> ay903" * qwertyuip
>
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Larry writes:
>> The first time I tried pppconfig it worked perfectly, but I just tried
>> to change the phone number and now it won't connect.
>
>*Exactly* what did you do? *Exactly* what results did you get?
1) My provider changed its phone number, so I
Larry writes:
> Can anyone tell what went wrong and how to fix it?
The first one is a normal 'chat' login.
You expect
turn>:
The server sends
'Type "lafn" and :'
and you repond with
ay903^M
it then sends
'Password:'
and you send
(your password, I assum
Larry Fletcher wrote:
>
> >Larry Fletcher wrote:
> >> The first time I tried pppconfig it worked perfectly, but I just tried
> >> to change the phone number and now it won't connect. (The only change
> >> is the phone number, everything else is the same.)
> >>
> >> I tried deleting /etc/ppp/peers/
>Larry Fletcher wrote:
>> The first time I tried pppconfig it worked perfectly, but I just tried
>> to change the phone number and now it won't connect. (The only change
>> is the phone number, everything else is the same.)
>>
>> I tried deleting /etc/ppp/peers/provider in an effort to erase the
>>
Larry writes:
> The first time I tried pppconfig it worked perfectly, but I just tried
> to change the phone number and now it won't connect.
*Exactly* what did you do? *Exactly* what results did you get?
> I tried deleting /etc/ppp/peers/provider in an effort to erase the
> defaults and start o
Also check out the files in /etc/chatscripts/... these are used as well, i just
manually changed the phone no here recently.
cheers
Larry Fletcher wrote:
> The first time I tried pppconfig it worked perfectly, but I just tried
> to change the phone number and now it won't connect. (The only chan
Peter Berlau wrote:
>
> Yes, if You use the apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade method
> apt-get will continue where it is "broken", no prloblems here (afaik) :-)
That seems to be the case here. I decided to try it out. I shut down ppp
and ctrl-c'd apt. I then restarted ppp and restarted apt-ge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You can upgrade small chunks at a time by using deselect to put sections
> on hold. First start by putting everything on hold by putting the
> cursor over the
>
> --- Updated packages (newer version is available) ---
>
> line and hit the equal key(=). Then select th
*- On 18 Feb, Mark Wagnon wrote about "hamm to slink upgrade via atp question"
> Hi all,
>
> I've decided to try to upgrade to slink. My question is that according
> to apt. it's going to take 8+ hours to ftp all the files. I can't have
> my phone tied up that long. How can I download the files du
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 09:00:48PM -0800, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> Hi all,
[..]
> my phone tied up that long. How can I download the files during shorter
> times? If I close the connection, will apt just start where it left off?
Yes, if You use the apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade method
apt-get w
I want to upgrade my libc from 2.0.7t-1 to libc6_2.0.7v-1.deb too.
Can I simply install the appropriate packages, even if during the process
parts of the system will be broken ? Is there a possibility that my system
will completely be useless so that I will have to reinstall hamm from scratch ?
[I probably should have included much of this in my post last night, but
I seemed to be dying of flu at the time...]
On Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 09:36:38PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe spewed forth:
>
> On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Jason Wright wrote:
>
> > gusgus:~ # dpkg -s libc6
> > Version: 2.0.7-19981211-1
Yes! libc6 requires libc6-dev of the same level. I have had this problem
in the past.
just run your apt-get -f install and it will pull whatever files are required
to solve the problem. (which means upgrading libc6-dev)
Your good to go man. :)
Ivan
Quoting Jason Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark Wagnon wrote:
>
> Where might I find the current version of libc6? I've searched in slink,
> frozen, potato, unstable, etc. and the only version of libc6 i can find
> is 2.0.7-19981211-1. I too need to get this file, but I can't find it.
> I've searche the packages from the http-based package
Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> If memory serves. 2.0.7u is > 2.0.7-19981211-1. IE, upgrade your libc
> package to the current version because, well, apt depends on it. :)
>
Where might I find the current version of libc6? I've searched in slink,
frozen, potato, unstable, etc. and the only version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:33:49 -0800, Jason Wright wrote:
>I manually installed apt, libc6, libstdc++2.9 and such from slink and
>then resolved as many of the conflicts and such by hand as I could.
>However, I'm not sure what to do about this one:
>Sor
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Jason Wright wrote:
> gusgus:~ # dpkg -s libc6
> Version: 2.0.7-19981211-1
Ooops, this is the evil libc6 :> Use aptv3 from
http://www.debian.org/~jgg or use the slink libc6.
Jason
Ruud de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a) It seems that the initailisation of the COM ports is changed. I saw a
> message during boot that something was wrong.
