On 04/12/2011 03:32 PM, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:03:36 -0400
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Apologies for following up to myself, but I thought I should say that
when I added /run myself the 2.6.38 kernel booted without problems.
So... is this udev167-1 safe to upgrade to on Wheezy
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:03:36 -0400
Johan Kullstam wrote:
>>>Apologies for following up to myself, but I thought I should say that
>>>when I added /run myself the 2.6.38 kernel booted without problems.
>>
>> So... is this udev167-1 safe to upgrade to on Wheezy (base-files 6.1), or
>> should I w
Andrej Kacian writes:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:44:17 +0100
> Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
>>On 08 Apr 2011, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>>>
>>> After an upgrade today to base-files 6.3 I rashly assume things would be
>>> fixed, but not so. My /run is no longer there but now the 2.6.38 kernels
>>> won't
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:44:17 +0100
Anthony Campbell wrote:
>On 08 Apr 2011, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>>
>> After an upgrade today to base-files 6.3 I rashly assume things would be
>> fixed, but not so. My /run is no longer there but now the 2.6.38 kernels
>> won't boot - they stop at the nouveau d
On 08 Apr 2011, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> After an upgrade today to base-files 6.3 I rashly assume things would be
> fixed, but not so. My /run is no longer there but now the 2.6.38 kernels
> won't boot - they stop at the nouveau driver. Luckily I still had a
> 2.6.37 kernel which isn't affected
On 06 Apr 2011, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> A Dimecres 06 Abril 2011 16:30:08, Wolodja Wentland va escriure:
> > I assume that you are actually trying to fix a different bug, namely one
> > introduced by the premature installation of base-files 6.2 which created
> > the /run directory. The fastest
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 15:20 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 04:13:36PM +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> > > Last Udev version have an important error:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
A Dimecres 06 Abril 2011 16:30:08, Wolodja Wentland va escriure:
> I assume that you are actually trying to fix a different bug, namely one
> introduced by the premature installation of base-files 6.2 which created
> the /run directory. The fastest fix is probably to just remove /run and be
> done
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 15:20 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 04:13:36PM +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> > Last Udev version have an important error:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
> >
> > Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:13 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> Last Udev version have an important error:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
>
> Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
You can get them from: http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/166-1/
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 04:20:24PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-04-06 16:13 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
>
> > Last Udev version have an important error:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
> >
> > Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
>
> On
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 04:13:36PM +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> Last Udev version have an important error:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
>
> Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/166-1/
Note that downgrad
On 2011-04-06 16:13 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> Last Udev version have an important error:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
>
> Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
On snapshot.debian.org. Alternatively, you can rm -rf /run and restart
udev.
Sv
13 matches
Mail list logo
