On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Will Trillich wrote:
whether *fsck works or not is a separate issue
but critcal issue if your data is critical
> ext2fs (ext3fs)
sucky e2fsck
> xfs
xfs_check
> jfs
jfs_fsck
add reiserfsck and for guess which fs type
> nfs
not a filesystem
c ya
alvin
--
To UNSUBSC
On Mon, Aug 16 at 02:43PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:47:10AM -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
> > - is there significant reason to shun reiserfs?
> > - what's the optimal/recommended recovery method?
>
> Best reason to shun it is that when the filesystem inevitably
> goes ba
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:47:10AM -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
> - is there significant reason to shun reiserfs?
> - what's the optimal/recommended recovery method?
Not from me, huh? Best reason to shun it is that when the filesystem
inevitably goes bad (*all* do, not just reiser), the recovery t
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Will Trillich wrote:
> i'd still love to see an informed answer (i.e. not from marc
> wilson) on why reiserfs should be avoided. the instance
> discussed here may not have been recovered using the best means,
> i don't know. but blanket assertions (avoid it) and emotional
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
