On Fri, 20 May 2005 21:34:11 +0200
Mirko Parthey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:13:47AM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > > The Debian kernel is already patched to include a backport of the
> > > IPsec implementation from Linux 2.6. Although I havent't tried
> > > this myself, I w
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:13:47AM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > The Debian kernel is already patched to include a backport of the
> > IPsec implementation from Linux 2.6. Although I havent't tried this
> > myself, I would expect this to be the reason why you were not able to
> > apply the freeswan pat
Jacob S wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
are people using?
I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
while applying the patches. I'm using the provided debian/rules in
On Fri, 20 May 2005 11:21:30 +0200
Mirko Parthey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:21:22PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4
> > kernel are people using?
> >
> > I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
> >
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:21:22PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
> are people using?
>
> I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
> kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
> while applying the
5 matches
Mail list logo
