Re: Firefox install

2016-04-14 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 04/14/2016 01:22 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2016-04-14, Marc Shapiro wrote: On 04/13/2016 12:04 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2016-04-13, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: Hi Marc, firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. ?? And I have install

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-14 Thread arian
> So, having installed the key, should I still be getting messages from > aptitude that firefox is untrusted? Or have I missed a step somewhere? depends on your repo setup, which is noch completely clear. You could post the output of: apt-cache policy firefox{,-esr} which shows all candidates

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-14 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 14 April 2016 09:22:59 Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-04-14, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > On 04/13/2016 12:04 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote: > >> On 2016-04-13, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: > Hi Marc, > > firefox is not in jessie-backports

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-14 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2016-04-14, Marc Shapiro wrote: > On 04/13/2016 12:04 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote: >> On 2016-04-13, Lisi Reisz wrote: >>> On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: Hi Marc, firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. >>> ?? >>> >>> And I have installed it from Jessie

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-14 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 14 April 2016 05:24:34 Marc Shapiro wrote: > On 04/13/2016 11:47 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: > >> Hi Marc, > >> > >> firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. > > > > ?? > > > > And I have installed it from Jessie backports. Also

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-13 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 04/13/2016 11:47 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: Hi Marc, firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. ?? And I have installed it from Jessie backports. Also from wheezy backports. Lisi So, having installed the key, should I still be getting

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-13 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 04/13/2016 12:04 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2016-04-13, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: Hi Marc, firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. ?? And I have installed it from Jessie backports. Also from wheezy backports. Lisi I take it you're

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-13 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2016-04-13, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. > > ?? > > And I have installed it from Jessie backports. Also from wheezy backports. > > Lisi > I take it you're using the mozilla.debian.n

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-13 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 13 April 2016 10:30:46 arian wrote: > Hi Marc, > > firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. ?? And I have installed it from Jessie backports. Also from wheezy backports. Lisi >The package which you > may find there in the future is firefox-esr, which is in testing at

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-13 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 04/13/2016 02:30 AM, arian wrote: Hi Marc, firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. The package which you may find there in the future is firefox-esr, which is in testing atm. For desktop-installations it's IMO better to just run testing or unstable if you're somewhat knowledge

Re: Firefox install

2016-04-13 Thread arian
Hi Marc, firefox is not in jessie-backports, but in unstable. The package which you may find there in the future is firefox-esr, which is in testing atm. For desktop-installations it's IMO better to just run testing or unstable if you're somewhat knowledgeable. You know, they say there are thre

Re: Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-30 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:48:14 -0400, Carlos Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I know what backports that I need? I went to apt-get.org and > typed in firefox. I got some hits, but I did not see the version of > Firefox that I downloaded (firefox-1). Will they work anyway? Does it > matt

Re: Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-30 Thread Carlos Taylor
How do I know what backports that I need? I went to apt-get.org and typed in firefox. I got some hits, but I did not see the version of Firefox that I downloaded (firefox-1). Will they work anyway? Does it matter that I have Firefox-1? Also, how do I install the backports? Thanks everyone...

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:33:15 +0200, Agustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:20:13 +0200, Andrea Vettorello wrote: > > > I doubt firefox from firefox.org will run on Woody (different glibc, > > gtk2..), anyway i will start running "firefox-installer", something > > like "sh fire

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:05:29 -0500, Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:42:44 +0200 > Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:33:54 +0200, Joost Witteveen > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:12 -0500

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Jacob S
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:42:44 +0200 Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:33:54 +0200, Joost Witteveen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:12 -0500, Jacob S > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>As root, run firefox-installer. This

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Agustin
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:20:13 +0200, Andrea Vettorello wrote: > I doubt firefox from firefox.org will run on Woody (different glibc, > gtk2..), anyway i will start running "firefox-installer", something > like "sh firefox-installer" or chmod it +x and the running it... > > > Andrea > > P.S. you

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Joost Witteveen
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:12 -0500, Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As root, run firefox-installer. This will be easiest if you are logged into X as root. IMNSHO this is not wise, doing this will only create havoc behind the back of your package manager (dpkg), the only place you can safely i

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:33:54 +0200, Joost Witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:12 -0500, Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>As root, run firefox-installer. This will be easiest if you are logged > >>into X as root. > >> > > > > > > IMNSHO this is not wise, do

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:12 -0500, Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:51:05 -0400 (EDT) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > What do I do from here? > > > > 1. Downloaded firefox. > > > > 2. tar zxvf firefox-1.0PR-i686-linux-gtk2+xft-installer.tar.gz > > > > My directory has

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Jacob S
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:51:05 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What do I do from here? > > 1. Downloaded firefox. > > 2. tar zxvf firefox-1.0PR-i686-linux-gtk2+xft-installer.tar.gz > > My directory has the following files/dirs in it: > config.ini > firefox-installer > firefox-installer.bin

Re: Firefox Install

2004-09-29 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:51:05 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do I do from here? > > 1. Downloaded firefox. > > 2. tar zxvf firefox-1.0PR-i686-linux-gtk2+xft-installer.tar.gz > > My directory has the following files/dirs in it: > config.ini > firefox-installer > f