On Vi, 11 mai 12, 07:51:16, Indulekha wrote:
> Gmail does have some issues (many of
> which are mitigated by using mutt and accessing via imap), but spam
> is one thing they handle very nicely.
Mostly agree with you, but do check the spam folder, I've seen false
positives more than once.
Kind re
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:51:16AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:34:41AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> > You are obviously confused about a misconfiguration and *actual* spam.
> >
>
> Actually spam is simply unsolicited, unwanted email. It really doesn't
> matter whet
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:34:41AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> You are obviously confused about a misconfiguration and *actual* spam.
>
Actually spam is simply unsolicited, unwanted email. It really doesn't
matter whether the cause is some twit trying to make his fortune off
herbal viagra
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:35:33PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 01:06 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Dunno, did you see that:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg00705.html
>
> Sent to you personally, because you send mails to the list and the list
> forward
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:41:06PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> This is one more mail I (OOPS) DID NOT wanted to write.
>
> Spam, is spam, is spam. Your and my mail at this moment are spam too.
>
> Nobody else, but we send spam at the moment.
Spam is unsolicited bulk email. It is precisely defin
On Thu, 10 May 2012 01:06:27 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:16:29PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>> 09.05.2012 12:42, no-re...@evernote.com kirjoitti:
>>
>> Why Evernote is spamming this list?
>
> Dunno, did you see that:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/0
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 14:35:33 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 01:06 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Dunno, did you see that:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg00705.html
>
> Sent to you personally, because you send mails to the list and the list
> forwarded them t
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 01:12 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:33:25PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Spam happens, discussions about junk mail are useless, as long as they
> > are that rare, as they are at the moment.
>
> This isn't spam. It's more likely a misconfiguratio
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 01:06 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Dunno, did you see that:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg00705.html
Sent to you personally, because you send mails to the list and the list
forwarded them to the users with your name as sender.
I suspect we all got this
09.05.2012 16:06, Chris Bannister kirjoitti:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:16:29PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>> 09.05.2012 12:42, no-re...@evernote.com kirjoitti:
>>
>> Why Evernote is spamming this list?
>
> Dunno, did you see that:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg00705.html
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:33:25PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Spam happens, discussions about junk mail are useless, as long as they
> are that rare, as they are at the moment.
This isn't spam. It's more likely a misconfiguration somewhere.
--
"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common pe
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:16:29PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 09.05.2012 12:42, no-re...@evernote.com kirjoitti:
>
> Why Evernote is spamming this list?
Dunno, did you see that:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg00705.html
Which seemed to have triggered this:
Date: Wed, 9 Ma
Lisi writes:
> Who is it that is landing us with these?
I don't know, but an automated message went to me from
whatever this is responding to a message I sent to the list
yesterday and I suspect it is somebody's mailer that is on the
fritz. It could be a full mailbox which was mentioned in
:58:33
To:
Subject: Re: Evernote message: Emailed note was not submitted
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 11:44:09 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > Why Evernote is spamming this list?
>
> Not Evernote spamming. They're just allowing their service to be used
> for spamming.
I thought
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 11:44:09 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > Why Evernote is spamming this list?
>
> Not Evernote spamming. They're just allowing their service to be used
> for spamming.
I thought that it was like an autoresponder, and a setting needed to be
changed. :-( Sorry everyone. It is a
On 09/05/12 20:16, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 09.05.2012 12:42, no-re...@evernote.com kirjoitti:
>>
>>
>> Evernote was unable to submit your note for the following reason:
>> The storage limit for this account has been reached.
>> [Cannot email more than 50 notes to Evernote account per day]
>>
>> O
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 11:23 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> Who is it that is landing us with these?
> Lisi
My first and last mail regarding to this issue.
Spam happens, discussions about junk mail are useless, as long as they
are that rare, as they are at the moment.
I'm subscribed to tons of mailing list
09.05.2012 13:23, Lisi kirjoitti:
> Who is it that is landing us with these?
> Lisi
>
>
> Evernote message: Emailed note was not submitted
> From:
> no-re...@evernote.com
> To:
> lisi.re...@gmail.com
> Date:
> Today 06
09.05.2012 12:42, no-re...@evernote.com kirjoitti:
>
>
> Evernote was unable to submit your note for the following reason:
> The storage limit for this account has been reached.
> [Cannot email more than 50 notes to Evernote account per day]
>
> Original message information:
> From: Clive Standb
19 matches
Mail list logo
