Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-12-14 Thread nate
Andy said: > People have mentioned in this thread to just go get some old 486 and > Pentium boxes and make them be dumb terminals. No. I really don't want > to be messing around with old boxes. I want something FAST like this unit your going to pay a large premium for such a product. An examp

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-12-14 Thread John Griffiths
>No. I really don't want to be messing >around with old boxes. I want something FAST like this unit so you can just >press the reset button (if anything goes wrong) and get going again. >Boots in about 5 seconds. > http://newsforge.com/newsforge/02/12/04/2346215.shtml?tid=19 sounds exactly like

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-12-14 Thread Andy
> > > > Thin client technologyisn't that what you are talking about? > > > > > > > > I have always wondered.why can't Linux (especially Debian > > > > Linux) do the same thing Citrix is doing? > > > > > > Citrix essentially does what X does a lot less efficiently. X is > > > prett

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Tom Cook
On 0, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Thin client boxes are attractive since one does not have to deal with > old hardware, failing memory, flaky video cards, hard drives, etc > > I want to build a Debian server and be able to serve 50-100 thin clients over > a 100Mbps LAN. I can b

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Tom Cook
On 0, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Metaframe still requires a local CPU to handle display stuff. You > > can't route VGA signals over ATM. > > I did not mean Asynchronous Transfer Mode.. > (not sure if you meant that either...just trying to being clear) > I meant that it was like an A

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Kourosh
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:04:37AM -0800, Andy wrote: > On Monday 21 October 2002 22:36, Tom Cook wrote: > > Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thin client technologyisn't that what you are talking about? > > > > > > I have always wondered.why can't Linux (especially Debian > > >

RE: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Ross Dawson
all guide. Read the into and see if it whet's your appetite. Also google on Linux Kiosk. Xterminal HOWTO etc. HTH Ross -Original Message- From: Andy [mailto:list@;firman.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dumb terminals possible with i

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Russell
Andy wrote: > > I want to build a Debian server and be able to serve 50-100 thin clients over > a 100Mbps LAN. I can build the server but I am at a loss on how to get a > thin client running this way. http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Thinclient-HOWTO.html http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Diskless-root-NFS-HO

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Russell
Andy wrote: > > On Monday 21 October 2002 22:36, Tom Cook wrote: > > Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thin client technologyisn't that what you are talking about? > > > > > > I have always wondered.why can't Linux (especially Debian > > > Linux) do the same thing Citrix is doi

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Andy
On Monday 21 October 2002 22:36, Tom Cook wrote: > Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thin client technologyisn't that what you are talking about? > > > > I have always wondered.why can't Linux (especially Debian > > Linux) do the same thing Citrix is doing? > > Citrix essentially

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-22 Thread Kent West
Andy wrote: Suppose I wanted to set up some kiosks for web browsing, solitaire, etc (just generic users). I can envision three scenarios: Thin client technologyisn't that what you are talking about? No, thin client is easy stuff. What I'm talking about is multiple dumb (but

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-21 Thread Andy
> Metaframe still requires a local CPU to handle display stuff. You > can't route VGA signals over ATM. I did not mean Asynchronous Transfer Mode.. (not sure if you meant that either...just trying to being clear) I meant that it was like an ATM card that you stick into this little box that h

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-21 Thread Tom Cook
On 0, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Suppose I wanted to set up some kiosks for web browsing, solitaire, > > >> etc (just generic users). I can envision three scenarios: > > You knownot too long ago a friend of mine (Windows SysAdmin) > showed me a really cool setup. He had Windows 2

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-21 Thread Andy
> >> Suppose I wanted to set up some kiosks for web browsing, solitaire, > >> etc (just generic users). I can envision three scenarios: You knownot too long ago a friend of mine (Windows SysAdmin) showed me a really cool setup. He had Windows 2000 Server in one town and in another town he had

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-21 Thread Donald R. Spoon
Kent West wrote: Try KDE wrote: Kent West wrote: Suppose I wanted to set up some kiosks for web browsing, solitaire, etc (just generic users). I can envision three scenarios: 3) one server and the rest of the workstations are dumb terminals, having keyboard, mouse, and monitor connected t

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-21 Thread Kent West
Try KDE wrote: Kent West wrote: Suppose I wanted to set up some kiosks for web browsing, solitaire, etc (just generic users). I can envision three scenarios: 3) one server and the rest of the workstations are dumb terminals, having keyboard, mouse, and monitor connected to the server via

Re: Dumb terminals possible with i386 Debian

2002-10-21 Thread Try KDE
Kent West wrote: Suppose I wanted to set up some kiosks for web browsing, solitaire, etc (just generic users). I can envision three scenarios: 1) full-blown workstations, each one with their own hard drives and OS setup, etc. 2) one server and the rest of the workstations are thin clients,

Re: Dumb Terminals Was: Unidentified subject!

1998-07-31 Thread Paul
It should be fairly trivial to set up some terminals up to serial ports. What kind of terminals do you have in mind? This would require a serial port for each terminal and changes in /etc/inittab. On Thu, 30 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Has anyone or does anyone know how to, set up dumb

Re: Dumb Terminals

1998-07-31 Thread Bill Bell
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Dumb Terminals >Date: 30 Jul 1998 21:58:33 +0200 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have some old computers th

Re: Dumb Terminals

1998-07-30 Thread debian-user
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have some old computers that I would like to use as dumb terminals. I > was wondering if someone could point me to a good howto or faq on how to > set this up or perhaps give me some tips and or help. Among a zillion other things t

Re: Dumb Terminals

1998-07-30 Thread keatingjp17
I read the document on dumb terminals for X but what if i just want them to sit with getty login instead of being dumb X terminals? Any chance anyone knows a good doc on that? "If I had known this before I"

Re: Dumb Terminals

1998-07-30 Thread E. S. Venkatraman
If you want to set them up a X-terms you can look at: http://www.menet.umn.edu/~kaszeta/unix/xterminal/index.htm Venkat On Thu, 30 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have some old computers that I would like to use as dumb terminals. I > was wondering if someone could point me to a good