Re: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-26 Thread Pigeon
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:29:46PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:49:55PM +, Pigeon wrote: No I didn't, you did :-) > > > > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make" > > > > the drivers. > > > > All I had to do was "make" to get them to load (I c

Re: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-25 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:49:55PM +, Pigeon wrote: > > > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make" > > > the drivers. > > > All I had to do was "make" to get them to load (I couldn't just load > > > them). They still don't want to load even though they're in > > > /etc/modul

Re: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-25 Thread Pigeon
ma Jane Hogbin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:35 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX > > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make" > > the drivers. > > Al

RE: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-24 Thread Narins, Josh
: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:48:35PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > > Yes. There are a lot of things that don't make sense about > debian on my > > laptop. Including why usb, parallel printing and cdburning > won'

*install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-23 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:48:35PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > Yes. There are a lot of things that don't make sense about debian on my > laptop. Including why usb, parallel printing and cdburning won't work. D'uh. I'd recompiled the kernel but not pointed lilo to the right bzImage. Tonight I

Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-23 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:13:10AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:09:01PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote: > > > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows > > > system stopped work

Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-23 Thread Deryk Barker
Thus spake Emma Jane Hogbin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote: > > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows > > system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv > > driver i'm using only wa

Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:09:01PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote: > > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows > > system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv > > driver i

Re: GeForce4 MX

2003-01-22 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote: > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows > system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv > driver i'm using only wants to work on nvidia cards up to the GeForce3, at > least

RE: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody

2002-11-22 Thread Mike Dresser
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Andrew R Reid wrote: > With all due respect Mike, you should look at using the nvidia accelerated > driver. I've installed it on three machines this week, and it is not only > fairly simple with Debians excellent package management system, it also > makes an incredible differ

RE: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody

2002-11-22 Thread Andrew R Reid
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Dresser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 12:42 AM > To: Edward Guldemond > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote: >

Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody

2002-11-20 Thread Mike Dresser
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote: > nv is the unaccelerated driver...nvidia is the accelerated driver. In > order to get accelerated GL, you need the nvidia driver. > > Read the /usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx/README.gz if you have compiled and > installed and the accelerated driver kit. Ok

Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody

2002-11-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:47:47PM -0500, Edward Guldemond wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Aedificator wrote: > > After a fresh install of Woody, X crashes with the message "no screens found". I >attach the relative log file and config file. > > Section "Device" > > Identifier

Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody

2002-11-19 Thread Edward Guldemond
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:25:36PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote: > > > This is wrong. It should read: > > > > Section "Device" > > Identifier "GeForce Card (Accelerated)" > > Driver "nvidia" > > EndSection > > > > That is, change t

Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody

2002-11-19 Thread Mike Dresser
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote: > This is wrong. It should read: > > Section "Device" > Identifier "GeForce Card (Accelerated)" > Driver "nvidia" > EndSection > > That is, change the driver from "nv" to "nvidia", and then remove the > option with the FBDev. > T

Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody

2002-11-19 Thread Edward Guldemond
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Aedificator wrote: > After a fresh install of Woody, X crashes with the message "no screens found". I >attach the relative log file and config file. > Section "Device" > Identifier "Generic Video Card" > Driver "nv" > Option "UseFBDev" "true" > EndSe