Damon Muller wrote:
>
> G'day,
>
> > Possible error sources are :
> > -the partition was never made a vfat partition by
> > Windows95, but is still a fat partition
>
> Sort of don't think this would be it, as it had files with long file
> names in it. I don't think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 02 Jun 1998, Damon Muller wrote:
>G'day,
>
>> Possible error sources are :
>> -the partition was never made a vfat partition by
>>Windows95, but is still a fat partition
>
>Sort of don't think this would be it, as it had files
G'day,
> Possible error sources are :
> -the partition was never made a vfat partition by
> Windows95, but is still a fat partition
Sort of don't think this would be it, as it had files with long file
names in it. I don't think that is possible under FAT.
>
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Damon Muller wrote:
: Hi Folks,
:
: Just got around to installing Bo on my old Pentium 150, and it's pretty
: much working (give or take a few minor issues...)
:
: One thing has got me a little cofused, and maybe it's me doing something
: wrong (prolly is)... I have a 1.2G dr
On Mon, 01 Jun 1998, Damon Muller wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>Just got around to installing Bo on my old Pentium 150, and it's pretty
>much working (give or take a few minor issues...)
>
>One thing has got me a little cofused, and maybe it's me doing something
>wrong (prolly is)... I have a 1.2G drive in
5 matches
Mail list logo
