> No, but filing a software patent will earn you the enmity of the Debian
> developers.
Not only developers...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 03 June 2004 8:03 pm, Alvin Oga wrote:
> as soon as one loads mozilla .. you have a mix of gpl and mpl
>
> and one already have a mix of licenses .. even in debian ? [1]
> see openwall patches vs glibc, procps
If you _really_ want to see them all, or at least most of them:
gre
Please do not CC me. Good rule of thumb: unless the Reply-To or
Mail-Followup-To tells you to send elsewhere, don't CC it when you're
replying.
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> There's not 40 GPLs, there's one.
>
> version 1 and version 2 ...
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Paul Johnson wrote:
> There's not 40 GPLs, there's one.
version 1 and version 2 ... can be counted as 1 or 2 ??
> And the vast majority of software
> in Debian is licensed under it. Check the Debian Free Software
> Guidelines for a general idea of what you can and can't do
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi ya adam
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Adam Aube wrote:
>
>> The only "strings" attached to the GPL involve distribution and derivative
>> works, and are as follows (paraphrased):
>>
>> 1) If you distribute the software, you must make the source freely availabl
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 14:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> doesn't that depend on which "gpl" license ... ( there's over 40 "gpl"
> license ... but only 2(?) gnu.org "gpl" license
>
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses
Huh? This is the first time I've ever seen *anyo
Howard Levine wrote:
> Should I develop a patentable extension to the Debian opus, is there any
> claim against my profit?
Adam Aube writes:
> Not unless it is a derived work.
Nor if it is. The licenses (not everything is GPL) on the components of
Debian are about copyright, not patent.
--
John
hi ya adam
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Adam Aube wrote:
> The only "strings" attached to the GPL involve distribution and derivative
> works, and are as follows (paraphrased):
>
> 1) If you distribute the software, you must make the source freely available
> 2) Derivative works must also be released un
Howard Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I understand the license to freely copy, alter, and distribute the
> software. Does anyone have claim against my USE of it, or my profit
> with it at business other than programming per se?
Yes, but only if you don't also release your source code. IAN
Howard Levine wrote:
> I understand the license to freely copy, alter, and distribute the
> software. Does anyone have claim against my USE of it, or my profit with
> it at business other than programming per se?
There is nothing that prevents you from making money off of the use or sale
of GPL
Howard Levine writes:
> I understand the license to freely copy, alter, and distribute the
> software. Does anyone have claim against my USE of it, or my profit with
> it at business other than programming per se?
No one has any claim against your use of Debian or your profit by it, full
stop.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
