Re: google-chrome printer/copier error

On 02/02/2025 10:39, John Conover wrote: [2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \ Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \ object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \ Did not receive a reply. Does anyone k

Re: google-chrome printer/copier error

On Sat 01 Feb 2025 at 19:39:55 (-0800), John Conover wrote: > > [2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \ > Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \ > object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \ > Did not receiv

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

Corentin Bardet writes: > I think you have no other option than using Google Chrome for your > meetings. Screen sharing works in Firefox ESR on Wayland. So I still have options. Just that few features - like blur background etc. doesn't work in FF.

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

On Sun, 2022-09-11 at 10:26 +0200, Corentin Bardet wrote: > Hi, > > Le 2022-09-11 07:39, Pankaj Jangid a écrit : > > For a few work related meetings, I have to use Google Meet. But the > > screensharing doesn't work in the Chromium installed from stable APT > > repository. Clicking on the share-sc

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 10:26, Corentin Bardet wrote: Hi, Le 2022-09-11 07:39, Pankaj Jangid a écrit : For a few work related meetings, I have to use Google Meet. But the screensharing doesn't work in the Chromium installed from stable APT repository. Clicking on the share-screen icon and t

Re: Google Chrome can share but Chromium cannot share screen

Hi, Le 2022-09-11 07:39, Pankaj Jangid a écrit : For a few work related meetings, I have to use Google Meet. But the screensharing doesn't work in the Chromium installed from stable APT repository. Clicking on the share-screen icon and then selecting any of the three options - Tab, Windows, Enti

Re: Google Chrome leaves processes around each time is closed

On 17/5/22 6:23 am, nimrod wrote: Hi, recently Google Chrome started to leave around a "chrome --enable-crashpad" process every time I closed it. Each of such processes sucks 25% of CPU. If I open another instance of Chrome and I close it, another process is created and reaches the 25% of CP

Re: Google Chrome and Bullseye upgrade: stable or bullseye

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 06:40 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 06:37:04AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > > I have all my apt lists ready for upgrading from Buster to Bullseye > except > > the separate one for Google Chrome. It currently says "stable" and it has > > been that way throug

Re: Google Chrome and Bullseye upgrade: stable or bullseye

On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 06:37 -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > I have all my apt lists ready for upgrading from Buster to Bullseye except > the separate one for Google Chrome. It currently says "stable" and it has > been that way through several upgrades. > > The instructions for the prep for the upgrade

Re: Google Chrome and Bullseye upgrade: stable or bullseye

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 06:37:04AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > I have all my apt lists ready for upgrading from Buster to Bullseye except > the separate one for Google Chrome. It currently says "stable" and it has > been that way through several upgrades. That's fine. I've done buster to bullseye

Re: google-chrome-stable vs. chromium

On Thursday 15 September 2016 11:28:49 Bob Bernstein wrote: > Aha. That describes me to a tee. Now, I put a premium on things > that "just work." So you have chosen well. Anyway, I do the same, for much the same reason, so it must be the right choice. ;-) (There are things I want to watch.) Li

Re: google-chrome-stable vs. chromium

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Eduardo Quagliato wrote: google-chrome-stable: Google's package, with its proprietary software in it (like flash and other things alike); chromium: Open-source project from which Google drawn its source (refer to http://www.chromium.org/); Thanks. Concise. I think I get it

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On Friday 03 June 2016 15:45:43 Mike McGinn wrote: > I am buying a new laptop in February, this one will be eight years old > by then. Then I shall start clean with Jessie. By next February (9 months away), shouldn't you be thinking of Stretch? It will probably already be full-frozen, and Jessie

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On 06/03/2016 10:28 AM, SamuelOPH wrote: > ​Hi Mike,​ > > 2016-06-01 6:47 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn >: > > Hi Samuel, > It is not an issue of need, it is an issue of time. I am the software > engineer / server guy at work, so I use my laptop at work and

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

​Hi Mike,​ 2016-06-01 6:47 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn : > Hi Samuel, > It is not an issue of need, it is an issue of time. I am the software > engineer / server guy at work, so I use my laptop at work and home. When > I upgraded from Squeeze it tool more than eight hours. I simply do not > have a day

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On 05/31/2016 11:15 PM, SamuelOPH wrote: > > 2016-05-31 21:21 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn >: > > Again, thanks for all the efforts. I am a bit surprised that there is > not an archive of old chrome versions. One would think they would have > the room with

