On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:47:46PM +0200, Colemont Bert said
> ok, I cannot find what is wrong,... any help?
Read /usr/share/doc/php4/README.Debian.gz
--
Words of the day: STARLAN Freeh TELINT BLU-114/B White House CIDA 2600 Magazine
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2004-06-29, Jacob S. penned:
>
> I think Monique has the solution, but be sure to look at it closely.
> You mention installing _php3_ and she includes apache config info for
> _php4_. There are several ways to fix this, but I strongly recommend
> upgrading to php4, since it's included in Woody a
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:53:38 -0600
"Monique Y. Mudama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-06-28, Colemont Bert penned:
> > Help!
> >
> > I run an apache 1.3 on my debian-sarge, and I have installed php3
> > and the fp extension,... but evrytime I go to my page: index.php the
> > browser want's t
On 2004-06-28, Colemont Bert penned:
> Help!
>
> I run an apache 1.3 on my debian-sarge, and I have installed php3 and
> the fp extension,... but evrytime I go to my page: index.php the
> browser want's to download it. I allready have poked around in the
> mime.types but I can't get it working cor
ok, I cannot find what is wrong,... any help?
"Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Colemont Bert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Help!
>
> I run an apache 1.3 on my debian-sarge, and I have installed php3 and the fp
> extension,... but evrytime I go to my page: index.php the browser want's to
> download it.
> I allready have poked around in the mime.types but I can't get it work
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 02:34:13AM +0200, Mozzi wrote:
> Can someone please point me @ docs to install frontpage 2002 server
> extentions on woody.
Have you had any luck with this? I also work at an ISP. Currently we
do have Frontpage 2000 extensions running on a RedHat box. I am told
Frontpage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 07:24, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> What is your final goal? I see three distinct possible courses of
>> action.
> Weller... to host frontpage sites on my webserver?
Right, but for those
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 18:48, you wrote:
> Mozzi,
> I haven't done this yet but, I'm also curious about how to would you
> forward to me what you learn?
>
Hi Kevin
It was a strugle but we got it going in the end ;-)
Basically what I did was follow the istructions that I got here
http://www.jnu
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 07:24, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> What is your final goal? I see three distinct possible courses of
> action.
Weller... to host frontpage sites on my webserver?
>
Being an ISP that kinda makes sense doesn't it?
> 1) The more-work route: Cut your losses and scrap the Fron
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Mozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>Can someone please point me @ docs to install frontpage 2002 server
>>>extentions on woody.
>> What is your final goal? I see three distinct possible courses of
>> action.
>> 1) The more-w
Paul Johnson wrote:
Mozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Can someone please point me @ docs to install frontpage 2002 server
extentions on woody.
What is your final goal? I see three distinct possible courses of
action.
1) The more-work route: Cut your losses and scrap the Frontpage idea,
post
Mozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone please point me @ docs to install frontpage 2002 server
> extentions on woody.
What is your final goal? I see three distinct possible courses of
action.
1) The more-work route: Cut your losses and scrap the Frontpage idea,
post what your final
Your best bet is to either:
1. Install apache from deb packages and then customize it as
needed. Then install your libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak
2. Manually buld the libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak extensions from tgz.
(that is why it is best to stick with all debs. Plus it will help to keep
y
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frontpage
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:54:28AM -0400, Reaz Baksh wrote:
> I'm trying to install Frontpage extensions on a web site I have. When
I
> install 'libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak 1.6.2-6.deb' it fails because
it
> said apache not inst
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:54:28AM -0400, Reaz Baksh wrote:
> I'm trying to install Frontpage extensions on a web site I have. When I
> install 'libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak 1.6.2-6.deb' it fails because it
> said apache not installed. Well I do have Apache installed but not
> through apt-get.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:54:28AM -0400, Reaz Baksh wrote:
> I'm trying to install Frontpage extensions on a web site I have.
DO NOT DO THIS. Frontpage extentions are an excellent way to get
your box rooted so hard it'll need a grief counselor.
