Sorry in advance.
Not a 'pure' Debian solution BUT one bsed on Debian. ClusterKnoppix will
auto sense multi-processors.
http://bofh.be/clusterknoppix/
RbtBotL
Craig - ><>
oBU SysAdmin
/|\ 607 777 6827
^ Tot Ziens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
--- "Andrew M.A. Cater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:48:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've installed sarge from DVD onto a dual pentium 3 machine. How
> can I
> > tell whether debian has detected both processors? Or can I just
> assume it
> > will have?
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:48:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've installed sarge from DVD onto a dual pentium 3 machine. How can I
> tell whether debian has detected both processors? Or can I just assume it
> will have?
>
If you have the framebuffer at login - you should see two peng
How about
more /proc/cpuinfo
- Original Message -
From: "k l u r t" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: Dual processor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've installed sarge from DVD onto a dual pentium 3 machine. How can
I tell whether debian has detected both processors? Or can I just
assume it will have?
hi,
have you tried dmesg... what does it say?
k l u r t
pgpH2PYgzmRFq.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Sig
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:48:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've installed sarge from DVD onto a dual pentium 3 machine. How can I tell
> whether debian has detected both processors? Or can I just assume it will
> have?
>
Don't assume. You know what they say :-)
By default, Debian
| Can someone point me to a website that covers advantages/disadvantages
| of a dual processor machine over a single processor machine, especially in
| linux?
http://2cpu.com http://www.linux.org.uk/SMP/title.html
Try a google search for smp and linux...
HTH,
Brooks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001, Jérôme-Georges-Michel BENOIT wrote:
> Thanks you very much for your advice.
>
> > do you have a real smp kernel installed?
>
> Good question ;-)
>
> I guess that I have installed Debian
> in the basic way:
> 1] how can I check this point ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep SMP /b
> "Jérôme-Georges-Michel" == Jérôme-Georges-Michel BENOIT <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> writes:
Jérôme-Georges-Michel> Thanks you very much for your advice.
>> do you have a real smp kernel installed?
Jérôme-Georges-Michel> Good question ;-)
Jérôme-Georges-Michel> I guess that I
Thanks you very much for your advice.
> do you have a real smp kernel installed?
Good question ;-)
I guess that I have installed Debian
in the basic way:
1] how can I check this point ?
2] may I configure some files ?
3] may I build a new kernel ?
Thanks,
Jerome BENOIT
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 06:11:00AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
| dman wrote:
| > On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 05:15:14AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
| > | Bonjour:
| > | Futhermore, I have created a swap file four times greater
| > | than the RAM of the machine (1Gb):
| > | my actual swap (checked with
> I have just install the Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (testing/unstable)
> on a dual processor machine
> --I installed Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 on my laptop a few months ago.
> To have a nice login I have installed the `linuxlogo' package:
> according to the printed message, only one processor is identified.
dman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 05:15:14AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> | Bonjour:
> |
> | I have just install the Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (testing/unstable)
> | on a dual processor machine
> | --I installed Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 on my laptop a few months ago.
> | To have a nice login I hav
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 05:15:14AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
| Bonjour:
|
| I have just install the Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (testing/unstable)
| on a dual processor machine
| --I installed Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 on my laptop a few months ago.
| To have a nice login I have installed the `linuxlogo' pa
* Jerome BENOIT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> Bonjour:
>
> How can we check that the two processor are detected ?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
you should have one set of entries for each processor.
--
) ,_),_)
(-(__ |_ _ _ |/
) | |(_)(_ |\
( \_,
Thanks for all the replies. They have been most helpful. It seems as
though SCSI is definitely the way to go for this large database server.
Essentially it will be the server for a database with the 486 / slow
pentiums retrieving and writing small amounts of data continuously. So
definitely sold
Hi,
> Vector wrote:
> > For multiprocessor support, intel is not as horrid as you proclaim it
to
> > be. No question, AMD rocks. But there are not many (any at all?) dual
> > cpu boards out there and the support for more than one processor with
AMD
> > is still quite immature. For mid-range an
Dunno about expert, but I have some experience in this area. The P4,
having a long pipeline, is more suited to streaming type processing: the
pipeline has to be 'full' before it'll give peak performance. I think
that most of the s/w that supports the new clever bits in the P4 are
benchmarking pac
Sweet! I'll check it out and let you know what it's like... I was once a
big fan of Tyan boards but had to get away from them for a while because
they weren't releasing boards that were meeting my needs. Thanks for the
heads up!
vector
> Tyan has released a dual Athlon motherboard. According
Vector wrote:
> For multiprocessor support, intel is not as horrid as you proclaim it to
> be. No question, AMD rocks. But there are not many (any at all?) dual
> cpu boards out there and the support for more than one processor with AMD
> is still quite immature. For mid-range and up servers, mu
For multiprocessor support, intel is not as horrid as you proclaim it to
be. No question, AMD rocks. But there are not many (any at all?) dual
cpu boards out there and the support for more than one processor with AMD
is still quite immature. For mid-range and up servers, multiple CPU's can
be a
personally i would always stick to intel, especially in a server
environment, and in your situation i would go for the dual p3 soloution
-Original Message-
From: John
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian-user
Sent: 20/06/01 18:29
Subject: Re: Dual processor PIII 866 versus single Pentium 1.4Ghz
Ill tell you right now. DONT GET INTEL CPUS. they are horrid now-a-days. AMD
chips are based off of newer architecture, have 33% more on-chip chache, and
can run at even 266mhz system bus, as opposed to only 133mhz p3. Athlons also
have 3 Floating point pipelines, as opposed to p3's 1.
all of t
23 matches
Mail list logo