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

2016-05-31 21:21 GMT-03:00 Mike McGinn : > Again, thanks for all the efforts. I am a bit surprised that there is > not an archive of old chrome versions. One would think they would have > the room with all the email account space that they give away. > ​We both know it isn't a matter of space, i

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On 05/31/2016 04:40 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > Sven Joachim wrote: > > Right, I misremembered and confused a different fact. Google at one time > said it would not intentionally remove the support for 32bit > architectures from the Chromium source, so that Distributions can still > compile it. Bu

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On 2016-05-31 21:03 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: > Ah, I see. Google compiled Chrome with a newer C++ library and broke > the dependencies for Wheezy. > > I guess they waited until Wheezy was no longer supported by Debian > outside of the LTS-Project and then dropped support for it. No, Google does

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Sven Hartge writes: > > Seems I can not install google-chrome-stable on Wheezy anymore. > > Yes, seems that way. > > Only Chromium and Firefox remain. Or time to upgrade to Jessie finally. > Flash, (Pepperflash,) for Chromium no longer works in Wheezy i386. Perhaps Opera and/or Vivaldi, (which h

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn wrote: > On 05/31/2016 02:31 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Mike McGinn wrote: >>> My system is 64 bit. I tried downloading from google with: >>> wget >>> http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/google-chrome-stable_50.0.2661.102-1_amd64.deb >> >> Try >> http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn wrote: > My system is 64 bit. I tried downloading from google with: > wget > http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/google-chrome-stable_50.0.2661.102-1_amd64.deb Try http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/pool/main/g/google-chrome-stable/google-chrome-stable_51.0.2704.63-1_amd64.deb

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On 31/05/16 01:37 PM, Mike McGinn wrote: Hell All, My hard drive in my laptop took a dump on Friday, so after installing a new one I installed Wheezy since I am not ready to move to Jessie yet. The thing is, I am running the chromium-browser which is old and seems to exit randomly. I would like

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 19:11:37 Sven Hartge wrote: > Is your system 32bit by chance? Then there will be now recent Google > Chrome, as Google discontinued the support for 32bit architectures. You can't get 64 bit for Wheezy either. Lisi

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn wrote: > My hard drive in my laptop took a dump on Friday, so after installing > a new one I installed Wheezy since I am not ready to move to Jessie > yet. > The thing is, I am running the chromium-browser which is old and seems > to exit randomly. I would like to install my previous

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:49:26AM -0400, Kenneth Jacker wrote: > Follow-up question: when "installing the packages that are needed", from > where are they obtained? > > >From the same directory as that containing the ".deb" file, from an > Internet archive or from my local /var/cache/apt/archive

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

Follow-up question: when "installing the packages that are needed", from where are they obtained? >From the same directory as that containing the ".deb" file, from an Internet archive or from my local /var/cache/apt/archives or ??? Thanks again, -Kenneth On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Kennet

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

> > Next time try "sudo gdebi google-chrome-stable_49.0.2623.75-1_amd64.deb". > It should install the packages needed if they are available. > ​OK, thanks for the "tip"! -Kenneth​

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

On 21 April 2016 at 23:45, Kenneth Jacker wrote: > > ># dpkg -i google-chrome-stable_49.0.2623.75-1_amd64.deb > > > Next time try "sudo gdebi google-chrome-stable_49.0.2623.75-1_amd64.deb". It should install the packages needed if they are available. Regards Johann -- Because experiencing

Re: google-chrome-stable - no longer functional

Sorry to reply to myself. Hearing from no one for almost a week, I decided to "check around" again and see if I couldn't find some way to restore Google Chrome ... This posting gave me the idea to "downgrade" the application: http://goo.gl/I5chaZ Looking in my system's /var/cache/apt/archiv

Re: Google Chrome

Chromium has not supported chromevox for some time now. I wonder if it's even useable with orca turned on. On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, moxalt wrote: Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:25:45 From: moxalt To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Google Chrome Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 02:26:08

Re: Google Chrome

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:28:41 -0700, Charles Chambers wrote: > I just had google-chrome-stable update to Version 46.0.2490.71-1 via > System update. There's an open bug I reported to Google on this exact > version. I checked bugs.debian.org and find that google-chrome-stable > has no package

Re: Google Chrome

Charles Chambers: > > I just had google-chrome-stable update to Version 46.0.2490.71-1 via System > update. Google Chrome is not available from Debian. You probably installed a Chrome package that automatically added Google repositories so that Chrome can be updated using apt. > There's an open b

