Katie Ralston wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Any plans in owning Users, partners, re-sellers, competitors and agents
> using Oracle Fusion?
>
>
>
> Track your business on the go with our business list option, we store
> everything with high quality Information, target approach, fueling
> Yes it is possible for dpkg, apt and aptitude. The description is in
> the Debian FAQ:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html#s-puttingonhold
>
> HTH
> -- David
Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
At Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:18:27 + (UTC),
Huub wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On RedHat/Fedora, I can exclude packages from being updated like this:
> "yum --exclude -y upgrade".
> Can someone please tell me (or provide a link to it) if this is also
> possible with apt-get. Reading the apt-get manpage, I didn
On Saturday 13 February 2010 09:18:27 Huub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On RedHat/Fedora, I can exclude packages from being updated like this:
> "yum --exclude -y upgrade".
> Can someone please tell me (or provide a link to it) if this is also
> possible with apt-get. Reading the apt-get manpage, I didn't fi
Cem Kamil Külekçi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've patched postfix with quota and installed. But whenever I try to
> upgrade other programs apt-get wants to upgrade postfix too. I want to
> exclude postfix from upgrade, I've tried apt pin preferences but
> couldn't make it. Anyone have a sample config?
>
>
Cem Kamil Külekçi a écrit :
Hi,
I've patched postfix with quota and installed. But whenever I try to
upgrade other programs apt-get wants to upgrade postfix too. I want to
exclude postfix from upgrade, I've tried apt pin preferences but
couldn't make it. Anyone have a sample config?
thanks
Cem
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:25:40AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> > I can't say whether anything has changed at any point; but, I think you
> > want to use something like the following:
> >
> > cd / && tar Sczvf /syjet/debmain.tgz --exclude tmp --exclude proc
> > --exclude syjet
>
>
> Whoops, I f
> May I ask why the behavior of the --exclude command has changed? Can
> someone suggest a remedy for my situation?
Yes, --exclude has changed indeed (between slink and potato), see
/usr/share/doc/tar/NEWS.gz:
version 1.13.6 - Paul Eggert, 1999-08-11.
* An --exclude pattern containing / now ex
8 matches
Mail list logo