On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 18:52 -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Did your research indicate that SANE supports the V100?
>
> No. The list of supported devices listed at www.sane-project.org does
> not include the V100 but I hoped it would be supported as most Epson
> scanners use the same backend.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 05:24:03PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/17/07 17:03, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:36:39PM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote:
> >> On Sat February 17 2007 13:32, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >>> I just pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/07 17:03, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:36:39PM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote:
>> On Sat February 17 2007 13:32, Thomas H. George wrote:
>>> I just purchased an Epson V100 Photo Scanner but apparently the sane
>>> epson backe
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:36:39PM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Sat February 17 2007 13:32, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > I just purchased an Epson V100 Photo Scanner but apparently the sane
> > epson backend does not support this model. As root scanimage -L finds
> > the scanner but the test scan
On Sat February 17 2007 13:32, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I just purchased an Epson V100 Photo Scanner but apparently the sane
> epson backend does not support this model. As root scanimage -L finds
> the scanner but the test scanimage >image.pnm suggested in the sane man
> page results in scanimag
5 matches
Mail list logo