Re: Google Chrome

Charles Chambers wrote: > I just had google-chrome-stable update to Version 46.0.2490.71-1 via > System update. There's an open bug I reported to Google on this exact > version. I checked bugs.debian.org and find that google-chrome-stable > has no package maintainer within the Debian organizati

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:57:49PM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote: > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 18:51:24 Jose Martinez wrote: > > NaCL -- Sodium Chloride -- common table salt. That just means you have > > to add your own!!:-D > > Actually, it stands f

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On Wednesday 24 June 2015 18:51:24 Jose Martinez wrote: > NaCL -- Sodium Chloride -- common table salt. That just means you have > to add your own!!:-D Actually, it stands for Native Client (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Native_Client). It is Google's attempt to re-invent javascript :-)

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

NaCL -- Sodium Chloride -- common table salt. That just means you have to add your own!!:-D On 06/22/2015 11:18 PM, Tim Beelen wrote: Wow, thanks! An actual thing I can try. I also found out in the mean time that Chromium does not come with/is not compiled with NaCl enabled (whatever that

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

Wow, thanks! An actual thing I can try. I also found out in the mean time that Chromium does not come with/is not compiled with NaCl enabled (whatever that is) and that would prevent actual execution of the plugin. Thank you for pointing me in the direction of the tools to figure out what pr

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

Say, maybe a tin-foil hat for the affected system could be designed to prevent this from happening?? :-D On 06/22/2015 05:25 AM, Darac Marjal wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:38:30PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote: On 06/21/2015 06:42 PM, John Hasler wrote: Tim Beelen writes: How do I find out wh

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 09:25:29AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Tim Beelen wrote: > > Is it true? Is Google actively listening in on my conversations? > > Google is if you're using google now, but chromium on Debian is not. No, It has to be activated manually. One can use NO

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Tim Beelen wrote: > Is it true? Is Google actively listening in on my conversations? Google is if you're using google now, but chromium on Debian is not. > Apparently this: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786909 See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:38:30PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote: > On 06/21/2015 06:42 PM, John Hasler wrote: > >Tim Beelen writes: > >>How do I find out which application is accessing what device? > > > >It's all software. There is no hardware involved at all: they use a > >virtual device. It works ev

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:14:23 +0100 Brad Rogers wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:36:50 +0300 > David Baron wrote: > > Hello David, > > >Just because I am paranoid, that does not mean they are not, in fact, > >after me. > > If they *are* after you, you're not paranoid. > But maybe they are aft

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:36:50 +0300 David Baron wrote: Hello David, >Just because I am paranoid, that does not mean they are not, in fact, >after me. If they *are* after you, you're not paranoid. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever imme

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

> > >>> How do I find out which application is accessing what device? > > >> > > >> It's all software. There is no hardware involved at all: they use a > > >> virtual device. It works even when the computer is off. Doesn't matter > > >> if your machine has a microphone or even any audio input c

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On Monday 22 June 2015 12:49:19 Stuart Longland wrote: > On 22/06/15 12:38, Ric Moore wrote: > > On 06/21/2015 06:42 PM, John Hasler wrote: > >> Tim Beelen writes: > >>> How do I find out which application is accessing what device? > >> > >> It's all software. There is no hardware involved at all

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On 22/06/15 12:38, Ric Moore wrote: > On 06/21/2015 06:42 PM, John Hasler wrote: >> Tim Beelen writes: >>> How do I find out which application is accessing what device? >> >> It's all software. There is no hardware involved at all: they use a >> virtual device. It works even when the computer is

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

On 06/21/2015 06:42 PM, John Hasler wrote: Tim Beelen writes: How do I find out which application is accessing what device? It's all software. There is no hardware involved at all: they use a virtual device. It works even when the computer is off. Doesn't matter if your machine has a microp

Re: Google Chrome and Open-Source derivative listening to me without my approval

Tim Beelen writes: > How do I find out which application is accessing what device? It's all software. There is no hardware involved at all: they use a virtual device. It works even when the computer is off. Doesn't matter if your machine has a microphone or even any audio input capability. --

Re: google-chrome-unstable apparently removes its executable

Le 09.10.2013 02:43, Stephen Allen a écrit : On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:42:15AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: Updating two testing systems this morning, I found that my Chrome suddenly became unable to find any web pages. Attempting to relaunch, it wasn't there! 'which google-chrome' return

Re: google-chrome-unstable apparently removes its executable

On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:42:15AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > Updating two testing systems this morning, I found that my Chrome > suddenly became unable to find any web pages. Attempting to relaunch, > it wasn't there! > > 'which google-chrome' returned nothing. I tried 'sudo apt-get install

Re: google chrome browser being kept back on squeeze?

