On 2011-12-24 18:15:34 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> No doubt it's powerful, and you can do powerful things. The problem is that
> the syntax is so ideosyncratic, that I'm so relieved to get someting finally
> to do what I need, that I can't be bothered expressing it in a very concise
> way.
W
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 06:15:34PM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 24/12/11 17:34, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >On 2011-12-24 17:06:38 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >>Yep, that's PERL for you. Having taken over the maintenance of a large
> >>PERL project, I've come to the conclusion that it's
On 24/12/11 17:34, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2011-12-24 17:06:38 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Yep, that's PERL for you. Having taken over the maintenance of a large
PERL project, I've come to the conclusion that it's IMHO the worst
programming language ever invented. Totally non-intuitive.
On 2011-12-24 17:06:38 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Yep, that's PERL for you. Having taken over the maintenance of a large
> PERL project, I've come to the conclusion that it's IMHO the worst
> programming language ever invented. Totally non-intuitive.
I completely disagree. It's a very power
4 matches
Mail list logo