Install the new version of "setserial" from slink or potato.
> b) I could not find a way to access my ZIP drive (parallel). It seem
I have basicly the same question but differnt problems. Everthing works
on my server except ip aliasing. Ie Only one of my web sites show up.
Do I need a new ifconfig or such? Would it be easier to just upgrade to
slink?
---
Mike Deal - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.zonenet.net / www.northwestext
Check this link out:
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/
See section 6.3
Kent
Darko Martic wrote:
> Hi
>
> What are those (in subject) ?
>
> Thanx !
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 08:15:19 +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> After upgrading from bo to hamm, xmaple did not work any more (the command
> line tool maple did work). The error message was "Segmentation fault" :-(
>
> Further I noticed, that netscape 4.07 did not work either (the same error
> mess
On Fri, Oct 23, 1998 at 09:34:53AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> You should be able to get apt from slink, use the apt method from dselect
> and set it up with several sources:
>
> file://path1
> file://path2
> file://path3
Last I tried, it didn't like that. It complained about the other CD's
wh
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 1998 at 05:34:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Which is the way to access several CD's from dselect at the same time?
>
> I believe that there is no such way, unless you have several CD-ROM
> drives so that you can mount
On Fri, Oct 23, 1998 at 05:34:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which is the way to access several CD's from dselect at the same time?
I believe that there is no such way, unless you have several CD-ROM
drives so that you can mount all of them simultaneously. Sorry.
There has been talk in t
I have a Hamm box on a 4.3 and a Slink box on a 4.3, both IDE. No hassles.
Have not run a box greater than the 4.3 however. Anyone in the 6-9 range on
IDE care to comment.
I've got an 8.4GB IDE in my machine that runs like a clock (without the
tick-tock :-).
JDM
On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Michael Stone wrote:
> Has anyone had problems using large hard ide hard drives with hamm? I
> was getting errors (EXT2-fs warning: ext2_free_(blocks|inode): bit
> already cleared) on a
Rick Pasotto writes:
> When I put my static local ip address in pppconfig ppp wouldn't start.
> The modem connected, login and password were ok but then after several
> ConfReq/ConfAck messages it gave up.
Please try this again and send me copies of /etc/ppp/peers/provider and the
resulting log.
At 04:09 PM 9/15/1998 -0600, you wrote:
>I relativley new to Debian. I did my first Debian install a week ago, After
>4 years of slackware, and a brief stint with RedHat
>
>
>(I asked three email support questions like, why doesn't g++ wok with full
>error messages etc. All answers "this is not an
On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Andreas Kahari wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> After running autoup.sh on my 1.3.1 system, do I need to update *all* my
> packages at once, or may I choose to wait with some of the packages and
> update them when I have time?
>
> Is my system "unstable" if I run autoup.sh without doing a
On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Dan Hrabarchuk wrote:
> I relativley new to Debian. I did my first Debian install a week ago, After
> 4 years of slackware, and a brief stint with RedHat
Welcome!
>
>
> (I asked three email support questions like, why doesn't g++ wok with full
> error messages etc. All ans
Mark,
I haven't done a 1.2MB install so please bear with me :) I think that
you need the 6 1.2 images plus the 1.2 rescue image and lowmemrd (which
I think is ram disk) and rawrite.exe if you're writing the floppies from
DOS. I think (though the install guide is pretty vague about the 1.2M
On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, Martin Wheeler wrote:
:
: Is it just me, or has anyone else got problems with an eighteen-and-a-half
: Mb lastlog file appearing on a hamm system within minutes of completing
: installation? [see: /var/log/lastlog
wiz:~ $ ls -lAF /va
On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
:
: Hey all. I just realized that the wu-ftp package was not upgraded when I
: moved from bo to hamm. I have not been able to find a hamm version of
: this package. It's relatively important that I do, as t
Boot with your rescue disk. Mount the partition that contains your
/etc directory. Edit /etc/X11/config, commenting out the line
"start-xdm". Reboot normally.
Mike
On Thu, Jul 30, 1998 at 04:44:39PM -0700, James Brown Ender/Gcc" wrote:
> Hi,
>I've just upgraded my system to Hamm, but
Martin Schulze hat gesagt: // Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bernhard Treutwein writes:
> > Sorry, if that is an FAQ, but I did not find any hint.
> >
> > What changed between the final and the beta-2, or where
> > can I find that info ?
>
> Whoops. I believe the easiest ways to find out are:
>
> a)
Bernhard Treutwein writes:
> Sorry, if that is an FAQ, but I did not find any hint.
