Re: FAQ-O-Matic (was: Re: join us!)

2000-09-01 Thread Joey Hess
John Hasler wrote: > Paul D. Smith writes: > > For the second, it's fine for me for small editing jobs; > > I find it frustrating for anything. > > > I do the work in my editor and paste the results into the window. > > I hadn't tried that. I'd rather just download the file, edit it, and then >

Re: FAQ-O-Matic (was: Re: join us!)

2000-09-01 Thread John Hasler
Paul D. Smith writes: > For the second, it's fine for me for small editing jobs; I find it frustrating for anything. > I do the work in my editor and paste the results into the window. I hadn't tried that. I'd rather just download the file, edit it, and then upload it. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PR

Re: FAQ-O-MATIC (was Re: Linux Tips & Tricks)

1998-11-26 Thread Alexander Kushnirenko
Hi! I totally agree with Mark on this subject. The whole idea of FAQ-O-MATIC is great, and once it showed up I thought it would quickly develop. In my PERSONAL opinion it did not quite reach it's goals. 1. I agree with Mike - put it on the main page. 2. It's quite complicated. I tried on

Re: FAQ-o-MATIC

1998-08-19 Thread M.C. Vernon
> [this is cross posted to the user list, as I want to get some of our kind > users to help with the FAQ-O-MATIC. The idea is that it is "their" FAQ. > Please snip the CC list as appropriate] (and so some of us get it twice? :) ) > I think we should get the users to use the fom. it is their FAQ

Re: FAQ-o-MATIC

1998-08-18 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
[this is cross posted to the user list, as I want to get some of our kind users to help with the FAQ-O-MATIC. The idea is that it is "their" FAQ. Please snip the CC list as appropriate] Hello, On Tue, Aug 18, 1998 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Jens Ritter wrote: > > As you might have noticed, today I po