Re: FYI: Branden's Response to DPL Platform Question

2004-02-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:11:27PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Joel Konkle-Parker: > > challenges they've had to face. The fact that approximately 6% of our > > archive fails to meet bare minimum expectations leads me to believe that > > we may want to inaugurate a special process for

Re: FYI: Branden's Response to DPL Platform Question

2004-02-29 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka: > On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 22:11, s. keeling wrote: > > That might be a great way to draw in potential maintainers (hey, I'd > > read it!), and with %96 good vs. %6 bad, the numbers are promising. > > ^^^ > You mean from at leas

Re: FYI: Branden's Response to DPL Platform Question

2004-02-29 Thread Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 22:11, s. keeling wrote: --snip -- > That might be a great way to draw in potential maintainers (hey, I'd > read it!), and with %96 good vs. %6 bad, the numbers are promising. > ^^^ You mean from at least 102 % of Debian packages? -:)) Vlada

Re: FYI: Branden's Response to DPL Platform Question

2004-02-29 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Joel Konkle-Parker: > > challenges they've had to face. The fact that approximately 6% of our > archive fails to meet bare minimum expectations leads me to believe that > we may want to inaugurate a special process for orphaning such packages. 'Sounds to me like a job for [EMAIL PR