>
> What changed between the final and the beta-2, or where
> can I find that info ?
Whoops. I believe the easiest ways to find out are:
a) let mirror run over a mirror of beta-2
b) Check the archives of debian
James Brown (Ender/Gcc) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I've just upgraded my system to Hamm, but after a reboot the screen
> flashs from text to graphics
> mode, and back. I think it might be XDM, as X Windows doesnt load...
>
> Any suggestions on how I can stop this? I dont want to format my H/D,
> and I c
I found what my problem was, when installing the module, I choose
options=3 (for 10bt-NBC), while I had to choose 0 for 10bt.
I need some sleep :).
Thanks for your (and all the others') help,
Liran.
---
http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~liranz/
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > You ne
My experience was that:
3Com is now selling the 3c905B card. Notice the "B". Drivers
for this appeared in the 2.0.34 kernel.
The boot-floppies I used had 2.0.33.
- Marsh
-Original Message-
From: Liran Zvibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-testing@lists.debian.org ; Debian
Mailing L
Another thing to watch out for is the AutoSelect of the interface.
You might be better off selecting 10mbit for the installation
then tweaking it later on. The 3Com's especially have troubles
negotiating with Bay Networks switches.
Liran Zvibel sez:
>On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
>
>> >
>>
>
> >
> > You need to mount whatever directory (read: file system) you were mounting
> > on the RedHat system. If you are mounting it as root (which - I think - is
> > the only way you /can/ mount a fs), then it doesn't matter where you mount
> > it on your local system. The preferred place is /
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
> >
> > BTW: When I get it to work (And it will work today, whether the machine
> > wants to or not), what is the directory to mount? (/dists,
> > /dists/hamm, /dists/hamm/hamm, /dists/hamm/hamm/binary-i386 , any other
> > locatoin?) - just to save my time...
> >
> >
> > I forgot to mension it before, but the reply I get is:
> > mount: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Timed Out
> >
> > Can you help?
> > Liran.
> > ---
> > http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~liranz/
> >
>
> It sounds as if the problem is not with your modem, but with the nfs server.
>
> BTW: When I get it to work (And it will work today, whether the machine
> wants to or not), what is the directory to mount? (/dists,
> /dists/hamm, /dists/hamm/hamm, /dists/hamm/hamm/binary-i386 , any other
> locatoin?) - just to save my time...
>
You need to mount whatever directory (read: f
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> : I forgot to mension it before, but the reply I get is:
> : mount: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Timed Out
>
> Aha - so the NIC works, but trying to mount an NFS share on that machine
> does not.
>
> Is the NFS server running Debian? Some BSD NF
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to mension it before, but the reply I get is:
> > mount: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Timed Out
>
> It sounds as if the problem is not with your modem, but with the nfs server.
> I've had that error when the file system I have been trying to
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
: On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
:
: > On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
: >
: > > On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
: > > > What you need to select is the 3c59x driver. It works equally well for
: > > > 3c59x and 3c905 NICs.
: > > I tr
>
> I forgot to mension it before, but the reply I get is:
> mount: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Timed Out
>
> Can you help?
> Liran.
> ---
> http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~liranz/
>
It sounds as if the problem is not with your modem, but with the nfs server.
I've had that error when the file s
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
> > > What you need to select is the 3c59x driver. It works equally well for
> > > 3c59x and 3c905 NICs.
> > I tried doing that, and it didn't work.
> > I'll try again, a
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
> > What you need to select is the 3c59x driver. It works equally well for
> > 3c59x and 3c905 NICs.
> I tried doing that, and it didn't work.
> I'll try again, and maybe I'll have more luck (and check that there is no
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Taren wrote:
> What you need to select is the 3c59x driver. It works equally well for
> 3c59x and 3c905 NICs.
I tried doing that, and it didn't work.
I'll try again, and maybe I'll have more luck (and check that there is no
problem with the NFS server...)
>
> I've been using
>
> The problem is that the installation floppies (the drv1440, I mean)
> doesn't have 3com 90x PCI drivers, and I can't work. (I'm writing this
> from my other computer that has RedHat (that will hopefully become
> Debian as soon as I can get it to work with the network card)).
>
What you need t
I saw a message in another thread that stated the X keyboard extension
had to be enabled for backspace to work properly. That was my problem;
now I've gotten rid of the xmodmap statement to fix backspace.
