Re: eql = tun + eth0

2002-01-16 Thread crispin
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 03:34:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Have a look at ... for more information > Sorry :) Forgot to paste in URL's http://qos.ittc.ukans.edu/ http://www.qosforum.com/docs/faq/ http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/linux/qos_tc/ http://qos.ittc.ukans.edu/howto/ http:

Re: eql = tun + eth0

2002-01-16 Thread crispin
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:45:24PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In TCP/IP we only have control of our outgoing traffic. Thus your > > connections will be set up via one or the other. Say your wireless > > device is 128k and your modem is 56k. With this sor

Re: eql = tun + eth0

2002-01-15 Thread Oki DZ
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In TCP/IP we only have control of our outgoing traffic. Thus your > connections will be set up via one or the other. Say your wireless > device is 128k and your modem is 56k. With this sort of primative > balancing you initiate a download. It comes dow

Re: eql = tun + eth0

2002-01-15 Thread crispin
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:58:32AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Recently I gave eql a try to spread load across two links that I > > controlled both ends of. I had lots of problems and I believe eql has > > not been actively maintained in the kernel for a

Re: eql = tun + eth0

2002-01-15 Thread Oki DZ
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Recently I gave eql a try to spread load across two links that I > controlled both ends of. I had lots of problems and I believe eql has > not been actively maintained in the kernel for a long time. The > enslaving of links works for outbound, but not

Re: eql = tun + eth0

2002-01-15 Thread crispin
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:18:56PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to bind /dev/tunl0 and /dev/eth0 under eql? I mean, > I'd like to have more bandwidth out from both devices. > The packets will traverse two different default routes, I guess. > Recently I gave eql a try to s

Re: eql

1999-11-06 Thread Lindsay Allen
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, steve j . kondik wrote: > i've been trying to get eql working on a potato box without much luck. > the two ppp links come up fine (and i've set nodefaultroute in the options), > i do and ifconfig eql up ip, eql_enslave eql pppx 57600 for each of the > links, then route add defa

Re: EQL question

1999-03-11 Thread servis
*- On 10 Mar, Craig T. Hancock wrote about "Re: EQL question" > I ma just curious what is EQL > EQL Driver: Serial IP Load Balancing HOWTO Simon "Guru Aleph-Null" Janes, [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.1, February 27, 1995 This is the manual for the EQL device driver

Re: EQL question

1999-03-11 Thread Craig T. Hancock
I ma just curious what is EQL "Froilan C. Mendoza" wrote: > Hello! > > Would like to ask if it's possible to have two or more EQL connections to > a server? .. we have one existing EQL connection to our server (using two > modems) and we are intending to put up a couple of connections using EQL.

Re: EQL - all traffic is via ppp1

1998-01-08 Thread Neilen Marais
>Now, if I go to dual modems (or even three), is the box going to be >able >to keep up when servicing three 33K modems and doing DNS lookups and >running apache, squid, etc all at the same time? Oh yeah, it will certianly keep up. A local ISP used to run their whole ISP on a 486dx4/100, with 32mb,

Re: EQL - all traffic is via ppp1

1998-01-05 Thread Lindsay Allen
Hi Kevin, I worked it out yesterday. My mistake was in not deleting the pppx entries from the routing table. Perfectly obvious in hindsight, but I do wish that people writing documents would give more examples. The closest I have come to a Portmaster is looking one up in the price list on Sat

Re: EQL - all traffic is via ppp1

1998-01-04 Thread Kevin Traas
>> > I have a fairly urgent need for load balancing two modems, but eql just >> > does not work for me. All the bits are in place but all traffic goes via >> > ppp1. >> > >> You must make sure that the hardware at the other end of the connection >> will also support load balancing (i.e. it must be

Re: EQL - all traffic is via ppp1

1998-01-01 Thread Lindsay Allen
On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, George Bonser wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Lindsay Allen wrote: > > > > > I have a fairly urgent need for load balancing two modems, but eql just > > does not work for me. All the bits are in place but all traffic goes via > > ppp1. > > > > There are quite a few steps in

Re: EQL - all traffic is via ppp1

1998-01-01 Thread Lindsay Allen
> > Is there a HOWTO or similar? I have /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.eql > > and I got hold of eql-1.2.tar.gz which has the source for eql_enslave. > > It's in the NET-3 Howto. > > 6.6. EQL - multiple line traffic equaliser Thanks - I missed that. But I don't think the writer has act

Re: EQL - all traffic is via ppp1

1998-01-01 Thread Dale Harrison
> Is there a HOWTO or similar? I have /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.eql > and I got hold of eql-1.2.tar.gz which has the source for eql_enslave. It's in the NET-3 Howto. 6.6. EQL - multiple line traffic equaliser > The application is for a school which needs 64K bandwidth but ISDN is too

Re: EQL

1997-04-22 Thread Brian K Servis
Steve Hsieh writes: > > >Who has EQL running on their system? To those that do -- do you still >have to run eql_enslave as written in the eql readme file in the kernel? >The info and web sites listed there are out of date. > The short answer: yes Brian -- Mechanical Engineering