Re: Framebuffer support in kernel

2001-08-23 Thread Hall Stevenson
* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010823 17:50]: > > video=matrox:vesa:443 > > I think you need to add: > > append="video=matrox:vesa:443" Okay, that worked just fine. Well, the fonts ended up a little smaller than I wanted, but I figured out a value that I liked. Now though, I'd like to know

Re: Framebuffer support in kernel

2001-08-23 Thread Hall Stevenson
> * Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (2001-08-23 14:10): > > I've compiled framebuffer support into my kernel > > using the Matrox option. If I want support for this as > > soon as LILO is done, I can't compile it as a > > module, can I ?? They don't get loaded 'til a bit later... > append="

Re: Framebuffer support in kernel

2001-08-23 Thread Rajesh Fowkar
Hall Stevenson saw fit to inform me that: >I've compiled framebuffer support into my kernel using the >Matrox option. Has anybody compiled framebuffer support on i810 ? There seems to be no support for i810 framebuffer mode. If I compile using vga framebuffer the tux on startup looks ugly :-) T

Re: Framebuffer support in kernel

2001-08-23 Thread Ben Collins
> video=matrox:vesa:443 I think you need to add: append="video=matrox:vesa:443" -- .--===-=-==-=---==-=-. / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PRO

Re: Framebuffer support in kernel

2001-08-23 Thread Sean Quinlan
* Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2001-08-23 14:10): > I've compiled framebuffer support into my kernel using the > Matrox option. If I want support for this as soon as LILO is > done, I can't compile it as a module, can I ?? They don't get > loaded 'til a bit later... > > If I compile it dire