On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 09:48:39AM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> I found the info on the bug t
Most mirrors are still not caught up. I expect this to occure in two days
time (for all mirrors)
The only two mirrors that are up-to-date are
http://ftp1.us.debian.org/debian
http://open.hands.com/debian
And va's private mirror. All 3 are the only push mirrors an were uptodate
about an hour aft
> I'm confused. I thought Debian 2.0 (hamm) was officially released last
> night. Does that not make it the "stable" version? Near as I can tell, the
> ftp.debian.org site still has 1.3 in it's stable directory. Should I be
> pulling from the stable dir or still from the frozen dir? Thanks.
I woul
> I'm confused. I thought Debian 2.0 (hamm) was officially released last
> night. Does that not make it the "stable" version? Near as I can tell, the
> ftp.debian.org site still has 1.3 in it's stable directory. Should I be
> pulling from the stable dir or still from the frozen dir? Thanks.
I thi
On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 05:15:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 09:13:50AM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> > For future reference, how would I access the non-maintainer upload? I see
> > 0.93i-1 on the non-us ftp sites, and I can't find an Incoming
> > directory/mirror tha
On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 09:13:50AM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> For future reference, how would I access the non-maintainer upload? I see
> 0.93i-1 on the non-us ftp sites, and I can't find an Incoming
> directory/mirror that has 0.93i-1.1.
ftp://non-US.debian.org/debian-non-US/Incoming .
HTH,
Ra
On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 09:13:50AM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 08:31:06AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 1998 at 05:25:23PM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> > [mutt-i_0.93i-1 key problem]
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 07:57:37AM +0200, Martin Schulze ans
I found the info on the bug tracking system that the home/end key problem was
fixed in the latest release.
The xrdb problem was a user error -- have to start a new xterm to test the new
resources. I had gotten used to xmodmap working immediately in xterms that
were already open.
I modified /etc/X
On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 08:31:06AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 1998 at 05:25:23PM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> [mutt-i_0.93i-1 key problem]
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 07:57:37AM +0200, Martin Schulze answered:
> > This has been reported as a bug yesterday. Seems somehow a k
On Wed, Jul 15, 1998 at 05:25:23PM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
[mutt-i_0.93i-1 key problem]
On Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 07:57:37AM +0200, Martin Schulze answered:
> This has been reported as a bug yesterday. Seems somehow a keybinding
> got lost.
Actually it turned out to be a change in the Muttrc sy
Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> When I type "m" to mail, the "d" key does not work properly when entering the
> subject: or to: fields. I have to enter "dd" to get a single "d" to show up. I
This has been reported as a bug yesterday. Seems somehow a keybinding
got lost. Could you check the bug tracking s
>> "TAwtM" == The Armadillo with the Mask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As a second note: there is libc6 r5 available (maybe in
Incoming). Don't use the r3.
For more info check the discussion on debian-devel through the
mailinglist archives.
Ciao,
Martin
--
from a 1996 Microshit ad cam
>> "TAwtM" == The Armadillo with the Mask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TAwtM> "errors while processing libc6-dev_2.0.7r-3.deb:
TAwtM> could not overwrite /usr/include/asm which is also included in package
TAwtM> libc-kheaders
TAwtM> dpkg-deb subprocess paste killed by signal (broken pipe)"
dpkg
On 12-Jul-1998, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It IS very reasonable, unfortunately I just ordered a couple from
> Cheapbytes in the USA. Not only will they take 2 weeks to get here,
> it's going to cost me about $12 in the end too.
>
> I have a burner here but couldn't work out ho
On Sun, Jul 12, 1998 at 12:21:39AM +1000, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> On 30-Jun-1998, Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > > Part of the problem is that we pay for bandwidth used in Australia --
> > > $230/Gb on most of the backbones. It's just a bit cheaper to get
> > > a CD from
On 30-Jun-1998, Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> > Part of the problem is that we pay for bandwidth used in Australia --
> > $230/Gb on most of the backbones. It's just a bit cheaper to get
> > a CD from the USA.
>
> If any of the (hopefully many) Australian debain users on
Hi Phil:
Someone correct me if I'w wrong.
I believe you have to run dselect to install
the rest of the packages that autoup.sh removed
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Phil Dyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 29, 1998 7:48 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: hamm upgrade/c
ISSUE_FILE_ENAB no
has been changed to
#ISSUE_FILE /etc/issue
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lindsay Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perth, Western Australia
voice +61 8 9316 248632.0125S 115.8445Evk6lj Debian Linux
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Tue, Jun 30, 1998 at 08:15:57AM +, Damon Muller wrote:
> > Part of the problem is that we pay for bandwidth used in Australia --
> > $230/Gb on most of the backbones. It's just a bit cheaper to get
> > a CD from the USA.
>
> If any of the (hopefully many) Australian debain users on the list
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
