Re: HELP: Fatal Signal 11

1997-04-25 Thread John Maheu
This morning on my computer I found: Stack segment: CPU:0 EIP:0010[<3451>] EFLAGS:00010246 eax:2000 ebx: ecx: edx:00012000 esi:0001 edi:01606e08 ebp:0003 esp:01606db0 ds:0018 es:0018 fs:0026 gs:0026 ss:0018 Process Savelog(pid:2842, prcess nr: 24,stackpage=0160

Re: HELP: Fatal Signal 11

1997-04-24 Thread Boris D. Beletsky
Few month a go I had the same problem (sigsegv in gcc), solved it by changing the motherboard. I suspect it was the cache but I can't say for sure. Hope that helps, borik --- Boris D. Beletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Syst

Re: HELP: Fatal Signal 11

1997-04-24 Thread John Maheu
On Thu, 24 Apr 1997, Felix Almeida wrote: > On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, John Maheu wrote: > > > Hi all: I'm fairly new to linux. Lately I've been getting a lot of fatal > > signal 11's. > > > gcc: Internal compiler error: program f771 got fatal signal 11 > > This error means a problem with your me

Re: HELP: Fatal Signal 11

1997-04-24 Thread Felix Almeida
On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, John Maheu wrote: > Hi all: I'm fairly new to linux. Lately I've been getting a lot of fatal > signal 11's. > gcc: Internal compiler error: program f771 got fatal signal 11 This error means a problem with your memory or with your cache (try to look the GCC FAQ). You can

Re: HELP: Fatal Signal 11

1997-04-24 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "John" == John Maheu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Hi all: I'm fairly new to linux. Lately I've been getting a John> lot of fatal signal 11's. John> It seems to occur when my system has been up for a few days John> under light load or up a day under a heavier load, runni

Re: HELP: Fatal Signal 11

1997-04-23 Thread Al Youngwerth
There's something in the kernel 2.0 readme about this problem. It is related to hardware problems. For me, it turned out to be a problem with the external cache in my motherboard. Al Youngwerth [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- > From: John Maheu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org