Re: Fonts in XFree86/fvwm changed during update on sid

2003-03-03 Thread Cameron Matheson
Hi (scroll down), On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > * Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-03 22:23]: > > > Debconf seems to have updated /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 so that the > > order of the fontpaths is non optimal. You probably also have a > > .bak file with the

Re: Fonts in XFree86/fvwm changed during update on sid

2003-03-03 Thread Lukas Ruf
* Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-03 22:23]: > Debconf seems to have updated /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 so that the > order of the fontpaths is non optimal. You probably also have a > .bak file with the config before the change - to see what it did. > I compared the settings. They have b

Re: Fonts in XFree86/fvwm changed during update on sid

2003-03-03 Thread Alan Chandler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 03 Mar 2003 4:29 pm, Lukas Ruf wrote: > Dear all, > > last Friday, I run an update of debian sid. > > Since then, the "graphical" fonts like used in mozilla or jpilot and > xclock changed. Debconf seems to have updated /etc/X11/XF86Config-4

Re: Fonts in XFree86/fvwm changed during update on sid

2003-03-03 Thread David Z Maze
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > last Friday, I run an update of debian sid. > > Since then, the "graphical" fonts like used in mozilla or jpilot and > xclock changed. FWIW, I've noticed something similar: my laptop, having been relatively off the network for a week, spontaneously changed i