Well, I don't known, but now I'm using iceweasel for a while and now I'm not
taking unresponsable behaviour from him any more.
Maybe an upgrade would solved the issue
Thanks all people wanted to help
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Dotan Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/16 Celejar <[E
2008/5/16 Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree that not visiting youtube is generally good advice, independent
> of its deleterious effects on FF, but on those occasions that one does
> visit it, one can view the site using the browser without flash, and
> download videos with youtube-dl or clive
joseph lockhart wrote:
*/"Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Hi list,
>
Hi Javier.
> Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes
[unresponsive] during
> three or four seconds.
>
> First I experi
"Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
Hi Javier.
> Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes [unresponsive] during
> three or four seconds.
>
> First I experiment it with swiftfox, then I used Firefox (iceweasel) 2 and
On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:49:13 -0500
"Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
>
> Hi Javier.
>
> > Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes [unresponsive] during
> > three or four seconds.
...
> Do what I do: disable fl
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
ko
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
konqueror but por flash suppo
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
konqueror but por flash support).
Well I do not want t
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
> >On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
> >>FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
> >>konqueror but por flash support).
> >>
> >>Well I do not want to
On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi list,
Hi Javier.
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes [unresponsive] during
three or four seconds.
First I experiment it with swiftfox, then I used Firefox (iceweasel) 2 and
the problem didn't go out. Then I switch to icewea
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF is just a memory & cpu hog, I used to have a machine working OK with
my own optimized kernel but QT and xfce4 + FF are just eating all and I
swap like crazy... The recommendation I collected is just add few
Javier Barroso wrote:
> Somebody with the same problem ? Any workarround ?
I'm on dialup. Its normal for me to wait for iceweasel to grab a page
and display it.
Well, firefox load pages fast, but sometimes It takes various seconds
while I can't click any link / bookmark or google
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
> FF is just a memory & cpu hog, I used to have a machine working OK with
> my own optimized kernel but QT and xfce4 + FF are just eating all and I
> swap like crazy... The recommendation I collected is just add few more
> add-
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible during
three or four seconds.
I think you mean nonresponsive, but I love the comment that
firefox/iceweasel is irresponsible. Perhaps its
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Kim
>
> Please double-check that you haven't got "Tamper Data" enabled when you
> experience these irresponsible (sic, couldn't resist...) moments of
> browsing.
I disabled both, but I'm sure tamper was off when it occurs
>
>
> This extension can be pretty heavy o
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Todd A. Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
>
> > Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible
> > during three or four seconds.
>
> If you mean "unresponsive," I've often found t
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
> > Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible
> during
> > three or four seconds.
>
> I think you mean nonresponsive, but I love t
Javier Barroso wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible during
> three or four seconds.
[snip]
> I didn't install any plugin recently (only tamper data and developer
> extension installed on my iceweasel)
Please double-check that you haven't got
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible
> during three or four seconds.
If you mean "unresponsive," I've often found that firefox is
unresponsive during heavy I/O, especially disk I/O. There are settings
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible during
> three or four seconds.
I think you mean nonresponsive, but I love the comment that
firefox/iceweasel is irresponsible. Perhaps its web designers who are
ir
20 matches
Mail list logo