Never mind. Further reading in http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/kfreebsd-i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html specifically, section 4.3, Preparing sources for APT, basically explains how the upgrade is going to work, and what to do with the external repository source lines. Sorry for the

Re: google chrome browser being kept back on squeeze?

Okay, On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Curt wrote: > On 2013-06-23, Joel Rees wrote: > > > > Since sometime last week, apt-get upgrade and dist-upgrade both report > that > > google-chrome-stable has been kept back. > > > > Anyone else seeing this? Anyone know why? > > > > I'm seeing it. Whee

Re: google chrome browser being kept back on squeeze?

On 2013-06-23, Joel Rees wrote: > > Since sometime last week, apt-get upgrade and dist-upgrade both report that > google-chrome-stable has been kept back. > > Anyone else seeing this? Anyone know why? > I'm seeing it. Wheezy (cough) is now stable is the why. The following packages have unmet de

Re: google chrome browser being kept back on squeeze?

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > Since sometime last week, apt-get upgrade and dist-upgrade both report that > google-chrome-stable has been kept back. > > Anyone else seeing this? Anyone know why? It may be because chrome requires (and so depends on) a newer libc6. I saw this

Re: " google chrome has stopped updating and no longer supports this version of your O.S."

I don't like a chroot that much. It has got some advantages compared to a virtual machine, but also can become hard to maintain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.d

Re: " google chrome has stopped updating and no longer supports this version of your O.S."

Thanks for the info Kevin Chadwick 2013. április 6., szombat napon a következőt írta: > > I'm using Debian Squeeze X86 - 2.6.32-5-686 - and Chrome always show > > me this message. > > > > Why? How to solve this? > > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=224537 > > Perhaps it will be

Re: " google chrome has stopped updating and no longer supports this version of your O.S."

> I'm using Debian Squeeze X86 - 2.6.32-5-686 - and Chrome always show > me this message. > > Why? How to solve this? https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=224537 Perhaps it will be fixed. -- ___ 'Write programs

Re: " google chrome has stopped updating and no longer supports this version of your O.S."

> you > could install a minimal up-to-date Linux distro to a virtual machine > running on Squeeze If you are short of memory, you don't actually need to waste the memory to run it either, you can quite easily run it from a chroot (you may have to sort dbus out) and assuming the software doesn't re

Re: " google chrome has stopped updating and no longer supports this version of your O.S."

Yes, I know Debian is more stable than more updated by softwares. So what will I get and stable version of Chrome will arrive I will get it automatically by Update? Ralf Mardorf 2013. április 6., szombat napon a következőt írta: > On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 10:55 +0200, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote: > > Hi,

Re: " google chrome has stopped updating and no longer supports this version of your O.S."

On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 10:55 +0200, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm using Debian Squeeze X86 - 2.6.32-5-686 - and Chrome always show > me this message. > > > Why? How to solve this? > > > Thanks Building from source, assumed there is a source for Chrome. If Chrom shouldn't be open sour

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On 07/06/2012 11:21 PM, Lisi wrote: I have just installed Google Chrome on a vanilla almost default Squeeze/LXDE installation. It is there, but won't run. I have tried: click on icon in menu - nothing happens launch from launcher - command is accepted, but launcher then hangs run from termi

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On Saturday 07 July 2012 11:47:28 Sharon Kimble wrote: > What version of google-chrome did you install? There are three > versions available, stable, unstable and beta. I installed stable and > got it running with no problems at all on squeeze. I accepted the one that Google offered me, so presuma

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On Saturday 07 July 2012 11:55:38 Paul Saunders wrote: > Basically, strace has probably given you a lot of good information, you > just need to know how to interpret it (if you want, install > manpages-dev for the documentation on all those system calls). I need to capture it first! I'll concentr

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:46:08 +0100 Lisi wrote: > On Saturday 07 July 2012 08:19:28 Richard Hector wrote: > > On 07/07/12 18:21, Lisi wrote: > > > I have just installed Google Chrome on a vanilla almost default > > > Squeeze/LXDE installation. It is there, but won't run. I have > > > tried: > > >

