Re: Funky email disclaimer

2002-02-02 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Jason Scheffler wrote: > My apologies then if I came across snarky. I read your post as that was the > "law" and not a recommendation. BTW theres some interesting reading here if > you back up to the main page. What, http://ursine.dyndns.org/ ? Yeah, I know. It's my serve

Re: Funky email disclaimer

2002-02-02 Thread Jason Scheffler
On Saturday 02 February 2002 08:46 pm, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Jason Scheffler wrote: > > > http://ursine.dyndns.org/jargon/html/entry/McQuary-Limit.html > > > > Nice like too bad it doesn't work. > > Sorry, mybad. > http://ursine.dyndns.org/jargon/html/entry/McQuary-limit

Re: Funky email disclaimer

2002-02-02 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Jason Scheffler wrote: > > http://ursine.dyndns.org/jargon/html/entry/McQuary-Limit.html > Nice like too bad it doesn't work. Sorry, mybad. http://ursine.dyndns.org/jargon/html/entry/McQuary-limit.html > Sides there are no laws just RFC It's just > annoying is all to have a h

Re: Funky email disclaimer

2002-02-02 Thread Jason Scheffler
On Saturday 02 February 2002 11:10 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Cameron Kerr wrote: > > >Yow, not only does the legal team have no clue about technology, but no > > >clue about the McQuary Limit, to boot. > > > > The _what???_ limit? Is that the `no more than 4 lines in you

Re: Funky email disclaimer

2002-02-02 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Cameron Kerr wrote: > >Yow, not only does the legal team have no clue about technology, but no > >clue about the McQuary Limit, to boot. > > The _what???_ limit? Is that the `no more than 4 lines in your sig' limit? Yes. http://ursine.dyndns.org/jargon/html/entry/McQuary-Limi

Re: Funky email disclaimer

2002-02-01 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:44:46AM +1300, Cameron Kerr wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > >Yow, not only does the legal team have no clue about technology, but no > >clue about the McQuary Limit, to boot. > > The _what???_ limit? Is that the `no more than 4 lines in your si

Re: Funky email disclaimer

2002-02-01 Thread Cameron Kerr
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: >Yow, not only does the legal team have no clue about technology, but no >clue about the McQuary Limit, to boot. The _what???_ limit? Is that the `no more than 4 lines in your sig' limit? Cameron Kerr -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepages.paradise