On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 07:09:10PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 14/09/14 23:40, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
< snip >
> >Is this a known bug? With Chrome? With Flash?
> >
>
> See https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=410805
>
> The suggested place to get a replacement is here
>
On 14/09/14 23:40, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
[ Debian stable ]
A few days ago, I updated Chrome from:
google-chrome-stable:amd64 37.0.2062.94-1
to:
google-chrome-stable:amd64 37.0.2062.120-1
That update caused pages with embedded Adobe Flash to malfunction (with
various nasty error wi
sven> Downgrade to the latest working version.
Luckily, I was able to find a couple of earlier Chrome versions in
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in order to downgrade. What if I'd removed all
the archived 'apt' files to save space? This leads to the following
question ...
Is there a known Google si
>> So instead, I removed the "120" version, and reinstalled "94".
>> Flash returned to normal!
Just as you suggest later ...
>> Is this a known bug? With Chrome? With Flash?
sven> This is known. For some unknown reasons Google decided to link their
sven> libpepflash.so with glibc-2.1
Kenneth Jacker wrote:
> [ Debian stable ]
> A few days ago, I updated Chrome from:
>google-chrome-stable:amd64 37.0.2062.94-1
> to:
>google-chrome-stable:amd64 37.0.2062.120-1
> That update caused pages with embedded Adobe Flash to malfunction (with
> various nasty error windows appea
5 matches
Mail list logo