Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes

1997-01-12 Thread Bill Roman
One thing I'm surprised has gone unsaid in this discussion -- keep some extra space for testing new distributions. Even with my meager total of 330MB (yes, I'm adding another drive RSN) I have enough space to install a minimal system with the stuff that's really important to me, like uucp and smai

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes (fwd)

1997-01-10 Thread Pete Templin
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Timothy Phan wrote: > :Make the following symlinks: > : > :/tmp -> /local/tmp (unless you might share this drive via NFS) > :/home-> /local/home > :/usr/local ->/local/usr > :/var/spool ->/local/spool (again, if using NFS, you should b

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes (fwd)

1997-01-09 Thread Timothy Phan
Pete Templin wrote: : :My suggestion? : :20M/ :500M /usr :100M /var :(the rest) /local (or whatever) : :Make the following symlinks: : :/tmp -> /local/tmp (unless you might share this drive via NFS) :/home -> /local/home :/usr/local -> /local/usr

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes

1997-01-09 Thread Pete Templin
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Matt Kracht wrote: > You might want something like the following: > > 50MB / > 100MB /var > 250MB /var/spool > 250MB /tmp > 500MB /usr > 750MB /usr/local > 100MB swap My $0.02: you're not going to win any _performance_ wars by making more partitions, particularly if

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes

1997-01-09 Thread Terrence M. Brannon
I've been aching to ask this for about a week but thought "no, its off subject." I still havent mailed in my Partition Magic receipts. 1- I resized my dos partition and now have [dos] [free space][linux swap][linux ext] as my partitions. How can I add the free space to linux ext? Please excus

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes

1997-01-09 Thread Thomas Baetzler
Matt Kracht wrote: :Partitioning is kind of fun. Maybe it's just me, but I can almost :imagine a cut scene in Batman III where Jim Carrey says, "Riddle me this, :Batman! If I've got a two gig hard drive, how large should /usr be?" :-) If there's one thing I can recommend it's making sure the s

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes

1997-01-09 Thread Guy Maor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald van Loon) writes: > |"You might want something like the following: > |" > |" 50MB / > > Is 50 Mb enough ? My / is 16 megs and currently half empty even with four different kernels in /boot. If /usr, /var, /tmp, and /home are elsewhere, / is kept small and low-access.

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes

1997-01-09 Thread Ronald van Loon
|"You might want something like the following: |" |" 50MB / Is 50 Mb enough ? |" 100MB /var |" 250MB /var/spool |" 250MB /tmp |" 500MB /usr |" 750MB /usr/local |" 100MB swap |" |"You can then mount / and /usr as read-only. I assume you meant /home by |""user data". Yes, that's correct. I o

Re: Disk partitioning - recommended sizes

1997-01-09 Thread Matt Kracht
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Ronald van Loon wrote: > This leaves about 2.0 Gb for the /, /usr, /var/spool and swap partitions. I > have another 2.0 Gb disk and I am contemplating to put the swap partition on > there (for load balancing). > > I estimate a need for about 250 Mb spool. Partitioning is k