On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 04:48:51PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> be aware that you are probably still vulnerable to at least the java
> security hole in 4.74 and previous since the java files were not
> updated (and i think that is where the bug lies)
Even though the version numbers in the nets
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 06:19:03PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> On 08/21/00 16:48:51 -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > be aware that you are probably still vulnerable to at least the java
> > security hole in 4.74 and previous since the java files were not
> > updated (and i think that is where the bug
On 08/21/00 16:48:51 -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> be aware that you are probably still vulnerable to at least the java
> security hole in 4.74 and previous since the java files were not
> updated (and i think that is where the bug lies)
>
hmm. Okay. There was a java symlink in the directory where
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 05:19:08PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> On 08/20/00 19:13:32 -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > its not the debian packages that are at fault, its fortify, fortify
> > does not and will not support netscape past 4.72. you have to do one
> > of 3 things to get 128 netscape:
> >
On 08/20/00 19:13:32 -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> its not the debian packages that are at fault, its fortify, fortify
> does not and will not support netscape past 4.72. you have to do one
> of 3 things to get 128 netscape:
>
> download the netscape tarball from netscape.com and extract the
> app
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 10:42:19PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
>
> Thanks. I went to Netscape's web site and my browser was identified as:
>
> Netscape Navigator 4.73
> English language, [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.17 i686; Nav, Strong 128-Bit
> Encryption
>
> Here it is supposedly 128-bit alre
On 08/20/00 19:13:32 -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> its not the debian packages that are at fault, its fortify, fortify
> does not and will not support netscape past 4.72. you have to do one
> of 3 things to get 128 netscape:
>
Thanks. I went to Netscape's web site and my browser was identified as
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 08:14:20PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running fortify 1.4.6-2 and netscape 4.73 that are part of potato,
> but I can't seem to get the two to dance. I figure that the netscape
> binary is navigator-smotif-473, but fortify doesn't recognize it. Am I
> attemp
8 matches
Mail list logo