On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:12:46AM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> 2. Did a "dselect update" (so that the available file get updated as
> well). This doesn't seem to be the case when using "apt-get update".
Correct.
> 3. Did "apt-get install apt apt-utils dpkg debconf perl". This worked
> without an
Hi!
Finally took the time to *try* to upgrade from Potato to Woody.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Thomas R. Shemanske wrote:
> [...]
> Feel free to post your intermediate results.
Ok, here they are. I did the following:
1. Changed /etc/apt/sources.list so that it contains the following
entries:
deb h
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 04:39:37AM -0500, Bob Thibodeau wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:13:53AM -0800, Terry Carney wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Kuhn wrote:
> >
> > > The original line 33 of access.conf was "order allow,deny". I tried
> > > changing this to "Order Allow,Deny" and "Ord
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:13:53AM -0800, Terry Carney wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Kuhn wrote:
>
> > The original line 33 of access.conf was "order allow,deny". I tried
> > changing this to "Order Allow,Deny" and "Order allow,deny". All
> > variations that I tried resulted in a syntax err
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Kuhn wrote:
> The original line 33 of access.conf was "order allow,deny". I tried
> changing this to "Order Allow,Deny" and "Order allow,deny". All
> variations that I tried resulted in a syntax error on line 33 when I ran
> "apache -t". From a quick scan of the apache
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:45:47AM -0500, Bob Thibodeau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:27:44PM -0500, John Kuhn wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a solution to the second bug (#131104) yet. It is a problem
> > when you upgrade from apache 1.3.9 (stable) to 1.3.22. The solution does
> > not seem t
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:27:44PM -0500, John Kuhn wrote:
>
> I don't have a solution to the second bug (#131104) yet. It is a problem
> when you upgrade from apache 1.3.9 (stable) to 1.3.22. The solution does
> not seem to be as simple as correcting the capitalization in the config
> file to t
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:35:37PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there something like a "upgrade HOWTO" describing upgrading
> Potato->Woody in more detail? If so, pointers are most welcome.
>
> Is it "safe" to upgrade to Woody/testing at present or may it leave the
> system unusable?
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:15:02PM -0500, eric wrote:
> >See my web page for woody transition.
> > http://qref.sf.net/quick/ Follow link to the woody upgrade.
>
> I ever follow your link, http://qref.sf.net/quick, but it is not work
Strange, it works from me. I checked locale "en" "fr".
Ar
Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:56:36PM -0500, Thomas R. Shemanske wrote:
Check out http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/, in particular the
release notes.
In addition, there are somewhat general rules (which others on the list
will no doubt improve upon):
Change your sources
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:56:36PM -0500, Thomas R. Shemanske wrote:
> Check out http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/, in particular the
> release notes.
>
> In addition, there are somewhat general rules (which others on the list
> will no doubt improve upon):
>
> Change your sources.list to p
Holger Rauch wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Is there something like a "upgrade HOWTO" describing upgrading
>Potato->Woody in more detail? If so, pointers are most welcome.
I'd recommend that you go for a base install of Potato then commit the
dist-upgrade to woody. That way you minimize breakage in the packagin
Check out http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/, in particular the
release notes.
In addition, there are somewhat general rules (which others on the list
will no doubt improve upon):
Change your sources.list to point to woody (realizing you may actually
have to pull a few things from sid whi
13 matches
Mail list logo
