On Mon, Jan 26, 1998 at 06:45:48PM -0500, David E. Scott wrote:
> Marcus,
> I've now bookmarked that URL. Thanks, and I'll be visiting the site
> again for additional details. I'll certainly give you an email "hollar"
> if I have any questions about it.
> Thanks again,
> Dave
No prob.
One notable difference between SB32 and 64 is that if you want to
expand the wavetable RAM, the 32 boards can take 30-pin SIMMs
(With the exception of "AWE32 Value" that can't be upgraded.),
while the 64 boards needs "Creative RAM upgrade" modules.
You can find info on SB32/64 at http://www.lysat
Marcus,
I've now bookmarked that URL. Thanks, and I'll be visiting the site
again for additional details. I'll certainly give you an email "hollar"
if I have any questions about it.
Thanks again,
Dave
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> So, to get the most out of your sound card, check my HO
On Sun, Jan 25, 1998 at 10:24:50PM -0500, David E. Scott wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Try to get a SB 32, but stay away from SB 64!
> >
> > Reason:
> >
> > The SB32 does work fine with the awe patch to the kernel (available as
> > Debian package).
> >
> > The SB64 will work , too, but on
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Try to get a SB 32, but stay away from SB 64!
>
> Reason:
>
> The SB32 does work fine with the awe patch to the kernel (available as
> Debian package).
>
> The SB64 will work , too, but only as a SB32 (because the additional 32 are
> windoze driver only).
>
Marcus,
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> BTW: If he hadn't explicitly request a SB compatible crad, I would never
> have suggested one ;) I dislike the marketing politic of Creative Labs.
> I bought my SB AWE 32 before I started to work with Linux :-(
Ok. I'm not asking explicity for a SB c
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 11:39:39PM -0500, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 06:29:14PM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> So what is the reason to stay away from SB AWE64?
> Especially if one has a dual-boot system?
No reason if you have a dual-boot system ;)
You can however use
ninjaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Two other sound cards with similar specs, and that I've heard good
review
>from the linux crowd on are the Ensoniq AudioPCI, which is sbpro
hardware
>compatible, and ViperMax (http://www.computex.com.tw/synergy), which is
I HAVE an AudioPCI...and I have had it fo
I have a SB 32 PnP that I got cheap a while back, will it work with
the AWE patch to the kernel? I also have isapnptools running if that
makes a difference...
Yes, it will work.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-
Bill Vinson wrote:
>
> I have a SB 32 PnP that I got cheap a while back, will it work with
> the AWE patch to the kernel? I also have isapnptools running if that
> makes a difference...
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
Yes, it will work (I have one, too). Install a recent doc package from
hamm (that with the
I have a SB 32 PnP that I got cheap a while back, will it work with
the AWE patch to the kernel? I also have isapnptools running if that
makes a difference...
Thanks,
Bill
---Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The SB32 does work fine with the awe patch to the kernel (available as
>
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 11:35:39PM -0700, ninjaz wrote:
> I've been extremely pleased with my GUS Max - excellent sound quality -
> wavetable and up to 48,000hz (better than cd quality), and it works with
Two things though; firstly, last time I heard, Gravis had gone bang,
so no more new GUS cards
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 11:39:39PM -0500, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> What is in contradiction with your HOWTO is they explicitly say
> that sound should NOT be compiled as a module as it will default volume
> and other settings each time application access audio devices.
That would be true if you use
> On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 06:29:14PM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> > Can anybody recommend a sound card based upon the following criteria:
> >
> > * Compatability with Linux
> > * SBPro compatability
> > * Sound Quality
> > * Price
>
> Try to get a SB 32, but stay away from SB 64!
>
> Reason:
>
>
>Can anybody recommend a sound card based upon the following criteria:
>
>* Compatability with Linux * SBPro compatability * Sound Quality * Price
>
>Thanks! There seems to be a shortage of sound card reviews... -- Jon
>Nelson U of MN Housing and Res. Life Computing Supervisor
I've been extreme
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 11:32:51PM -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>The SB64 will work , too, but only as a SB32 (because the additional 32 are
>windoze driver only).
>
> Yes, but Creative Labs does give some reasons (other than the extra 32
> software voices) why you would want a SB64 over an SB3
> On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 06:29:14PM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> > Can anybody recommend a sound card based upon the following criteria:
> >
> > * Compatability with Linux
> > * SBPro compatability
> > * Sound Quality
> > * Price
>
> Try to get a SB 32, but stay away from SB 64!
>
> Reason:
>
>
The SB64 will work , too, but only as a SB32 (because the additional 32 are
windoze driver only).
Yes, but Creative Labs does give some reasons (other than the extra 32
software voices) why you would want a SB64 over an SB32, on their web
page. The $10 or so difference in price (at least wh
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 06:29:14PM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Can anybody recommend a sound card based upon the following criteria:
>
> * Compatability with Linux
> * SBPro compatability
> * Sound Quality
> * Price
Try to get a SB 32, but stay away from SB 64!
Reason:
The SB32 does work fine wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