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On 07/07/2012, Richard Hector wrote: > On 07/07/12 18:21, Lisi wrote: >> I have just installed Google Chrome on a vanilla almost default >> Squeeze/LXDE >> installation. It is there, but won't run. I have tried: >> >> click on icon in menu - nothing happens >> >> launch from launcher - command i

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On Saturday 07 July 2012 08:19:28 Richard Hector wrote: > On 07/07/12 18:21, Lisi wrote: > > I have just installed Google Chrome on a vanilla almost default > > Squeeze/LXDE installation. It is there, but won't run. I have tried: > > > > click on icon in menu - nothing happens > > > > launch from

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On 2012-07-07, Lisi wrote: > I have just installed Google Chrome on a vanilla almost default Squeeze/LXDE > installation. It is there, but won't run. I have tried: You could try this: google-chrome --disable-bundled-ppapi-flash Couldn't hurt. If that works, you might want to do an about:pl

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On 7 July 2012 07:21, Lisi wrote: > I have just installed Google Chrome on a vanilla almost default > Squeeze/LXDE > installation. It is there, but won't run. I have tried: > > click on icon in menu - nothing happens > > launch from launcher - command is accepted, but launcher then hangs > > ru

Re: Google Chrome is installed but won't run

On 07/07/12 18:21, Lisi wrote: I have just installed Google Chrome on a vanilla almost default Squeeze/LXDE installation. It is there, but won't run. I have tried: click on icon in menu - nothing happens launch from launcher - command is accepted, but launcher then hangs run from terminal -

Re: google-chrome pdf editor

Curt wrote: On 2011-09-05, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, Google-chrome has a builtin pdf editor. But when I select a pdf document, for example from www.irs.gov, and edit it, it acts as if it is editing it, but when I save it none of the changes are there. Anyone have this problem? Yes, sam

Re: google-chrome pdf editor

Il 06/09/2011 17:23, Camaleón ha scritto: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:58:25 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: ---cut--- Maybe you can try with another PDF editor. May be libreoffice draw? :-) Greetings, -- Ciao Genki ):o)) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists

Re: google-chrome pdf editor

On 2011-09-05, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi, > > Google-chrome has a builtin pdf editor. > But when I select a pdf document, for example from www.irs.gov, and edit > it, it acts as if it is editing it, but when I save it none of the > changes are there. > > Anyone have this problem? > Yes, same

Re: google-chrome pdf editor

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:58:25 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Camaleón wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:54:13 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: >> >>> Google-chrome has a builtin pdf editor. >> >> An editor or a viewer? > > Aha, chrome://plugins says 'Chrome PDF Viewer'. But why would it allow > you

Re: google-chrome pdf editor

Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:54:13 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Google-chrome has a builtin pdf editor. An editor or a viewer? Aha, chrome://plugins says 'Chrome PDF Viewer'. But why would it allow you to change text fields? Most PDF viewers can also fill forms but still are

Re: google-chrome pdf editor

On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:54:13 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Google-chrome has a builtin pdf editor. An editor or a viewer? Most PDF viewers can also fill forms but still are not considered as "editors". > But when I select a pdf document, for example from www.irs.gov, and > edit it, it acts

Re: [OT] Re: google chrome "big brother"

On Saturday 18 December 2010 11:27:49 Thierry Chatelet wrote: > > Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet > > installed Chromium). > > > > Thanks, > > Lisi > > > > l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium > > You want chromium-browser > Thierry Thanks, all. After all that, Chro

Re: [OT] Re: google chrome "big brother" - erratum

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:25:13 + Lisi shared this with us all: >> > AFAIK, what is open source is Chromium but not Chrome. >> >> Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet >> installed Chromium). >> >> Thanks, >> Lisi ~$ aptitude search chromium-browser i chromium-bro

Re: [OT] Re: google chrome "big brother"

> Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet installed > Chromium). > > Thanks, > Lisi > > l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium You want chromium-browser Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: [OT] Re: google chrome "big brother" - erratum

On Saturday 18 December 2010 11:19:34 Lisi wrote: > On Friday 17 December 2010 18:48:42 Camaleón wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:41:55 -0800, S Mathias wrote: > > > Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable), BSD (source > > > code and Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD

Re: [OT] Re: google chrome "big brother"

On Friday 17 December 2010 18:48:42 Camaleón wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:41:55 -0800, S Mathias wrote: > > Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable), BSD (source > > code and Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD License with > > proprietary parts (source code and chrom

[OT] Re: google chrome "big brother"

