Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hey, I do not know who invented L and R. That is really problem in
> modern world. They sound same to me :) Problem is that English is a
> lingua-franca of computer world and I do not speak/spell well.
> ("frustrated")
Your english is excellent, I've seen far funnier mistake
Hi Simon from UK,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 03:07:05AM +0100, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > To avoid this kind of flustration, dselect is better tool. With that we
> > can see and confirm package names. This is true for kernel-image since
> > it evolve really fast with strange co
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> To avoid this kind of flustration, dselect is better tool. With that we
> can see and confirm package names. This is true for kernel-image since
> it evolve really fast with strange combination of name mutation.
>
> Just my thought. (I like apt-get though)
flustration ? I'v
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:11:11PM -0700, curtis wrote:
> Let's go back to my original problem.
I see question was answered. Good. :)
To avoid this kind of flustration, dselect is better tool. With that we
can see and confirm package names. This is true for kernel-image since
it evolve really
curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apt-get install kernel-imgage-
> In this case, when I type apt-get install kernal-image-2.4.17-386 (the
> kernel version on my other computers), I get the following message:
>Package kernel-image-2.4.17-386 has no available version, but exists
>in the
It seems that it must have been removed from the archive between your
installs. 2.4.17 does not exist on the archives now, only
2.4.17-b42.4. I may be wrong but it seems to me it hasn't been there
for several weeks. I would suggest installing 2.4.18.
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 19:11, curtis wrote:
>
Let's go back to my original problem.
Here's my letter:
I upgraded the kernels on all of computers per instructions, which
are provided at the end of the message.
This worked on all but one computer.
I assumed that that computer was upgraded to 2.4, but I discovered
recently that
Hi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:11:50PM -0500, dman wrote:
> Will anyone help curtis? I don't know about the 'bf' kernels.
bf = boot floppy
Special kernel flavor compiled for the initial system installation.
It should be quite useful but may not have all the bells and whistle.
Just install norma
8 matches
Mail list logo
