In my experience, you will likely be able to pull a few more weeks / months
of life out of the drive but it will die.
Mirko's suggestion of migrating to a n=3 raid1 setup is also what I would
recommend.
You will notice in your smartctl output that Reallocated_Sector_Ct is 41.
That means that the
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:17:03PM +0100, Mirko Parthey wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 08:38:27PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> > On 03/05/2017 01:02 PM, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > >I have a disk that is reporting SMART errors. It is an active disk in
> > >a (kernel, not hardware) RAID1 confi
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 08:38:27PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/05/2017 01:02 PM, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> >I have a disk that is reporting SMART errors.
What are the errors? Some are more serious, some less so.
> >It is an active disk in a (kernel, not hardware) RAID1
> >confi
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 08:38:27PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/05/2017 01:02 PM, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> >I have a disk that is reporting SMART errors. It is an active disk in a
> >(kernel, not hardware) RAID1 configuration. I also have a hot spare in the
> >RAID1, and md hasn't decide
On 03/05/2017 01:02 PM, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I have a disk that is reporting SMART errors. It is an active disk in a
(kernel, not hardware) RAID1 configuration. I also have a hot spare in the
RAID1, and md hasn't decided it should fail the disk and switch to the hot
spare. Should I proactively
On 2017-03-05 at 16:02, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> I have a disk that is reporting SMART errors. It is an active disk in
> a (kernel, not hardware) RAID1 configuration. I also have a hot spare
> in the RAID1, and md hasn't decided it should fail the disk and
> switch to the hot spare. Should I proac
6 matches
Mail list logo