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:41:55 -0800, S Mathias wrote: (please, avoid using html format ;-) ) > Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable), BSD (source > code and Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD License with > proprietary parts (source code and chromium 5 beta executab

Re: google chrome mailto: in lxde

On Du, 04 iul 10, 12:41:12, Scott Lair wrote: Using squeeze with the lxde desktop. I installed google chrome and when I click on a link with a mailto:, chrome opens up another browser window and waits. I noticed that under gnome it works fine - calls up evolution like it should. Is there

Re: google chrome mailto: in lxde

On Du, 04 iul 10, 12:41:12, Scott Lair wrote: > Using squeeze with the lxde desktop. I installed google chrome and > when I click on a link with a mailto:, chrome opens up another > browser window and waits. > > I noticed that under gnome it works fine - calls up evolution like > it should. > >

Re: google chrome extensions

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:23:47 +0200, David Baron in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > I got the extensions at the link suggested! > > Get listed by "chrome://extensions", not "about://..." Correct. I don't think I said otherwise though. LOL > They work. Of course, is this whole thing contra to th

Re: google chrome extensions

On Tuesday 27 October 2009 21:08:55 David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 20:23:54 debian-user-digest- > > requ...@lists.debian.org wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium > > > build ( 4.0.223.11)? > > > They seem to install f

Re: google chrome extensions

S. Fishpaste wrote: On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:30:57 -0400, Bogdan in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: Hey, Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium build ( 4.0.223.11)? They seem to install fine but they do not work, and also, are not getting listed when "about://

Re: google chrome extensions

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:08:55 +0200, David Baron in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: [ ...] > Where does one install these extensions? > > Popups block messages do appear, but about://extensions simply talks about > chrome, chromium, firefox, safari, etc. A little too hasty in my previous respons

Re: google chrome extensions

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:08:55 +0200, David Baron in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 20:23:54 debian-user-digest- > requ...@lists.debian.org wrote: >> > Hey, >> > >> > Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium >> > build ( 4.0.223.11)? >> > T

Re: google chrome extensions

On Tuesday 27 October 2009 20:23:54 debian-user-digest- requ...@lists.debian.org wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium > > build ( 4.0.223.11)? > > They seem to install fine but they do not work, and also, are not > > getting listed when "

Re: google chrome extensions

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:30:57 -0400, Bogdan in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: > Hey, > > Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium > build ( 4.0.223.11)? > They seem to install fine but they do not work, and also, are not > getting listed when "about://extensions/". >

Re: google chrome extensions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:16:56 -0600 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest > chromium build ( 4.0.223.11)? > They seem to install fine but they do not work, and also, are not > gett

Re: google chrome extensions

Frank McCormick wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:30:31 -0600 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:30:57 -0400 Bogdan wrote: Hey, Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium build ( 4.0.223.11)? They seem to ins

Re: google chrome extensions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:30:31 -0600 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:30:57 -0400 > > Bogdan wrote: > > > >> Hey, > >> > >> Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest > >> chromium build ( 4.0.223.11)? > >> They se

Re: google chrome extensions

Frank McCormick wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:30:57 -0400 Bogdan wrote: Hey, Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium build ( 4.0.223.11)? They seem to install fine but they do not work, and also, are not getting

Re: google chrome extensions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:30:57 -0400 Bogdan wrote: > Hey, > > Has anyone managed to get the extensions going for the latest chromium > build ( 4.0.223.11)? > They seem to install fine but they do not work, and also, are not > getting listed when "a

Re: Google Chrome

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, marc wrote: >> Patrick Wiseman said: >> >>> It doesn't do authentication yet, so password-protected sites just hang. >> >> It authenticates just fine in the cases I've thrown at it. > > It prompts you for u

Re: Google Chrome

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, marc wrote: > Patrick Wiseman said: > >> It doesn't do authentication yet, so password-protected sites just hang. > > It authenticates just fine in the cases I've thrown at it. It prompts you for username and password? For me, it just sits there spinning. Patric

Re: Google Chrome

Patrick Wiseman said: > It doesn't do authentication yet, so password-protected sites just hang. It authenticates just fine in the cases I've thrown at it. -- Best, Marc "Change requires small steps." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Re: Google Chrome

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:34:15AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > > It creates a daily cron job to check for updates and appears > temporarily to modify sources.list to grab the update. Some find this > behavior offensive, but it's by no means the only package which > creates a cron job which d

  1   2   >