- -
"P.A. Barrow" wrote:
> Is there a library that can be installed to resolve this issue? Is it
> possible to implement the Frontpage extensions on a Debian system, most
> of the documentation for FPE imples RedHat was used.
libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 is the package you want. and yes it is possible
to se
> Can anyone offer omse info on adding frontpage extensions to
The easiest way I found was using mod_frontpage (www.freshmeat.net) with
apache 1.3.12. The good news is the mod_frontpage is pretty much cookie
cutter. The problem is 1.3.12 requires you to download the latest apache
source and comp
On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 12:35:55PM -0400, Paul McHale wrote:
>
> 3. The only additions is virtual hosts. If you use them, make sure to
> replace all occurrences of:
>
> AllowOverride X with
> AllowOverride All
Of course, this means you can't control the Options directive anymore...
Things lik
"Paul McHale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you are interested in implementing Frontpage server extensions with
>apache, it isn't that bad. Here are a few pointers:
>
>1. Don't use apt-get. Download the source and compile yourself. This puts
>apache in /usr/local where most documentation I have
Hello.
In "frozen" it is in the section main/binary/www
Michelle
At 14:28 31.01.2000 -0800, you wrote
> This was the original Message:
> Hi all,
> anyone knows if there is frontpage extensions to Apache and where to get
>them?
> Thanks, Paulo Henrique
>
try going to http://www.darkorb.net/pub/frontpage/
there is a company that works with MS on this project i forgot the url of
it though, i could send you my patched binary if you like. it has the
following modules(compiled for slink):
Compiled-in modules:
http_core.c
mod_vhost_alias.c
mod_e
Hi Gareth,
> > > Has anyone succesfuly install the extensions on a debian box befoe?
> > > If someone has I would appreciate any help and or advice on the subject.
> > I installed it on Solaris. Can you post your error messages and
> > versions?
>
> Its frontpage 98 server extensions version3.0
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 12:07:57PM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
> Hi Gareth,
> > Has anyone succesfuly install the extensions on a debian box befoe?
> > If someone has I would appreciate any help and or advice on the subject.
> I installed it on Solaris. Can you post your error messages and
> versions?
It
Hi Gareth,
> I am trying to install the Frontpage extensions for apache
> I haven't been able to get the install script to work so I have been hacking
> it to bits.
>
> however it seems that it gets stuck on the config file and I don' know
> and can't find what exactly it is looking for/t
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 16:30:04 +1000
Corey Ralph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking into the possibility of transfering an NT/IIS based webserver
> over to apache on debian 2.1, the only thing I need to confirm is that the
> frontpage extenstions will be available and equal to the NT version
Corey Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am looking into the possibility of transfering an NT/IIS based webserver
> over to apache on debian 2.1, the only thing I need to confirm is that the
> frontpage extenstions will be available and equal to the NT versions.
>
> A couple things:
>
> I have re
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 04:30:04PM +1000, Corey Ralph wrote:
> I am looking into the possibility of transfering an NT/IIS based webserver
> over to apache on debian 2.1, the only thing I need to confirm is that the
> frontpage extenstions will be available and equal to the NT versions.
>
> A coupl
eric scroger wrote:
>
> Packy Anderson wrote:
>
> > Oliver Thuns writes:
> > > Or are there good alternatives to FP for my customers (I don't know FP
> > > and I don't need it).
> >
>
> ... much deleted
>
> >
> >
> > As for other products, I'm sure there are lots (at home, on my Mac, I
> > use
Packy Anderson wrote:
> Oliver Thuns writes:
> > Or are there good alternatives to FP for my customers (I don't know FP
> > and I don't need it).
>
... much deleted
>
>
> As for other products, I'm sure there are lots (at home, on my Mac, I
> use GoLive Cyberstudio because the Mac MS FP *sucks*)
Oliver Thuns writes:
> Or are there good alternatives to FP for my customers (I don't know FP
> and I don't need it).
Actually, you don't need FP Extensions to use FrontPage; I'm quite
happily using FrontPage for my day-job (my boss at the time _insisted_
that I use a tool of some kind, and I've g
Oliver Thuns wrote:
> Or are there good alternatives to FP for my customers (I don't know FP
> and I don't need it).
