Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-14 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 15:09, Bill Moseley wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote: > > > I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this > > > version can't compile all the driv

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-14 Thread Greg Folkert
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 16:46, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > I believe it's more a question of what the authors recommend/support, > from the README: > > COMPILING the kernel: > > - Make sure you have gcc 2.95.3 available. gcc 2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2) may >also work but is not as safe, and *gcc 2.7.2

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-14 Thread tmcd
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >#!/bin/bash ... ># Make it so make-kpkg patches the source >PATCH_THE_KERNEL="YES" The variable PATCH_THE_KERNEL is not used later in the script. Since there is no "export", it's not put into the environment (unless there's a bash option for that and you

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Moseley
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:14:22PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 15:09, Bill Moseley wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote: > > > > I just upgraded to the current Sarge and als

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Moseley
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote: > > I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this > > version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version > > should I use? And

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-14 Thread Greg Folkert
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >#!/bin/bash > ... > ># Make it so make-kpkg patches the source > >PATCH_THE_KERNEL="YES" > > The variable PATCH_THE_KERNEL is not used later in the script. Since > there is no "export", it's not p

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-10 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote: > I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this > version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version > should I use? And how do I set this version (Environment variable?) > without deinstalling

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-07 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 15:46, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:19:49PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:14:22PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 15:09, Bill Moseley wrote: > > > > > > > Was I just lucky? What's the issue with gcc 3.

Re: GCC for kernel compilation

2003-08-07 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:19:49PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:14:22PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 15:09, Bill Moseley wrote: > > > > > Was I just lucky? What's the issue with gcc 3.3 and kernel > > > building? > > > > Well, you shouldn't need