Netobjects Fusion comes to mind. I personally use Macromedia Dreamweaver, but it
requires more knowledge of HTML than the former and Frontpage. Both NOF and DW
uses normal FTP for
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Oliver Thuns wrote:
: I have some customers who asked about Frontpage Extensions.
: How could I install FP for Apache 1.3.3?
: Do I have to patch Apache or could I build a FP module?
Have a look at http://www.microsoft.com/FrontPage/wpp/SERK/a_source.h
>A while back I tried install the FrontPage 97 extensions for Linux/Apache
>and it was not a particularly successful attempt. But I'd still find this
>very useful so i'm ready to try again. Have rtr improved their support
>for Linux any? Has anyone been successful in installing it on Debian? If
>Adam, trust me, I went through this three months ago, I got involved
>in some significant discussion on rtr's forum, and the best possible
>solution, the one that rtr itself recommends, is the one I described
>above. Put the special libraries in a special place, and let apache
>know about it usin
On 9 Apr 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You are confusing ld.so with gcc. The compiler/linker doesn't search
> > /usr/local, you would need to direct it to look there. What you need to
> > put into /usr/local/lib is the shared libraries used by ld.s
On 8 Apr 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dale> On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Steffen R. Mueller wrote:
>
> Dale> One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old
> Dale> library, then copy the installed libraries, by hand, into
> Dal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 09-Apr-97 Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You are confusing ld.so with gcc. The compiler/linker doesn't search
>> /usr/local, you would need to direct it to look there. What you need to
>> put into /usr/local/lib is the
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are confusing ld.so with gcc. The compiler/linker doesn't search
> /usr/local, you would need to direct it to look there. What you need to
> put into /usr/local/lib is the shared libraries used by ld.so during
> program loading. This path is on the lis
Adam Shand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >You can download them from the rtr.com site, and then you just need to
> >add to the httpd.conf for Apache (or the equivalent on other httpds):
> I found the old debian package and got it to work by downgrading.
Yes, but you've just broken several other pa
On Wed, 9 Apr 1997, Adam Shand wrote:
> >One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old library, then
> >copy the installed libraries, by hand, into /usr/local/lib. You can then
> >upgrade back to the current libraries and everything should work without
> >the need for the LD_PRELOAD.
Hi,
>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Steffen R. Mueller wrote:
Dale> One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old
Dale> library, then copy the installed libraries, by hand, into
Dale> /usr/local/lib. You can then upgrade back to the curr
>You can download them from the rtr.com site, and then you just need to
>add to the httpd.conf for Apache (or the equivalent on other httpds):
I found the old debian package and got it to work by downgrading.
># Make sure the FrontPage stuff finds its private lib versions
>SetEnv LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old library, then
>copy the installed libraries, by hand, into /usr/local/lib. You can then
>upgrade back to the current libraries and everything should work without
>the need for the LD_PRELOAD.
I'm very new to this but couldn't you end up w
On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Steffen R. Mueller wrote:
> Thus spake Adam Shand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Hi.
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> >
> > Sorry for the follow-up post so soon after. I managed to find a copy of
> > the old libg++ 2.7.1 that I needed on the September 1996 Infomagic CD.
> >
> > For anyone in
>> For anyone interested if you want the FP97 extensions to work with Debian
>> linux all you need to do is is *downgrade* libg++ to version 2.7.1 and it
>> all becomes easy. If anyone needs help I'll be happy to provide what help
>> I can.
>
>Was it really necessary to downgrade the complete syst
Thus spake Adam Shand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi.
Hi Adam,
>
> Sorry for the follow-up post so soon after. I managed to find a copy of
> the old libg++ 2.7.1 that I needed on the September 1996 Infomagic CD.
>
> For anyone interested if you want the FP97 extensions to work with Debian
> linux
Hi.
Sorry for the follow-up post so soon after. I managed to find a copy of
the old libg++ 2.7.1 that I needed on the September 1996 Infomagic CD.
For anyone interested if you want the FP97 extensions to work with Debian
linux all you need to do is is *downgrade* libg++ to version 2.7.1 and it
a
49 matches
Mail list logo
